Recycling 0os't Total economic profit is highest when the recyding production method is When the tannery uses the recyding method, the hiking lodge earns $1,800 - $1,000 = $800 more per week than it does with no recycling. Therefore, the hiking lodge should be willing to pay up to $800 per week for the tannery to recycle water. However, the recycling method decreases the tannery's economic profit by $2,000 - $1,500 = $500 per week. Therefore, the tannery should be willing to use the recycling method if It is compensated with at least $500 per week. Suppose the hiking lodge has the property rights to the lake. That is, the hiking lodge has the right to a dean (unpolluted) lake. In this case, assuming the recycling method and will pay the hiking lodge the two firms can bargain at no cost, the tannery will per week. Now, suppose the tannery has the property rights to the lake, induding the right to pollute it. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no the recyding method, and the hiking lodge will pay the tannery per week. cost, the tannery will The tannery will make the most economic profit when True or False: The lake will remain polluted, regardless of who has the property rights. O True O False
Recycling 0os't Total economic profit is highest when the recyding production method is When the tannery uses the recyding method, the hiking lodge earns $1,800 - $1,000 = $800 more per week than it does with no recycling. Therefore, the hiking lodge should be willing to pay up to $800 per week for the tannery to recycle water. However, the recycling method decreases the tannery's economic profit by $2,000 - $1,500 = $500 per week. Therefore, the tannery should be willing to use the recycling method if It is compensated with at least $500 per week. Suppose the hiking lodge has the property rights to the lake. That is, the hiking lodge has the right to a dean (unpolluted) lake. In this case, assuming the recycling method and will pay the hiking lodge the two firms can bargain at no cost, the tannery will per week. Now, suppose the tannery has the property rights to the lake, induding the right to pollute it. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no the recyding method, and the hiking lodge will pay the tannery per week. cost, the tannery will The tannery will make the most economic profit when True or False: The lake will remain polluted, regardless of who has the property rights. O True O False
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
Related questions
Question
A4

Transcribed Image Text:8. The effects of property rights on achieving efficiency
Consider a lake found in the town of Center Barnstead, and then answer the questions that follow.
The town has a hiking lodge whose visitors use the lake for
recreation. The town also has a tannery that dumps industrial
waste into the lake. This pollutes the lake and makes it a less
desirable vacation destination. That is, the tannety's waste
decreases the hiking lodge's economic profit.
Suppose that the taninery could use a different production miethod that involves recycling water. This would reduce the pollution in the lake to levels
safe for recreation, and the hiking lodge would no longer be affected. If the tannery uses the recycling method, then the tannery's economic profit is
$1,500 per week, and the hiking lodge's economic profit is $1,800 per week. If the tannery does not use the recyding method, then the tannery's
economic profit is $2,000 per week, and the hiking lodge's economic profit is $1,000 per week. These figures are summarized in the following table.
Complete the following table by computing the total profit (the tannery's economic profit and the hiking lodge's economic profit combined) with and
without recycling.
Profit
Tannery
Hiking Lodge
Total
Action
(Dollars)
(Dollars)
(Dollars)
No Recycling
2,000
1,000
Recycling
1,500
1,800

Transcribed Image Text:Recycling
0os't
Total economic profit is highest when the recyding production method is
When the tannery uses the recyding method, the hiking lodge earns $1,800 - $1,000 = $800 more per week than it does with no recycling.
Therefore, the hiking lodge should Ble willing to pay up to $800 per week for the tannery to recycle water. However, the recycling method decreases
the tannery's economic profit by $2,000 - $1,500 = $500 per week. Therefore, the tannery should be willing to use the recycling method if it is
compensated with at least $500 per week.
Suppose the hiking lodge has the property rights to the lake. That is, the hiking lodge has the right to a dean (unpolluted) lake. In this case, assuming
the two firms can bargain at no cost, the tannery will
the recycling method and will pay the hiking lodge
per week.
Now, suppose the tannery has the property rights to the lake, induding the right to pollute it. In this case, assuming the two firms can bargain at no
the recyding method, and the hiking lodge will pay the tannery
cost, the tannery will
per week.
The tannery will make the most economic profit when
True or False: The lake will remain polluted, regardless of who has the property rights.
O True
O False
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps

Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you


Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON


Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON

Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education