Read what Jeffery said and then respond to it

Social Psychology (10th Edition)
10th Edition
ISBN:9780134641287
Author:Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers
Publisher:Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers
Chapter1: Introducing Social Psychology
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ1
icon
Related questions
Question
Read what Jeffery said and then respond to it
By use of the definition provided, as regards morality,
what we may derive therefrom with respect to the
innate characteristics all( or most) humans share, is
precisely a herd morality, to use the conception
furnished by Friedrich Nietzche in his On the
Genealogy of Morality. That the determination of the
value of things, the valuation of all things, is but a
fixed wedge, into which fits the moral structure,
exhaustively and comprehensively, of "all(or most)
humans." That the concept of "good and evil," used
wherever it may, is but merely an adoption of what
stands revered, recognized, and practiced within one's
"natural" domain. And if such should be termed
morality itself, how is it that one would distinguish for
themself, to think for themself, respecting the
moralizing of things when precisely the "nature of
humans" is maintained distinguisher?-- who or what it
is which is to distinguish this standard on that account
remains as yet resolved and, moreover, hazards
especially all who are as yet to assume this "human
nature."
Transcribed Image Text:By use of the definition provided, as regards morality, what we may derive therefrom with respect to the innate characteristics all( or most) humans share, is precisely a herd morality, to use the conception furnished by Friedrich Nietzche in his On the Genealogy of Morality. That the determination of the value of things, the valuation of all things, is but a fixed wedge, into which fits the moral structure, exhaustively and comprehensively, of "all(or most) humans." That the concept of "good and evil," used wherever it may, is but merely an adoption of what stands revered, recognized, and practiced within one's "natural" domain. And if such should be termed morality itself, how is it that one would distinguish for themself, to think for themself, respecting the moralizing of things when precisely the "nature of humans" is maintained distinguisher?-- who or what it is which is to distinguish this standard on that account remains as yet resolved and, moreover, hazards especially all who are as yet to assume this "human nature."
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
Social Psychology (10th Edition)
Social Psychology (10th Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:
9780134641287
Author:
Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers
Publisher:
Pearson College Div
Introduction to Sociology (Eleventh Edition)
Introduction to Sociology (Eleventh Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:
9780393639407
Author:
Deborah Carr, Anthony Giddens, Mitchell Duneier, Richard P. Appelbaum
Publisher:
W. W. Norton & Company
The Basics of Social Research (MindTap Course Lis…
The Basics of Social Research (MindTap Course Lis…
Sociology
ISBN:
9781305503076
Author:
Earl R. Babbie
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Scien…
Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Scien…
Sociology
ISBN:
9780134477596
Author:
Saferstein, Richard
Publisher:
PEARSON
Sociology: A Down-to-Earth Approach (13th Edition)
Sociology: A Down-to-Earth Approach (13th Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:
9780134205571
Author:
James M. Henslin
Publisher:
PEARSON
Society: The Basics (14th Edition)
Society: The Basics (14th Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:
9780134206325
Author:
John J. Macionis
Publisher:
PEARSON