Raju and Jai commenced business in partnership on April 1, 2017. No partnership agreement was made whether oral or written. They contributed Rs. 4,00,000 andRs. 1,00,000 respectively as capitals. In addtion, Raju advanced Rs. 2,00,000 as loan to the firm on October 1, 2017. Raju met with an accident on July 1, 2017 and could not attend the business up to september 30, 2017.The profit for the year ended March 31, 2018 amounted to Rs, 50,600. Disputes have arisen between them on sharing the profits of the firm.Raju Claims:(i) He should be given interest at 10% p.a. on capital and so also on loan.(ii) Profit should he distributed in the proportion of capitals.Jai Claims:(i) Net profit should be shared equally.(ii) He should be allowed remuneration of Rs, 1,000 p.a. during the period ofRaju’s illness.(iii) Interest on capital and loan should be given @ 6% p.a.State the correct position on each issue as per the provisions of thePartnership Act. 1932.
Raju and Jai commenced business in
Rs. 1,00,000 respectively as capitals. In addtion, Raju advanced Rs. 2,00,000 as loan to the firm on October 1, 2017. Raju met with an accident on July 1, 2017 and could not attend the business up to september 30, 2017.
The profit for the year ended March 31, 2018 amounted to Rs, 50,600. Disputes have arisen between them on sharing the profits of the firm.
Raju Claims:
(i) He should be given interest at 10% p.a. on capital and so also on loan.
(ii) Profit should he distributed in the proportion of capitals.
Jai Claims:
(i) Net profit should be shared equally.
(ii) He should be allowed remuneration of Rs, 1,000 p.a. during the period of
Raju’s illness.
(iii) Interest on capital and loan should be given @ 6% p.a.
State the correct position on each issue as per the provisions of the
Partnership Act. 1932.
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
