RAID is predisposed to take into account ordinary rotating magnetic discs as a starting point. Is it required to use RAID for SSD storage? If this is not the case, does this make SSD storage a little more inexpensive for businesses? Is it important to have redundant discs, and if so, do they have to be solid-state drives (SSDs)?

RAID is predisposed to take into account ordinary rotating magnetic discs as a starting point. Is it required to use RAID for SSD storage? If this is not the case, does this make SSD storage a little more inexpensive for businesses? Is it important to have redundant discs, and if so, do they have to be solid-state drives (SSDs)?

MIS

9th Edition

ISBN:9781337681919

Author:BIDGOLI

Publisher:BIDGOLI

Chapter2: Computers: The Machines Behind Computing

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 6RD

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

RAID is predisposed to take into account ordinary rotating magnetic disks as a starting point. Is it required to use RAID for SSD storage? If this is not the case, does this make SSD storage a little more inexpensive for businesses? Is it important to have redundant disks, and if so, do they have to be solid-state drives (SSDs)?
RAID is biased toward consideration of standard rotating magnetic disks. Is RAID necessary for SSD storage? If not, does this make SSD storage slightly more affordable for the enterprise? If it is necessary, do the redundant disks necessarily also need to be SSD?
Parallel attempts are made to write sections of a file to separate hard drives. Is there a reason why doing so is so crucial for magnetic disks? Do we still need to use SSDs if they are readily accessible, or is it a waste of time? How come this is the case?
On disk, operating systems endeavor to store files in sequentially arranged blocks. The usage of magnetic disks appears superfluous for this operation.Do you suppose SSDs are required if you do not use them? Exists a justification for this occurrence?
Hard disk drives (HDD), RAM, Solid State Drives (SSDS), and cache memory are all examples of digital memory. To what extent would it be preferable for consumers to have a single memory standard, like the many sizes of solid-state drives? Does a single standard save money for consumers? There are two methods to access memory: sequentially and directly. Direct access is increasingly being used
The same disk block is used by operating systems to read consecutive blocks of a file. What's the big deal about magnetic disks? Is the use of SSDs still relevant, or has this become obsolete? Are there any explanations for this?
Hard disk drives (HDD), RAM, Solid State Drives (SSDs), and cache memory are all examples of digital memory. To what extent would it be preferable for consumers to have a single memory standard, like the many sizes of solid-state drives? Does a single standard save money for consumers? There are two methods to access memory: sequentially and directly. Direct access is increasingly being used in critical devices for what reasons? If a device only permits sequential access, how can we transfer data to one that only allows direct access?
Operating systems make an effort to maintain the position of consecutive blocks on the disk in the event that a file is read from a disk block. What exactly are the benefits of using magnetic disks? Should we continue to encourage using SSDs, or have we reached a point where this advice is no longer relevant? Solid-state drives (SSDs) have been held in high regard as a better storage medium for some time. There is unquestionably a rationale underlying all of this activity.
It's possible that the use of RAID to do live backups of physical hard drives might have an effect on the amount of actual storage space that's accessible on a hard disc. Is it still desirable to create a backup if doing so involves using up 50 percent of the available space on the disc? In order to prevent the hard disks on a home computer from being corrupted as a result of the frequent loss of power, which RAID configuration is the most effective to use?
Operating systems store sequential file blocks on consecutive disk blocks. Why is it important to do so with magnetic disks?Do SSDs still need to be used, or do they no longer make a difference? Explicate why.
There are certain databases that only utilize the external tracks of magnetic disks for data storage, therefore the data that is stored on the magnetic disk's internal tracks may be lost. This kind of arrangement is referred to as a "hotspot" in the industry. What are the specific advantages of acting in this manner, and why should one do so?
Operating systems make an effort to store files in chunks that are sequentially ordered on disk. The use of magnetic disks for this task seems unnecessary.If you don't use SSDs, do you believe they're still necessary? Is there a rationale for this phenomenon?