20 Question: 77Boston, Inc., planned and actually manufactured 190,000 units of its single product in 2017,its first year of operation. Variable manufacturing cost was $20 per unit produced. Variableoperating (nonmanufacturing) cost was $9 per unit sold. Planned and actual fixedmanufacturing costs were $950,000. Planned and actual fixed operating(nonmanufacturing) costs totaled $360,000. Boston sold 130,000 units of a product at $40per unit.Boston's 2017 operating income using absorption costing isa) $420,000b) $120,000c) $480,000d) $780,000e) none of these.

Computation of operating income by using the absorption costing method as follows:Resultant values:

Answered: Question: 77 Boston, Inc., planned and…

Managerial Accounting

15th Edition

ISBN:9781337912020

Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler

Publisher:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler

Chapter7: Variable Costing For Management analysis

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4CMA: Bethany Company has just completed the first month of producing a new product but has not yet...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Please provide correct solution for correct answer with help
please see image.
None
(CMA) Miami, Inc., planned and actually manufactured 250,000 units of its single product in 2017, its first year of operation. Variable manufacturing cost was $19 per unit produced. Variable operating (nonmanufacturing) cost was $13 per unit sold. Planned and actual fixed manufacturing costs were $750,000. Planned and actual fixed operating (nonmanufacturing) costs totaled $420,000. Miami sold 170,000 units of product at $41 per unit. Q. Miami’s 2017 operating income using absorption costing is (a) $600,000, (b) $360,000, (c) $780,000, (d) $1,020,000, or (e) none of these. Show supporting calculations.
(CMA) Miami, Inc., planned and actually manufactured 250,000 units of its single product in 2017, its first year of operation. Variable manufacturing cost was $19 per unit produced. Variable operating (nonmanufacturing) cost was $13 per unit sold. Planned and actual fixed manufacturing costs were $750,000. Planned and actual fixed operating (nonmanufacturing) costs totaled $420,000. Miami sold 170,000 units of product at $41 per unit. Q. Miami’s 2017 operating income using variable costing is (a) $1,100,000, (b) $600,000, (c) $360,000, (d) $780,000, or (e) none of these. Show supporting calculations.
please see image.
Boston, Inc., planned and actually manufactured 200,000 units of its single product in 2017, its first year of operation. Variable manufacturing cost was $20 per unit produced. Variable operating (nonmanufacturing) cost was $11 per unit sold. Planned and actual fixed manufacturing costs were $1,000,000. Planned and actual fixed operating (nonmanufacturing) costs totaled $370,000. Boston sold 140,000 units of product at $46 per unit. Read the requirements LOADING... . Requirement 1. Boston's 2017 operating income using absorption costing is (a) $1,030,000, (b) $730,000, (c) $1,100,000, (d) $1,400,000, or (e) none of these. Show supporting calculations. Begin by selecting the labels used in the absorption costing calculation of operating income and enter the supporting amounts. Perform the calculations in this step, but select the correct operating income in the next step. (For amounts with a $0 balance, make sure to enter "0" in the appropriate cell.)…
Hamilton Inc. planned and actually manufactured 250,000 units of its single product in 2022, its first year of operation. Variable manufacturing cost was $19 per unit produced. Variable operating (non-manufacturing) cost was $10 per unit sold. Planned and actual fixed manufacturing costs were $750,000. Planned and actual fixed operating (non-manufacturing) costs totalled $370,000. Hamilton sold 110,000 units of product at $45 per unit. Required 1. Hamilton's 2022 operating income using absorption costing is (a) $4,700,000, (b) $1,060,000, (c) $640,000, (d) $(2,580,000), or (e) none of these. Show supporting calculations. 2. Hamilton's 2022 operating income using variable costing is (a) $4,700,000, (b) $1,060,000, (c) $640,000, (d) $(2,580,000), or (e) none of these. Show supporting calculations. Requirement 1. Hamilton's 2022 operating income using absorption costing is (a) $1,060,000, (b) $640,000, (c) $4,700,000, (d) $(2,580,000), or (e) none of these. Show supporting calculations.…
Seattle, Inc., planned and actually manufactured 190,000 units of its single product in 2017, its first year of operation. Variable manufacturing cost was $21 per unit produced. Variable operating (nonmanufacturing) cost was $7 per unit sold. Planned and actual fixed manufacturing costs were $570,000. Planned and actual fixed operating (nonmanufacturing) costs totaled $430,000. Seattle sold 100,000 units of product at $44 per unit. Read the requirements. Requirement 1. Seattle's 2017 operating income using absorption costing is (a) $870,000, (b) $600,000, (c) $1,030,000, (d) $1,300,000, or (e) none of these. Show supporting calculations. Begin by selecting the labels used in the absorption costing calculation of operating income and enter the supporting amounts. Perform the calculations in this step, but select the correct operating income in the next step. (For amounts with a $0 balance, make sure to enter "0" in the appropriate cell.) Absorption costing
Please, see image.
Jane Company started its operations at the beginning of 2016. The production and sales data of for the year 2016 wvere as follows: Variable costs per unit: • Direct materials: $20 • Direct labor: $10 • Variable manufacturing overhead: $4 Variable selling and administrative expenses: $8 Fixed costs per year: • Fixed manufacturing overhead: $180,000 • Fixed selling and administrative expenses: $600,000 During the year 2016, Jane Company manufactured 30,000 units out of which 22.000 units were sold. What is the cost of goods sold using absorption costing? (DO NOT USE COMMAS OR ANY SYMBOLS)
Current Attempt in Progress Lily Company uses a standard cost accounting system. In 2022, the company produced 27,600 units. Each unit took several pounds of direct materials and 1.6 standard hours of direct labor at a standard hourly rate of $12.00. Normal capacity was 50,300 direct labor hours. During the year, 130,200 pounds of raw materials were purchased at $0.90 per pound. All materials purchased were used during the year. (a) If the materials price variance was $5,208 favorable, what was the standard materials price per pound? (Round answer to 2 decimal places, e.g. 2.75.) Standard materials price per pound

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Managerial Accounting

Accounting

ISBN:

9781337912020

Author:

Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler

Publisher:

South-Western College Pub

Financial And Managerial Accounting

Accounting

ISBN:

9781337902663

Author:

WARREN, Carl S.

Publisher:

Cengage Learning,

Principles of Cost Accounting

Accounting

ISBN:

9781305087408

Author:

Edward J. Vanderbeck, Maria R. Mitchell

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Managerial Accounting

Accounting

ISBN:

9781337912020

Author:

Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler

Publisher:

South-Western College Pub

Financial And Managerial Accounting

Accounting

ISBN:

9781337902663

Author:

WARREN, Carl S.

Publisher:

Cengage Learning,

Principles of Cost Accounting

Accounting

ISBN:

9781305087408

Author:

Edward J. Vanderbeck, Maria R. Mitchell

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser…

Accounting

ISBN:

9781305970663

Author:

Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS