Question 4 A village has two villagers with an income of £200 each. The village decides to take contributions to build a new commons. The commons can be of any size, and generates By utility for each of the villagers if the total contribution is y, where is a strictly positive real number. Contributions are also real numbers, bounded between 0 and 200. If villager 1 contributes ₁ and villager 2 contributes x2, then villager i's utility is 200 - x + B(x₁+x₂). (a) What are the pure strategy Nash equilibria for each value of 3? (b) The mayor, an LSE trained economist who only values the total utility of the villagers, decides that she will only build the commons if total contributions exceed 80. That is, if x₁ + x2 < 80, then citizen i gets utility of 200-x, and if x1 + x2 ≥ 80, she gets 200-xi+B (x1+x2). What is the logic behind the mayor's change? For what values of 3 would you expect an improvement from the change? Explain and justify your answers with game theoretic reasoning.

Principles of Microeconomics
7th Edition
ISBN:9781305156050
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw
Chapter22: Frontiers Of Microeconomics
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 6PA
icon
Related questions
Question

Answer the B par

Question 4
A village has two villagers with an income of £200 each. The village decides to take contributions
to build a new commons. The commons can be of any size, and generates By utility for each of the
villagers if the total contribution is y, where B is a strictly positive real number. Contributions are also
real numbers, bounded between 0 and 200. If villager 1 contributes r1 and villager 2 contributes r2,
then villager i's utility is 200 – Xi + B (x1 + x2).
(a)
What are the pure strategy Nash equilibria for each value of 3?
The mayor, an LSE trained economist who only values the total utility of the villagers, decides
(b)
that she will only build the commons if total contributions exceed 80. That is, if r1 + r2 < 80,
then citizen i gets utility of 200 – xi, and if xi +r2 > 80, she gets 200 – Xi +B (x1 + x2). What
is the logic behind the mayor's change? For what values of B would you expect an improvement
from the change? Explain and justify your answers with game theoretic reasoning.
Transcribed Image Text:Question 4 A village has two villagers with an income of £200 each. The village decides to take contributions to build a new commons. The commons can be of any size, and generates By utility for each of the villagers if the total contribution is y, where B is a strictly positive real number. Contributions are also real numbers, bounded between 0 and 200. If villager 1 contributes r1 and villager 2 contributes r2, then villager i's utility is 200 – Xi + B (x1 + x2). (a) What are the pure strategy Nash equilibria for each value of 3? The mayor, an LSE trained economist who only values the total utility of the villagers, decides (b) that she will only build the commons if total contributions exceed 80. That is, if r1 + r2 < 80, then citizen i gets utility of 200 – xi, and if xi +r2 > 80, she gets 200 – Xi +B (x1 + x2). What is the logic behind the mayor's change? For what values of B would you expect an improvement from the change? Explain and justify your answers with game theoretic reasoning.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps with 12 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Utility Function
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Microeconomics
Principles of Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:
9781305156050
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning