QUESTION 22 The value of land (as diannot trom human improvements to landi is oreated by nature and sodiety. In adolion, the supply of land is perfectiy inelastio. Iam a strong advooate of raising taxes on land and other natural resourcee, but also reducing tax improvemernts (eg. buldingn). Which of the folkowing statements about siting taxes from buidrgs to land is FALSE? on human The supply of buidrgs woud increase, eupecialy where land values are high None of the land tax inorease woud be pased on to reriers The tax shit would reduce speoulation in land The tax sit would create a dead weight los of ecoromic surplus The tax ohit should reduce urban aprawl

Principles of Economics 2e
2nd Edition
ISBN:9781947172364
Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Chapter18: Public Economy
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 20CTQ: To ensure safety and efficacy, the Food and Drug Administration regulates the medicines that...
icon
Related questions
Question
QUESTION 22
The value of land (as distinct from human improvements to landi is created by nature and society. In adoltion, the supply of land is perfectly inelastic. I am a strong advocate of raising taxes on land and other natural resourcee, but also reducing taxes on human
improvements (eg. buildings). Which of the feloning statements about shiting taxes from buidrgs to land is FALSE?
-The supply of buildings would increase, especially where land values are high
None of the land lax inerease woud be pased on to reriers
The tax shilt would reduce speculation in land
The tax shift would create a dead weight loss of economic surplus
The tax ehift should reduce urban sprawl
Transcribed Image Text:QUESTION 22 The value of land (as distinct from human improvements to landi is created by nature and society. In adoltion, the supply of land is perfectly inelastic. I am a strong advocate of raising taxes on land and other natural resourcee, but also reducing taxes on human improvements (eg. buildings). Which of the feloning statements about shiting taxes from buidrgs to land is FALSE? -The supply of buildings would increase, especially where land values are high None of the land lax inerease woud be pased on to reriers The tax shilt would reduce speculation in land The tax shift would create a dead weight loss of economic surplus The tax ehift should reduce urban sprawl
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Investments
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Economics 2e
Principles of Economics 2e
Economics
ISBN:
9781947172364
Author:
Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:
OpenStax
Microeconomics: Principles & Policy
Microeconomics: Principles & Policy
Economics
ISBN:
9781337794992
Author:
William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. Solow
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Economics:
Economics:
Economics
ISBN:
9781285859460
Author:
BOYES, William
Publisher:
Cengage Learning