No written by hand solution QUESTION 13Suppose that LuAnn and Jill are both in the public eye. They get offers to sell secrets of the other to tabloids. If both keep the secrets, theyare both better off than if they get exposed. If only one is exposed, the other person is better off than if no one was exposed. Theirpayoffs from each option are given in the payoff matrix.JillExposesecretsKeepsecretsReference: Ref 4-2Expose secretsJill$5Jill$2LuAnn$5LuAnn$10LuAnnKeep secretsJill$10Jill$8LuAnn$2LuAnn$8Suppose that Jill and LuAnn play the game over four seasons where each season is a new game. A tit-for-tat strategy is one where aperson starts out playing 'keep secret' and then plays whatever strategy the other person played last. Over four seasons, how much willJill make if she plays a tit-for-tat strategy and LuAnn always 'expose secrets'?O A. $17B. $25C. $32D. $20

A dominant strategy refers to the strategy which the player does not change regardless of the other…

QUESTION 13 Suppose that LuAnn and Jill are both in the public eye. They get offers to sell secrets of the other to tabloids. If both keep the secrets, they are both better off than if they get exposed. If only one is exposed, the other person is better off than if no one was exposed. Their payoffs from each option are given in the payoff matrix. Jill Expose secrets Keep secrets Reference: Ref 4-2 Expose secrets B. $25 C. $32 O D. $20 Jill $5 Jill $2 LuAnn $5 LuAnn $10 LuAnn Keep secrets Jill $10 Jill $8 LuAnn $2 LuAnn $8 Suppose that Jill and LuAnn play the game over four seasons where each season is a new game. A tit-for-tat strategy is one where a person starts out playing 'keep secret' and then plays whatever strategy the other person played last. Over four seasons, how much will Jill make if she plays a tit-for-tat strategy and LuAnn always 'expose secrets'? O A. $17

QUESTION 13 Suppose that LuAnn and Jill are both in the public eye. They get offers to sell secrets of the other to tabloids. If both keep the secrets, they are both better off than if they get exposed. If only one is exposed, the other person is better off than if no one was exposed. Their payoffs from each option are given in the payoff matrix. Jill Expose secrets Keep secrets Reference: Ref 4-2 Expose secrets B. $25 C. $32 O D. $20 Jill $5 Jill $2 LuAnn $5 LuAnn $10 LuAnn Keep secrets Jill $10 Jill $8 LuAnn $2 LuAnn $8 Suppose that Jill and LuAnn play the game over four seasons where each season is a new game. A tit-for-tat strategy is one where a person starts out playing 'keep secret' and then plays whatever strategy the other person played last. Over four seasons, how much will Jill make if she plays a tit-for-tat strategy and LuAnn always 'expose secrets'? O A. $17

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter8: Game Theory

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8.9P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

You and a coworker are assigned a team project on which your likelihood or a promotion will be decidedon. It is now the night before the project is due and neither has yet to start it. You both want toreceive a promotion next year, but you both also want to go to your company’s holiday party that night.Each of you wants to maximize his or her own happiness (likelihood of a promotion and mingling withyour colleagues “on the company’s dime”). If you both work, you deliver an outstanding presentation.If you both go to the party, your presentation is mediocre. If one parties and the other works, yourpresentation is above average. Partying increases happiness by 25 units. Working on the project addszero units to happiness. Happiness is also affected by your chance of a promotion, which is depends on howgood your project is. An outstanding presentation gives 40 units of happiness to each of you; an aboveaverage presentation gives 30 units of happiness; a mediocre presentation gives 10 units…
2. Consider the following Bayesian game with two players. Both players move simultaneously and player 1 can choose either H or L, while player 2's options are G, M, and D. With probability 1/2 the payoffs are given by "Game 1" : GMD H 1,2 1,0 1,3 L 2,4 0,0 0,5 and with probability 1/2 the payoffs are according to "Game 2" : G |M|D H 1,2 1,3 1,0 L 2,4 0,5 0,0 (a) Find the Nash Equilibria when neither player knows which game is actually played. (b) Assume now that player 2 knows which one among the two games is actually being played. Check that the game has a unique Bayesian Nash Equilibrium.
Ma3. The payoff matrix below shows the payoffs for Stefan and Imani in a two strategy game. In the mixed strategy equilibrium, Stefan will play strategy Up with a probability of 1/5 and strategy Down with a probability of 4/5, and Imani will play strategy Left with a probability of 2/5 and strategy Right with a probability of 3/5. What is Stefan's expected payoff in the mixed strategy equilibrium? 10.6 5 4.56 10.4
Question 4. Zeynep and Mehmet will eventually play the following game. Mehmet L R U 3,1 0,0 Zeynep D 0,3 1,3 In a preliminary stage, Zeynep has already asked Mehmet to allow her to move first and proposed to pay him 1 unit of her own payoff in exchange. So Mehmet has to options: • If he accepts Zeynep's offer: they will play the sequential move version of the above game in which Zeynep moves first. Mehmet will receive 1 unit of utility more, and Zeynep will receive 1 unit of utility less (in any outcome of the game) compared to the payoffs given in the bimatrix. 2 • If he rejects Zeynep's offer: they will play the simultaneous move game. a. Represent this strategic interaction in a game tree. b. How many information sets does each player have? c. Characterize the set of pure strategies for both players. d. Present this game as a normal-form game, and characterize the set of pure strategy Nash equi- libria.
Pl and P2 play a simultaneous move game with payoffs given below. Suppose now that both players have private information. P1 knows the value of 01, but P2 does not. P2 knows the value of 02, but P1 does not. Р2 A В A 01,–1 1,0 P1 В 1,0 0, 02 Suppose 01 is equal to either 0 or –1, each with probability 1 Suppose 02 is equal to either –l or 1, each with probability 1/2. All of the above is common knowledge. Again, notice that even though 0; is random from Pj's perspective, Pi knows what O; is. Consider pure equilibria of the game. (By pure equilibrium, I mean that no type of any player mixes in the equilibrium, but this doesn't mean that each type of a player has to do the same thing.) How many pure equilibria does this game have? Numerical answer
1Y You have to decide whether to invest $100 in a friend's enterprise, where in a year's time the money will increase to $150. You have agreed that your friend will split the profits evenly each year with you. Your alternative is to keep at the bank at an interest rate of r. Suppose this game is played repeatedly infinitely often. The rate of interest between any two successive periods is r, the same as that in the bank and the same for you and your friend. What is the cut-off interest rate which will make cooperation possible?
GAME UUU B1 Player B B2 A1 7,13 5, 10 A2 3,8 9,16 Player A A3 5,8 4,7 In Game UUU (see table above), assuming players move simultaneously, Player A choosing A1 and Player B choosing B3 is a Nash equilibrium. Player A choosing A3 and Player B choosing B2 is a Nash equilibrium. Both Player A choosing A1 and Player B choosing B1 and Player A choosing A2 and player B choosing B2 are Nash equilibria in pure strategies Player A choosing A1 and Player B choosing B2 is a Nash equilibrium.
2. Consider the following simultaneous move stage game. In each cell, player l's payoff is shown first. Player 2 L C R T 3, 1 0 ,0 5 , 0 Player 1 M 2, 1 I, 2 3 , 1 В 1, 0 , 1 4, 4 This game is played twice, without discounting of the second stage payoffs. Both players observe the outcome of the first stage prior to making their second stage choices. Determine whether or not (4,4) can be the first stage payoffs from a pure strategy subgame perfect Nash equilibrium. Explain your answer carefully.
3. Repeated Game Consider the game in which the stage game depicted below is infinitely repeated and in which both players discount future payoffs with discount factor 6 € [0, 1]. Player 1 E S Player 2 E 3,3 4, -1 S -1.4 1,1 (a) Suppose that both players play the tit-for-tat strategy. This strategy is characterized by exerting effort (playing E) in the first round. Then in future rounds, a player copies the action chosen by his opponent in the previous period (i.e if Player 2 shirks (plays S) in period 2, then Player 1 plays S in period 3). Then, for what values of d can tit-for-tat be supported on the equilibrium path of play? (b) Suppose that both players play the perfect tit-for-tat strategy. This strategy is characterized by exerting effort (playing E) in the first round. Then in future rounds, a player plays E unless the actions are disagreed in the previous period. Then, for what values of d can perfect tit-for-tat be supported on the equilibrium path of play?
Two partners start a business. Each has two possible strategies, spend full time or secretly take a second job and spend only part time on the business. Any profits that the business makes will be split equally between the two partners, regardless of whether they work full time or part time for the business. If a partner takes a second job, he will earn $20,000 from this job plus his share of profits from the business. If he spends full time on the business, his only source of income is his share of profits from this business. If both partners spend full time on the business, total profits will be $200,000. If one partner spends full time on the business and the other takes a second job, the business profits will be $80,000. If both partners take second job, the total business profits are $20,000. a) This game has no pure strategy Nash equilibria, but has a mixed strategy equilibrium. b) This game has two Nash equilibria, one in which each partner has an income of $100,000 and one in…
6. There are 2 players who have to decide how to split one dollar. The bargaining process works as follows. Players simultaneously announce the share they would like to receive $₁ and $2, with 0 ≤ $1, S2 ≤ 1. If $1 + $2 ≤ 1, then the players receive the shares they named and if 8₁ + 82 > 1, then both players fail to achieve an agreement and receive zero. Which of the following strategy profiles is a pure strategy Nash equilibrium? O a) (0.3, 0.7); Ob) (0.5, 0.5); O c) (1.0, 1.0); Od) All of the above
3. Suppose we play the following game. I give you $100 for your initial bankroll. At each time n, you decide how much of your current wealth to bet. You cannot borrow money. You can only play with the money I gave you in the beginning or any money that you have won so far. The game is simple. At each time n ≥ 1, you decide the amount to bet. I will roll a fair die. If the die comes up 1,2,3,..., or 5, you win; if the die comes up 6, then you lose. IOW, if you bet $10 on the first roll, you will either have $90 or $110 after the first roll. (a) Suppose you wish to maximize your profit on the first roll. How much should you bet? (Most of you will get this wrong.) (b) What is the expected profit on the first roll if your bet is b with 0 ≤ b ≤ 100? (c) Suppose you wish to maximize your expected profit on the first roll. How much should you bet? (d) Suppose you wish to maximize your expected profit betting on the nth roll. How much of your current wealth do you bet? (e) Let X₂, be your…