Question 1. The rank of a formula is defined by recursion on formulas: • rk(A) = 0 for every basic formula. • rk(¬A) = rk(A) + 1. rk(A o B) = max(rk(A), rk(B)) +1 for o e {A, V}. • rk(A → B) = max(rk(A) + 1, rk(B))
Question 1. The rank of a formula is defined by recursion on formulas: • rk(A) = 0 for every basic formula. • rk(¬A) = rk(A) + 1. rk(A o B) = max(rk(A), rk(B)) +1 for o e {A, V}. • rk(A → B) = max(rk(A) + 1, rk(B))
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
Related questions
Question
please send handwritten solution for Q 1
![Question 1. The rank of a formula is defined by recursion on formulas:
• rk(A) = 0 for every basic formula.
• rk(¬A) = rk(A) + 1.
• rk(A o B) = max(rk(A), rk(B)) + 1 for o € {A, V}.
%3D
rk(A → B) = max(rk(A) +1, rk(B))
Prove by induction on formulas that rk(A) < depth(A) for all formulas A.](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2Fd0f8892e-30c8-410c-bb56-3f9903ad2c7b%2F0f413a52-fdd2-465a-b58c-a69e4fdd967c%2F4q4bwds_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:Question 1. The rank of a formula is defined by recursion on formulas:
• rk(A) = 0 for every basic formula.
• rk(¬A) = rk(A) + 1.
• rk(A o B) = max(rk(A), rk(B)) + 1 for o € {A, V}.
%3D
rk(A → B) = max(rk(A) +1, rk(B))
Prove by induction on formulas that rk(A) < depth(A) for all formulas A.
![Example of a function defined by recursion on formulas
We define the depth of a formula as follows
• depth(A) = 0 for every basic formula.
depth(¬A) = depth(A) +1.
depth(A o B) = max(depth(A), depth(B)) + 1 for ● E {A, V, →}.
We also let con(A) be the number of occurrences of logical connectives (A, V, →, -)
in the formula A.
Lemma 2. con(A) < 2depth(4).
Proof. By induction on formulas.
Induction base: If A is a basic formula, then con(A) = 0 < 1 = 2º = 2depth(A).
Induction step: We have to consider composite formulas.
¬A: By induction hypothesis (i.h.) we have con(A) < 2depth(4). Therefore
con(¬A)
con(A) + 1
i.h.
< 2depth(A) + 1
< 2 * 2depth(A)
2depth(4)+1
2depth(¬A)
Ao B where o € {A, V,→}: By induction hypothesis we have con(A) < 2depth(A) and
con(B) < 2depth(B).
con(A o B)
con(A) + con(B) + 1
< con(A) +1+ con(B) +1
i.h.
< 2depth(A) + 2depth(B)
< 2* 2max(depth(A),depth(B))
2depth(AoB)
This completes the proof.
||||](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2Fd0f8892e-30c8-410c-bb56-3f9903ad2c7b%2F0f413a52-fdd2-465a-b58c-a69e4fdd967c%2Flw2m1xx_processed.png&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:Example of a function defined by recursion on formulas
We define the depth of a formula as follows
• depth(A) = 0 for every basic formula.
depth(¬A) = depth(A) +1.
depth(A o B) = max(depth(A), depth(B)) + 1 for ● E {A, V, →}.
We also let con(A) be the number of occurrences of logical connectives (A, V, →, -)
in the formula A.
Lemma 2. con(A) < 2depth(4).
Proof. By induction on formulas.
Induction base: If A is a basic formula, then con(A) = 0 < 1 = 2º = 2depth(A).
Induction step: We have to consider composite formulas.
¬A: By induction hypothesis (i.h.) we have con(A) < 2depth(4). Therefore
con(¬A)
con(A) + 1
i.h.
< 2depth(A) + 1
< 2 * 2depth(A)
2depth(4)+1
2depth(¬A)
Ao B where o € {A, V,→}: By induction hypothesis we have con(A) < 2depth(A) and
con(B) < 2depth(B).
con(A o B)
con(A) + con(B) + 1
< con(A) +1+ con(B) +1
i.h.
< 2depth(A) + 2depth(B)
< 2* 2max(depth(A),depth(B))
2depth(AoB)
This completes the proof.
||||
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 2 images
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)
Recommended textbooks for you
![Advanced Engineering Mathematics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780470458365/9780470458365_smallCoverImage.gif)
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
![Numerical Methods for Engineers](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780073397924/9780073397924_smallCoverImage.gif)
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
![Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781118141809/9781118141809_smallCoverImage.gif)
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
![Advanced Engineering Mathematics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780470458365/9780470458365_smallCoverImage.gif)
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
![Numerical Methods for Engineers](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780073397924/9780073397924_smallCoverImage.gif)
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
![Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781118141809/9781118141809_smallCoverImage.gif)
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
![Mathematics For Machine Technology](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337798310/9781337798310_smallCoverImage.jpg)
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
![Basic Technical Mathematics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134437705/9780134437705_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Topology](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134689517/9780134689517_smallCoverImage.gif)