QUESTION 1 19 of 22 participants (86.36%) from the high-power posing group took a gambling risk to double their money, while 12 of 20 (60%) from the low-power posing group took the gambling risk. Use a calculator tool from Module 10 to determine the p-value associated with the hypothesis test examining if there is a statistically significant difference between the proportion of people willing to take risks in the two groups. Round to 3 decimal places. QUESTION 2 While it may even be questionable that the research team reported a significant result at the 0.05 level based upon our findings in question 1, let's observe the major impact a slight change makes in our calculation. Recalculate the p-value from part 1, but let's pretend that 18 of the 22 participants in the high-power group took the gambling risk. This new p-value speaks to the volatility of results when low sample sizes are used. Round this p-value to 3 decimal places.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
100%
I need help solving 1,2,4. I need finding the p-value
A Sta
t-test
A blackboard.wccnet.edu/webapps/assessment/take/launch.jsp?course_assessment_id=_655580_1&course_id=_96297_1&content_id%3_7095083_1&step=null
Re/Ap
Bb 84752
TED Amy C
S Tak X
Apps
WCC Gateway
All apps | Microsof...
A Winter 2020 MTH...
V5 Announcements -..
6 Launch Meeting -..
Your answers are saved automatically.
* Question Completion Status:
QUESTION 1
2
19 of 22 participants (86.36%) from the high-power posing group took a gambling risk to double their money, while 12 of 20 (60%) from the low-power posing group
took the gambling risk. Use a calculator tool from Module 10 to determine the p-value associated with the hypothesis test examining if there is a statistically
significant difference between the proportion of people willing to take risks in the two groups. Round to 3 decimal places.
2
QUESTION 2
While it may even be questionable that the research team reported a significant result at the 0.05 level based upon our findings in question 1, let's observe the
major impact a slight change makes in our calculation. Recalculate the p-value from part 1, but let's pretend that 18 of the 22 participants in the high-power group
took the gambling risk. This new p-value speaks to the volatility of results when low sample sizes are used. Round this p-value to 3 decimal places.
Many researchers tried to replicate the power posing research without success. One researcher used a sample size of n=200 (100 in each group). Let's assume 86
of the 100 people in the high-power group in this ngw research took the gambling risk, and 79 of 100 people in the low-power group took the gambling risk. Perform
a hypothesis test to again detect a difference between the proportions willing to gamble from the two power posing groups, and state the resulting p-value. Round
to 3 decimal places.
QUESTION 3
.193
Close Window
Save All Answers
Click Save and Submit to save and submit. Click Save All Answers to save all answers.
Transcribed Image Text:A Sta t-test A blackboard.wccnet.edu/webapps/assessment/take/launch.jsp?course_assessment_id=_655580_1&course_id=_96297_1&content_id%3_7095083_1&step=null Re/Ap Bb 84752 TED Amy C S Tak X Apps WCC Gateway All apps | Microsof... A Winter 2020 MTH... V5 Announcements -.. 6 Launch Meeting -.. Your answers are saved automatically. * Question Completion Status: QUESTION 1 2 19 of 22 participants (86.36%) from the high-power posing group took a gambling risk to double their money, while 12 of 20 (60%) from the low-power posing group took the gambling risk. Use a calculator tool from Module 10 to determine the p-value associated with the hypothesis test examining if there is a statistically significant difference between the proportion of people willing to take risks in the two groups. Round to 3 decimal places. 2 QUESTION 2 While it may even be questionable that the research team reported a significant result at the 0.05 level based upon our findings in question 1, let's observe the major impact a slight change makes in our calculation. Recalculate the p-value from part 1, but let's pretend that 18 of the 22 participants in the high-power group took the gambling risk. This new p-value speaks to the volatility of results when low sample sizes are used. Round this p-value to 3 decimal places. Many researchers tried to replicate the power posing research without success. One researcher used a sample size of n=200 (100 in each group). Let's assume 86 of the 100 people in the high-power group in this ngw research took the gambling risk, and 79 of 100 people in the low-power group took the gambling risk. Perform a hypothesis test to again detect a difference between the proportions willing to gamble from the two power posing groups, and state the resulting p-value. Round to 3 decimal places. QUESTION 3 .193 Close Window Save All Answers Click Save and Submit to save and submit. Click Save All Answers to save all answers.
494.T
Death
A The E
E Untitle
2 Unbe
Untitle
V6 Lectu
McGr
ALEKS
Re/Ap
Bb 84752
TED Amy C
Tal x
t-test
A blackboard.wccnet.edu/webapps/assessment/take/launch.jsp?course_assessment_id=_655580_1&course_id=_96297_1&content_id=_7095083_1&step=null
| Apps
WCC Gateway
All apps | Microsof..
A Winter 2020 MTH...
36 Announcements -.
O Launch Meeting -.
* Question Completion Status:
QUESTION 3
Many researchers tried to replicate the power posing research without success. One researcher ed a sample size of n=200 (100 in each group). Let's assume 86
of the 100 people in the high-power group in this new research took the gambling risk, and 79 of 00 people in the low-power group took the gambling risk. Perform
a hypothesis test to again detect a difference between the proportions willing to gamble from the two power p ing groups, and state the resulting p-value. Round
to 3 decimal places.
.193
QUESTION 4
If Amy Cuddy and her research team originally established a sample size of n=200 (100 in each group) and then discovered that 86% of the high-power group (86 of
100) took a gambling risk while 60% of the low-power group (60 of 100) took the risk, then the p-value would have been much lower than that originally found in
question 1. This p-value would have been less sensitive and would have provided stronger evidence for the researcher's hypothesis. State the p-value, rounding to
5 decimal places.
QUESTION 5
O a. The manipulation of statistical analysis, perhaps unconsciously, to arrive at statistically significant results (p-values less than 0.05)
O b. A terrible cough that develops when calculating p-values
P-hacking is a definite concern in the research world. Look up this term and match it with the correct definition below.
OC. Hacking into another person's PC
O d. Unauthorized use of someone else's data
Save All Answers
QUESTION 6
Transcribed Image Text:494.T Death A The E E Untitle 2 Unbe Untitle V6 Lectu McGr ALEKS Re/Ap Bb 84752 TED Amy C Tal x t-test A blackboard.wccnet.edu/webapps/assessment/take/launch.jsp?course_assessment_id=_655580_1&course_id=_96297_1&content_id=_7095083_1&step=null | Apps WCC Gateway All apps | Microsof.. A Winter 2020 MTH... 36 Announcements -. O Launch Meeting -. * Question Completion Status: QUESTION 3 Many researchers tried to replicate the power posing research without success. One researcher ed a sample size of n=200 (100 in each group). Let's assume 86 of the 100 people in the high-power group in this new research took the gambling risk, and 79 of 00 people in the low-power group took the gambling risk. Perform a hypothesis test to again detect a difference between the proportions willing to gamble from the two power p ing groups, and state the resulting p-value. Round to 3 decimal places. .193 QUESTION 4 If Amy Cuddy and her research team originally established a sample size of n=200 (100 in each group) and then discovered that 86% of the high-power group (86 of 100) took a gambling risk while 60% of the low-power group (60 of 100) took the risk, then the p-value would have been much lower than that originally found in question 1. This p-value would have been less sensitive and would have provided stronger evidence for the researcher's hypothesis. State the p-value, rounding to 5 decimal places. QUESTION 5 O a. The manipulation of statistical analysis, perhaps unconsciously, to arrive at statistically significant results (p-values less than 0.05) O b. A terrible cough that develops when calculating p-values P-hacking is a definite concern in the research world. Look up this term and match it with the correct definition below. OC. Hacking into another person's PC O d. Unauthorized use of someone else's data Save All Answers QUESTION 6
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 3 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Linear Equations
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman