Q41 Suppose that Kayla and Josel trade only with each other, and agree to the following terms of trade: 5 units of food in exchange for 3 units of luxury goods. Additionally, Kayla consumes as many units of luxury goods as she can. Which of the following statement(s) is(are) NOT true? O A. Kayla's point of production is 10 units of food and O luxury goods. B. Josel's point of production is 0 units of food for 10 luxury goods. O C. Josel has an absolute advantage in the production of luxury goods. D. Kayla has a comparative advantage in producing food. E. None of the above.

Exploring Economics
8th Edition
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:Robert L. Sexton
Chapter10: Consumer Choice Theory
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 8P
icon
Related questions
Question

Hi could you please answer these questions thank you !

Q41
Suppose that Kayla and Josel trade only with each other, and agree to the following terms of
trade: 5 units of food in exchange for 3 units of luxury goods. Additionally, Kayla consumes as
many units of luxury goods as she can. Which of the following statement(s) is(are) NOT true?
O A. Kayla's point of production is 10 units of food and 0 luxury goods.
O B. Josel's point of production is O units of food for 10 luxury goods.
O C. Josel has an absolute advantage in the production of luxury goods.
D. Kayla has a comparative advantage in producing food.
O E. None of the above.
Save Answer
Q42
Erhan and Panikos produce hamburgers (H) and steaks (S). Suppose that the Erhan's PPF is
defined by 950QH +425Qs = 1900. What is the opportunity cost of one hamburger?
O A. 2 steaks.
O B. ½ steak.
C. 3 steaks.
O D. It depends on which axis the quantity of hamburgers is located.
O E. None of the above.
Save Answer
Q43
Erhan and Panikos produce hamburgers (H) and steaks (S). Suppose that Erhan's PPF is flatter
than Panikos' PPF, with the quantity of hamburgers on the horizontal axis. Given this
information, which of the following can you conclude?
O A. The opportunity cost of hamburgers is lower for Erhan than for Panikos.
O B. The relative price of hamburgers is lower for Erhan than for Panikos.
O C. Erhan has a comparative advantage in hamburgers.
O D. Panikos has a comparative advantage in hamburgers.
O E. Both statements A and C are correct.
Transcribed Image Text:Q41 Suppose that Kayla and Josel trade only with each other, and agree to the following terms of trade: 5 units of food in exchange for 3 units of luxury goods. Additionally, Kayla consumes as many units of luxury goods as she can. Which of the following statement(s) is(are) NOT true? O A. Kayla's point of production is 10 units of food and 0 luxury goods. O B. Josel's point of production is O units of food for 10 luxury goods. O C. Josel has an absolute advantage in the production of luxury goods. D. Kayla has a comparative advantage in producing food. O E. None of the above. Save Answer Q42 Erhan and Panikos produce hamburgers (H) and steaks (S). Suppose that the Erhan's PPF is defined by 950QH +425Qs = 1900. What is the opportunity cost of one hamburger? O A. 2 steaks. O B. ½ steak. C. 3 steaks. O D. It depends on which axis the quantity of hamburgers is located. O E. None of the above. Save Answer Q43 Erhan and Panikos produce hamburgers (H) and steaks (S). Suppose that Erhan's PPF is flatter than Panikos' PPF, with the quantity of hamburgers on the horizontal axis. Given this information, which of the following can you conclude? O A. The opportunity cost of hamburgers is lower for Erhan than for Panikos. O B. The relative price of hamburgers is lower for Erhan than for Panikos. O C. Erhan has a comparative advantage in hamburgers. O D. Panikos has a comparative advantage in hamburgers. O E. Both statements A and C are correct.
Expert Solution
Step 1

Since you have asked multiple questions, we will solve the first question for you. If you want any specific question to be solved then please specify the question number or post only that question. Thank you.

Absolute advantage refers to the ability to produce more goods using same resources or same quantity of goods with lesser resources than the competitor. Comparative advantage refers to the ability to produce goods and services at a lower opportunity cost than the competitor. 

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Utility Maximization
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Exploring Economics
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:
9781544336329
Author:
Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:
SAGE Publications, Inc
Micro Economics For Today
Micro Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:
9781337613064
Author:
Tucker, Irvin B.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Principles of Microeconomics
Principles of Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:
9781305156050
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou…
Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Cou…
Economics
ISBN:
9781285165875
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Economics For Today
Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:
9781337613040
Author:
Tucker
Publisher:
Cengage Learning