public class BloodData { } private String bloodType; private String rhFactor; //Define the default constructor. public BloodData() { bloodType = "0"; rhFactor = "+"; } //Define the parameterized constructor. public BloodData(String bType, String rh) { bloodType=bType; rhFactor = rh; } //Define the getter and setter methods. public void setBloodType (String bType) { bloodType=bType; } public String getBloodType() { return bloodType; } public void setRhFactor (String rh) { rhFactor = rh; } public String getRhFactor() { return rhFactor; }

public class BloodData { } private String bloodType; private String rhFactor; //Define the default constructor. public BloodData() { bloodType = "0"; rhFactor = "+"; } //Define the parameterized constructor. public BloodData(String bType, String rh) { bloodType=bType; rhFactor = rh; } //Define the getter and setter methods. public void setBloodType (String bType) { bloodType=bType; } public String getBloodType() { return bloodType; } public void setRhFactor (String rh) { rhFactor = rh; } public String getRhFactor() { return rhFactor; }

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Discuss 3 factors that led to object orientation.
Throughout your CS course, you were challenged to draw parallels between the items you've seen in object-oriented systems and those in real life. How did you feel about that?
Should we feel comfortable using the term "Object-Oriented"? Using objects as the fundamental constituents of code.
Create an Object-oriented model.
Can we call it "Object-Orientation" instead? The process of developing applications with objects in mind.
Can you explain the SOLID principles of object-oriented design? Do it asap
When adopting object-oriented design, everything is framed in terms of objects. How can a large (or complex) thing be divided up into its parts?
When creating with an object-oriented mentality, everything is seen through the lens of objects, rather than the world around them. How much of an intricate whole can be taken apart into its component parts?
Must we have a separate definition for "Object Oriented"? creation of software with an eye toward objects
When designing using an object-oriented approach, everything is seen in terms of objects. How can a large (or complex) thing be dissected into its constituent elements for analysis?