Provide a critical response to Nyes' approach of using "soft" power (smart power) to achieve state goals. His definition of power differs from neorealists like Waltz and Mearsheimer, is he correct in his assessment of power? Is soft power a good alternative to hard power? Why, why not?
-
Provide a critical response to Nyes' approach of using "soft" power (smart power) to achieve state goals. His definition of power differs from neorealists like Waltz and Mearsheimer, is he correct in his assessment of power? Is soft power a good alternative to hard power? Why, why not?
Soft power is the use of diplomatic, economic, and cultural influence to persuade other states to cooperate with one's own foreign policy objectives. Soft power can be used to build relationships and trust, increase access to resources, and improve understanding between countries. Hard power on the other hand, is the use of military, economic, and diplomatic pressure to compel other states to comply with one's own foreign policy objectives. It includes the use of sanctions, military force, and other forms of coercion to compel other states to act in accordance with one's own goals.
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
