Prove the time complexity of the Binary search algorithm using Masters theorem, identify all the terms in Masters theorem clearly in the proof def binarySearch(arr, I, r, x): if r >= 1: mid=1 + (r - 1) // 2 if arr[mid] == X: return mid elif arr[mid] > x: return binarySearch(arr, I, mid-1, x) else: return binarySearch(arr, mid + 1, r, x) else: return -1

Prove the time complexity of the Binary search algorithm using Masters theorem, identify all the terms in Masters theorem clearly in the proof def binarySearch(arr, I, r, x): if r >= 1: mid=1 + (r - 1) // 2 if arr[mid] == X: return mid elif arr[mid] > x: return binarySearch(arr, I, mid-1, x) else: return binarySearch(arr, mid + 1, r, x) else: return -1

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider the searching problem:Input: A sequence of n numbers A = [a1; a2; : : : ; an] and a value v.Output: An index i such that v = A[i] or the special value NILL if v does not appear in A.(i) Write pseudocode for linear search, which scans through the sequence, looking for v.(write the code)(ii) Using a loop invariant, prove that your algorithm is correct. proof by induction base case inductive step and proof of corretness
Consider the following algorithm that uses a sorted list of n elements (alist). What is the worst case runtime of this algorithm? for each element in alist 1. ask the user for an input, call it value 2. search value in alist using the binary search algorithm 3. if value exists in alist, print "successful" otherwise print "unsuccessful" Question 10 options: O(2^n) O(n log n) O(log n) O(n^2) O(n) O(1)
Fermat's "Little" Theorem states that whenever n is prime and a is an integer, a^n−1≡1modn Then 281825≡ 263 mod827. c) If a=146 and n=331, then efficiently compute 146332≡ mod331Use The Extended Euclidean Algorithm to compute281^1≡362 mod827. Then 281^825≡???mod827. c) If a=146 and n=331, then efficiently compute146^332≡ ???mod331
,,,,,,
Consider that we have the following list of integers in increasing order: 123456789 10 11 12 13 We want to find the Index of the element x5 using the following binarySearch procedure. How many times is binarySearch procedure called? procedure binarysearchl), ), K: Integers, 11 sn) m + /21 If xa then return m else it (xa and j>m) then return binarySearch(m+1jx) else returno Select one O a3 O b.4 O c2 O d.5
Question 2: Recurrences (a) Below is the pseudo-code for two algorithms: Practicel (A,s,f) and Practice2(A,s,f), which take as input a sorted array A, indexed from s to f. The algorithms make a call to Bsearch(A,s,f,k) which we saw in class. Determine the worst-case runtime recurrece for each algorithm: T1(n) and T2(n). Show that T(n) is O((log n)²) and T2(n) is O(n log n). Practicel (A,s,f) if s< f ql = L(s+ f)/2] if BSearch(A,s,ql,1) = true Practice2(A,s,f) if s < f if BSearch(A,s+1,f,1) = true return true return true else else return Practice2(A, s, f-1) return Practicel(A, ql+1, f) else else return false return false
For each question, an algorithm will be described that operates on N elements, and your answer should include: (a) a big-O expression that describes the total number of operations in the worst case (for ex- ample, O(N³)) (b) a description of how to achieve the same effect as the algorithm described, but achieved with a better big-O time bound (for example, "use mergesort instead of insertion sort") (c) the big-O time bound for your improved approach. Your improved algorithm does not need to be provably the best possible, but it should have a different and better big-O bound. (It may not be as simple as substituting one named algorithm for another; consider what is redundant about the work done by the existing algorithm.) You don't need to use pseudocode to describe your algorithms - the style used in the problem descriptions is also sufficient for your solutions. You can use pseudocode if you like. Do not write real code. If you wish to use an algorithm described in class, you can name…
Interchange Base Points AlgorithmOutput: a base B = [131,132..... 13j-1, 13L.+1, 13j, 13j+2, 13j+3..... 13k] for G; a strong generating set relative to B; procedure interchange(var B: sequence of points; vat S: set of elements; j: 1..k-1);Interchange Base Points AlgorithmInput: a group G; a base [131,132..... 13k] for G and a strong generating set; an integer j between 1 and k-l; Output: a base [131,132..... 13k] for G and a strong generating set.
Drive and analyze the worst-case complexity of binary search when n is power of 2.
Sorting a data set is an important sub-problem in data science. Given the size n of a data set, whichstatements are correct?a) Bubble Sort has worst-case run-time complexity O(n).b) Bubble Sort has worst-case run-time complexity O(n log N).c) Bubble Sort has worst-case run-time complexity O(n2).d) Merge Sort has worst-case run-time complexity O(n).e) Merge Sort has worst-case run-time complexity O(n log N).f) Merge Sort has worst-case run-time complexity O(n2).g) Quick Sort has worst-case run-time complexity O(n).h) Quick Sort has worst-case run-time complexity O(n log N).i) Quick Sort has worst-case run-time complexity O(n2).