protection (number them 1 to N). Someone is going to pick one e ect. Suppose that the attacker is going to attack site i with probal with probability p, of selecting site i. If you select the same site t u successfully defend that site. The choice of {q} and {p.} repres etively. that you successfully prevent the attack, given strategies (q.), {p.} in advance, how should you choose {p,} to maximize the probabili d you know that the defender is going to choose the best strategy the ting an attack, how should you choose your strategy to maximize ti uddress the probability of a successful defense from the perspecti possible defender. Consider as well the perspective of the defender t e-do 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 from this perspective, then argue what the 'final me. re imagine that a successful attack on site i will cost the defender C average cost of an attack, given strategies {g.}, {p.}?

A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
10th Edition
ISBN:9780134753119
Author:Sheldon Ross
Publisher:Sheldon Ross
Chapter1: Combinatorial Analysis
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1.1P: a. How many different 7-place license plates are possible if the first 2 places are for letters and...
icon
Related questions
Question
please send handwritten solution for bonus Question
Problem 2: Strategic Defense
There are N sites that need protection (number them 1 to N). Someone is going to pick one of them to attack,
and you must pick one to protect. Suppose that the attacker is going to attack site i with probability qi. You plan
on selecting a site to protect, with probability p; of selecting site i. If you select the same site to protect that the
attacker chooses to attack, you successfully defend that site. The choice of {q.} and {pi} represent the attacker's
and defender's strategy, respectively.
1) What is the probability that you successfully prevent the attack, given strategies {qi}, {pi}??
2) If you knew {q1,..qN} in advance, how should you choose {p;} to maximize the probability you successfully
prevent an attack?
3) If you are the attacker, and you know that the defender is going to choose the best strategy they can to maximize
the probability of preventing an attack, how should you choose your strategy to maximize the probability of a
successful attack?
4) Questions 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 address the probability of a successful defense from the perspective of the attacker
thinking about the best possible defender. Consider as well the perspective of the defender thinking about the
best possible attacker. Re-do 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 from this perspective, then argue what the 'final' strategies for each
player will be in this game.
In the questions that follow, we imagine that a successful attack on site i will cost the defender C,.
5) What is the expected or average cost of an attack, given strategies {q}, {p:}?
6) If you knew {q1,...,qN} in advance, how should you choose {p:} to minimize the expected cost of an attack?
7) If you were the attacker, and knew that your opponent was trying to minimize the expected cost of your attack,
how should you choose {q;} to maximize the expected cost of an attack? (Assume that your strategy is going
to leak to your opponent.)
8) Questions 2.5, 2.6, 2.7 address the problem of the expected cost of an attack from the perspective of the attacker
thinking about the best possible defender. Consider as well the the perspective of the defender thinking about
the best possible attacker. Re-do 2.5, 2.6, 2.7 from this perspective, then argue what the 'final' strategies for
each player will be in this game.
Bonus
Restricting ourselves to two sites, site A and site B, suppose that a successful attack on
site i gives a reuward of R, to the attacker, at cost C; to the defender. if the attacker wants to marimize their erpected
reward, and the defender wants to minimize their erpected cost, uwhat strategies should they follow, and why? What
if they had the opportunity to negotiate beforehand, how would that change things? Note, this will depend heavily on
how {RA, RB}, {Ca,CB} relate to each other.
Transcribed Image Text:Problem 2: Strategic Defense There are N sites that need protection (number them 1 to N). Someone is going to pick one of them to attack, and you must pick one to protect. Suppose that the attacker is going to attack site i with probability qi. You plan on selecting a site to protect, with probability p; of selecting site i. If you select the same site to protect that the attacker chooses to attack, you successfully defend that site. The choice of {q.} and {pi} represent the attacker's and defender's strategy, respectively. 1) What is the probability that you successfully prevent the attack, given strategies {qi}, {pi}?? 2) If you knew {q1,..qN} in advance, how should you choose {p;} to maximize the probability you successfully prevent an attack? 3) If you are the attacker, and you know that the defender is going to choose the best strategy they can to maximize the probability of preventing an attack, how should you choose your strategy to maximize the probability of a successful attack? 4) Questions 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 address the probability of a successful defense from the perspective of the attacker thinking about the best possible defender. Consider as well the perspective of the defender thinking about the best possible attacker. Re-do 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 from this perspective, then argue what the 'final' strategies for each player will be in this game. In the questions that follow, we imagine that a successful attack on site i will cost the defender C,. 5) What is the expected or average cost of an attack, given strategies {q}, {p:}? 6) If you knew {q1,...,qN} in advance, how should you choose {p:} to minimize the expected cost of an attack? 7) If you were the attacker, and knew that your opponent was trying to minimize the expected cost of your attack, how should you choose {q;} to maximize the expected cost of an attack? (Assume that your strategy is going to leak to your opponent.) 8) Questions 2.5, 2.6, 2.7 address the problem of the expected cost of an attack from the perspective of the attacker thinking about the best possible defender. Consider as well the the perspective of the defender thinking about the best possible attacker. Re-do 2.5, 2.6, 2.7 from this perspective, then argue what the 'final' strategies for each player will be in this game. Bonus Restricting ourselves to two sites, site A and site B, suppose that a successful attack on site i gives a reuward of R, to the attacker, at cost C; to the defender. if the attacker wants to marimize their erpected reward, and the defender wants to minimize their erpected cost, uwhat strategies should they follow, and why? What if they had the opportunity to negotiate beforehand, how would that change things? Note, this will depend heavily on how {RA, RB}, {Ca,CB} relate to each other.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 6 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
A First Course in Probability (10th Edition)
Probability
ISBN:
9780134753119
Author:
Sheldon Ross
Publisher:
PEARSON
A First Course in Probability
A First Course in Probability
Probability
ISBN:
9780321794772
Author:
Sheldon Ross
Publisher:
PEARSON