Proof of why the Copernican model is more compatible with explaining the solar system than the Ptolemaic model (Think of specific Galilean observations & retrograde motion)
Proof of why the Copernican model is more compatible with explaining the solar system than the Ptolemaic model (Think of specific Galilean observations & retrograde motion)
The Copernican model, proposed by Nicolaus Copernicus in the 16th century, and the Ptolemaic model, developed by Claudius Ptolemy in the 2nd century, were two competing theories that attempted to explain the motion of celestial bodies in the solar system. Ultimately, the Copernican model is more compatible with explaining the solar system due to several key observations and concepts, including the Galilean observations and the explanation of retrograde motion.
Galilean Observations: a. Moons of Jupiter: One of the most significant pieces of evidence in favor of the Copernican model was Galileo Galilei's discovery of the four largest moons of Jupiter (now known as the Galilean moons: Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto) in 1610. This observation provided direct evidence that celestial bodies could orbit something other than the Earth, contradicting the geocentric Ptolemaic model, which insisted that everything revolved around the Earth. In the Copernican model, the Earth was just one of several celestial bodies orbiting the Sun, consistent with Galileo's discovery.
b. Phases of Venus: Galileo also observed the changing phases of Venus, which could only be explained by the heliocentric nature of the Copernican model. As Venus orbits the Sun, it goes through phases similar to the Moon, ranging from crescent to full. These phases are a result of the varying angles between the Sun, Venus, and the Earth. The Ptolemaic model struggled to explain these phases because it insisted on placing Venus in epicycles around the Earth.
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
