Profit from perfect price discrimination (x) is $88200. (Enter your response as a whole number.) Corresponding consumer surplus is (enter your response as whole numbers): welfare is and deadweight loss is Profit from single-price profit-maximization is z = $44100. (Enter your response as a whole number.) Corresponding consumer surplus is (enter your response as whole numbers): welfare is and deadweight loss is CS=$0. W = $ 88200 DWL = $0. CS=$ 22050 W = $ 66150 DWL = $ 22050
Profit from perfect price discrimination (x) is $88200. (Enter your response as a whole number.) Corresponding consumer surplus is (enter your response as whole numbers): welfare is and deadweight loss is Profit from single-price profit-maximization is z = $44100. (Enter your response as a whole number.) Corresponding consumer surplus is (enter your response as whole numbers): welfare is and deadweight loss is CS=$0. W = $ 88200 DWL = $0. CS=$ 22050 W = $ 66150 DWL = $ 22050
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
Related questions
Question
![### Economic Analysis of Monopoly Pricing
If a monopoly faces an inverse demand curve of:
\[ p = 450 - Q \]
and has a constant marginal and average cost of $30, it can perfectly price discriminate. The following outlines the economic outcomes in terms of profit, consumer surplus, welfare, and deadweight loss under both perfect price discrimination and single-price profit-maximization scenarios.
#### Perfect Price Discrimination
- **Profit (\(\pi\))**: $88,200
- **Consumer Surplus (CS)**: $0
- **Welfare (\(W\))**: $88,200
- **Deadweight Loss (DWL)**: $0
In this scenario, the firm captures all consumer surplus, maximizing its own profit and ensuring total welfare with no deadweight loss.
#### Single-Price Profit Maximization
- **Profit (\(\pi\))**: $44,100
- **Consumer Surplus (CS)**: $22,050
- **Welfare (\(W\))**: $66,150
- **Deadweight Loss (DWL)**: $22,050
Here, the monopoly charges a single price, resulting in a lower profit compared to perfect price discrimination. However, some consumer surplus remains, and there is a deadweight loss due to inefficiencies in resource allocation.
#### Conclusion
- Perfect price discrimination benefits the monopolist by extracting maximum profit with no deadweight loss, but offers no consumer surplus.
- Single-price maximization retains partial consumer surplus but creates a deadweight loss due to reduced efficiency. Total welfare is lower compared to perfect price discrimination.
This analysis illustrates the trade-offs between different monopoly pricing strategies and their implications on market efficiency and consumer welfare.](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2Fa99fb010-eebf-4f17-aa9e-4402ea5791d4%2F81c503e3-68c6-448a-ad03-1be39e539293%2Fb9rfhv_processed.png&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:### Economic Analysis of Monopoly Pricing
If a monopoly faces an inverse demand curve of:
\[ p = 450 - Q \]
and has a constant marginal and average cost of $30, it can perfectly price discriminate. The following outlines the economic outcomes in terms of profit, consumer surplus, welfare, and deadweight loss under both perfect price discrimination and single-price profit-maximization scenarios.
#### Perfect Price Discrimination
- **Profit (\(\pi\))**: $88,200
- **Consumer Surplus (CS)**: $0
- **Welfare (\(W\))**: $88,200
- **Deadweight Loss (DWL)**: $0
In this scenario, the firm captures all consumer surplus, maximizing its own profit and ensuring total welfare with no deadweight loss.
#### Single-Price Profit Maximization
- **Profit (\(\pi\))**: $44,100
- **Consumer Surplus (CS)**: $22,050
- **Welfare (\(W\))**: $66,150
- **Deadweight Loss (DWL)**: $22,050
Here, the monopoly charges a single price, resulting in a lower profit compared to perfect price discrimination. However, some consumer surplus remains, and there is a deadweight loss due to inefficiencies in resource allocation.
#### Conclusion
- Perfect price discrimination benefits the monopolist by extracting maximum profit with no deadweight loss, but offers no consumer surplus.
- Single-price maximization retains partial consumer surplus but creates a deadweight loss due to reduced efficiency. Total welfare is lower compared to perfect price discrimination.
This analysis illustrates the trade-offs between different monopoly pricing strategies and their implications on market efficiency and consumer welfare.
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps

Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, economics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you


Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON


Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON

Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education