Problems4.1. Using the nearly free-electron approximation for a one-dimensional (1-D)crystal lattice and assuming that the only nonvanishing Fourier coefficientsof the crystal potential are v(7/a) and v(-A/a) in (4.73), show that near theband edge at k = 0, the dependence of electron energy on the wave vectork is given byEk = Eo +2m*where m* = mo[1 – (32m,a*/h*n*)v(n/a)²]¬l is the effective mass of the-electron at k = 0.4.2. The E-k relation of a simple cubic lattice given by (4.79) is derived fromthe tight-binding approximation. Show that near k 0 this relation can beexpressed byEx == Eno +2m*where m* = h? /2B,a?.And for k T/a, show that the E-k relation is given byE = Eno +2m*where m* == -n² /2B,a?.

Answered: Image /qna-images/answer/4d222e00-9485-4212-a1ef-3fda29016f9f.jpg

Problems 4.1. Using the nearly free-electron approximation for a one-dimensional (1-D) crystal lattice and assuming that the only nonvanishing Fourier coefficients of the crystal potential are v(7/a) and v(-n/a) in (4.73), show that near the band edge at k = 0, the dependence of electron energy on the wave vector k is given by Ek = Eo + 2m* where m* = mo[l – (32mža*/h*n*)v(7/a)²]¬l is the effective mass of the electron at k = 0. %3D - %3D 4.2. The E-k relation of a simple cubic lattice given by (4.79) is derived from the tight-binding approximation. Show that near k 0 this relation can be expressed by ħ?k? Ek = Eno + 2m* where m* = h2 /2B,a². And for k 7/a, show that the E-k relation is given by Ek = Eno + 2m* where m* = %3D

Problems 4.1. Using the nearly free-electron approximation for a one-dimensional (1-D) crystal lattice and assuming that the only nonvanishing Fourier coefficients of the crystal potential are v(7/a) and v(-n/a) in (4.73), show that near the band edge at k = 0, the dependence of electron energy on the wave vector k is given by Ek = Eo + 2m* where m* = mo[l – (32mža/hn)v(7/a)²]¬l is the effective mass of the electron at k = 0. %3D - %3D 4.2. The E-k relation of a simple cubic lattice given by (4.79) is derived from the tight-binding approximation. Show that near k 0 this relation can be expressed by ħ?k? Ek = Eno + 2m where m* = h2 /2B,a². And for k 7/a, show that the E-k relation is given by Ek = Eno + 2m* where m* = %3D

Chemistry

10th Edition

ISBN:9781305957404

Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste

Publisher:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste

Chapter1: Chemical Foundations

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1RQ: Define and explain the differences between the following terms. a. law and theory b. theory and...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

For each of the following ions, draw diagrams (on a piece of paper), like the one to the right below, to show orbital occupancies for both weak and strong octahedral fields. Indicate (on the table below) the total number of unpaired electrons in each case. Ion # UnpairedWeak field # UnpairedStrong field (a) Rh4+ (b) Ni2+ (c) Fe2+ (d) Nb2+ (e) Cr4+
= MnAs has the hexagonal NiAs-type structure, a = 3.72 A and C 5.71 Å. can you calculate both (a) Mn - As distance, and (b) two Mn - Mn distances, and (c) As - As distance, and (d) coordination environments of Mn and As
3. (c)) Fe(CN),]³- exhibits two sets of charge transfer absorptions in visible and ultraviolet region but [Fe(CN),]*¯ shows 11 only one absorption in the ultraviolet region. Explain.
Please provide a justification for the following statement: lithium chloride dissolves in polarorganic solvents. What would you expect for other group I metal halides?
Q5. Fill in the following table the correct values for F(CO) in the following complexes ((2055, 2090 cm),(1783, 1915 cm) and (1746, 1888 cm ¹)) Complex V(CO) cm (PF), Mg(CO)s (PyMo(CO) (CHIẾN)Mo(CO
Consider the octahedral complex [FeBr6] 4−. In water solution it has an absorption peak at 864 nm with a molar absorptivity (ε) of 3.6 L mol-1 cm-1 . (I have a, b, and c, I need help with d, e, and f.) (a) What is the energy (in wavenumbers, cm-1 ) of the absorption peak? Show all work. (b) How many valence d electrons does the metal center have? Justify your answer. (c) How many unpaired electrons per molecule would a magnetic susceptibility experiment predict? What would the S number be for this transition metal center? Justify your answers. (d) What electronic transition results from absorption of 864-nm light? (e) Calculate the ligand stabilization energy (in units of ∆o) and units of coulombic (Πc) energy. (f) How would the ligand field strengths (∆o) of [Fe(NH3)6] 2+ and [Fe(bipy)3] 2+ differ from that of [FeBr6] 4−? Why?
8:10 E1 ll 92% 1) You 5 minutes ago 10. Discuss on the possible metals and their alloys which could be an ideal choice for replacement of finger joints. What are the relevant properties of this material?
1c
Which dn electron configurations are expected to undergo a Jahn–Teller distortion in a tetrahedral coordination compound? Explain your answer.
Solid Mg2B205 contains the "pyroborate" anion. Draw the structure for this ion. What are other isoelectronic species? asap please.
“Mango-globin” is a hemoglobin variant in which the iron atoms in each subunit have been substituted with manganese atoms. Mango-globin binds to oxygen at very high partial pressures, but does not exhibit any cooperativity. Propose an explanation for this observation. (Hint: the ionic radius of Fe2+ is 77 pm; the ionic radius of Mn2+ is 82 pm.) The free energy change for a chemical reaction is defined as follows: ∆?!= ∆? ̊!+ RT ln [products] / [reactants] When a reaction is at equilibrium, ∆G’ = 0, and this expression simplifies to: ∆? ̊!= −RT ln [products] / [reactants] At equilibrium, the ratio of product to reactant concentrations is nothing more than the equilibrium constant, Keq, for the reaction. Under these conditions: ∆G ̊’ = -RT ln Keq
Why Cs2[Cu(CN)4] doesn't exhibit a Jahn-Teller distortion