Problem 8-34 Variable versus Absorption Costing (LO 8-1, 8-4) Outback Corporation manufactures tactical LED flashlights in Brisbane, Australia. The firm uses an absorption costing system for internal reporting purposes; however, the company is considering using varia costing. Data regarding Outback's planned and actual operations for 20x1 follow: Budgeted Costs Total $1,647,000 1,336,500 648,000 594,000 1,026,000 985,500 405,000 297,000 Per Unit Actual Costs $1,549,400 1,257,300 609,600 602,000 881,600 985,500 348,000 303,000 $6,536,400 Direct material 12.20 Direct labor Variable manufacturing overhead Fixed manufacturing overhead Variable selling expenses Fixed selling expenses Variable administrative expenses Fixed administrative expenses 9.90 4.80 4.40 7.60 7.30 3.00 2.20 Total 51.40 $6,939,000 Beginning finished-goods inventory in units Sales in units Production in units Planned Activity 42,000 135.000 Actual Activity 42,000 116,000 127,000 135,000

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
10th Edition
ISBN:9781259964947
Author:Libby
Publisher:Libby
Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1Q
icon
Related questions
icon
Concept explainers
Topic Video
Question

1)Compute the value of Outback Corporation’s 20x1 ending finished-goods inventory under absorption costing. (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

 
 
 
 
Value of finished-goods inventory  

2)

Compute the value of Outback Corporation’s 20x1 ending finished-goods inventory under variable costing. (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

 
 
 
 
Value of finished-goods inventory  

 

3) 

Compute the difference between Outback Corporation’s 20x1 reported operating income calculated under absorption costing and calculated under variable costing. (Do not round intermediate calculations.)

 
 
 
 
Difference in reported income  
Problem 8-34 Variable versus Absorption Costing (LO 8-1, 8-4)
Outback Corporation manufactures tactical LED flashlights in Brisbane, Australia. The firm uses an absorption costing system for internal reporting purposes; however, the company is considering using variable
costing. Data regarding Outback's planned and actual operations for 20x1 follow:
Budgeted Costs
Per Unit
12.20
Total
Actual Costs
$ 1,647,000
1,336,500
648,000
594,000
1,026,000
985,500
405,000
297,000
$6,939,000
$ 1,549,400
1,257,300
609,600
602,000
881,600
985,500
348,000
303,000
$6,536,400
$
Direct material
Direct labor
9.90
Variable manufacturing overhead
Fixed manufacturing overhead
Variable selling expenses
Fixed selling expenses
Variable administrative expenses
Fixed administrative expenses
4.80
4.40
7.60
7.30
3.00
2.20
Total
$
51.40
Planned Activity
42,000
135,000
135,000
Actual Activity
42,000
116,000
127,000
Beginning finished-goods inventory in units
Sales in units
Production in units
The budgeted per-unit cost figures were based on Outback producing and selling 135,000 units in 20x1. Outback uses a predetermined overhead rate for applying manufacturing overhead to its product. A total
manufacturing overhead rate of $9.20 per unit was employed for absorption costing purposes in 20x1. Any overapplied or underapplied manufacturing overhead is closed to the Cost of Goods Sold account at the end
of the year. The 20x1 beginning finished-goods inventory for absorption costing purposes was valued at the 20x0 budgeted unit manufacturing cost, which was the same as the 20x1 budgeted unit manufacturing
cost. There are no work-in-process inventories at either the beginning or the end of the year. The planned and actual unit selling price for 20x1 was $71.50 per unit.
Required:
Was Outback's 20x1 operating income higher under absorption costing or variable costing?
Also, compute the following:
1. The value of Outback Corporation's 20x1 ending finished-goods inventory under absorption costing.
2. The value of Outback Corporation's 20x1 ending finished-goods inventory under variable costing.
3. The difference between Outback Corporation's 20x1 reported operating income calculated under absorption costing and calculated under variable costing.
Transcribed Image Text:Problem 8-34 Variable versus Absorption Costing (LO 8-1, 8-4) Outback Corporation manufactures tactical LED flashlights in Brisbane, Australia. The firm uses an absorption costing system for internal reporting purposes; however, the company is considering using variable costing. Data regarding Outback's planned and actual operations for 20x1 follow: Budgeted Costs Per Unit 12.20 Total Actual Costs $ 1,647,000 1,336,500 648,000 594,000 1,026,000 985,500 405,000 297,000 $6,939,000 $ 1,549,400 1,257,300 609,600 602,000 881,600 985,500 348,000 303,000 $6,536,400 $ Direct material Direct labor 9.90 Variable manufacturing overhead Fixed manufacturing overhead Variable selling expenses Fixed selling expenses Variable administrative expenses Fixed administrative expenses 4.80 4.40 7.60 7.30 3.00 2.20 Total $ 51.40 Planned Activity 42,000 135,000 135,000 Actual Activity 42,000 116,000 127,000 Beginning finished-goods inventory in units Sales in units Production in units The budgeted per-unit cost figures were based on Outback producing and selling 135,000 units in 20x1. Outback uses a predetermined overhead rate for applying manufacturing overhead to its product. A total manufacturing overhead rate of $9.20 per unit was employed for absorption costing purposes in 20x1. Any overapplied or underapplied manufacturing overhead is closed to the Cost of Goods Sold account at the end of the year. The 20x1 beginning finished-goods inventory for absorption costing purposes was valued at the 20x0 budgeted unit manufacturing cost, which was the same as the 20x1 budgeted unit manufacturing cost. There are no work-in-process inventories at either the beginning or the end of the year. The planned and actual unit selling price for 20x1 was $71.50 per unit. Required: Was Outback's 20x1 operating income higher under absorption costing or variable costing? Also, compute the following: 1. The value of Outback Corporation's 20x1 ending finished-goods inventory under absorption costing. 2. The value of Outback Corporation's 20x1 ending finished-goods inventory under variable costing. 3. The difference between Outback Corporation's 20x1 reported operating income calculated under absorption costing and calculated under variable costing.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Costing Systems
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259964947
Author:
Libby
Publisher:
MCG
Accounting
Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337272094
Author:
WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337619202
Author:
Hall, James A.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis…
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis…
Accounting
ISBN:
9780134475585
Author:
Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. Rajan
Publisher:
PEARSON
Intermediate Accounting
Intermediate Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259722660
Author:
J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M Thomas
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259726705
Author:
John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting Principles
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education