Problem #4: We would like to conduct a hypothesis test at the 4% level of significance to determine whether the true mean score of all players in a particular bowling league differs from 140. The mean and standard deviation of the scores of 13 randomly selected players are calculated to be 143 and 15.3, respectively. Scores of all players in the league are known to follow a normal distribution with standard deviation 18.3. We find that our test statistic does not fall in our rejection region, and so we conclude: (A) We fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude at the 4% level of significance that we have insufficient evidence that the true mean scores of all players in that bowling league is smaller than 140. (B) We reject the null hypothesis and conclude at the 4% level of significance that we have sufficient evidence that the true mean scores of all players in that bowling league differs from 140. (C) We fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude at the 4% level of significance that we have insufficient evidence that the true mean scores of all players in that bowling league differs from 140. (D) We reject the null hypothesis and conclude at the 4% level of significance that we have insufficient evidence that the true mean scores of all players in that bowling league is greater than 140. (E) We reject the null hypothesis and conclude at the 4% level of significance that we have sufficient evidence that the true mean scores of all players in that bowling league is smaller than 140. (F) We reject the null hypothesis and conclude at the 4% level of significance that we have insufficient evidence that the true mean scores of all players in that bowling league differs from 140. (G) We fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude at the 4% level of significance that we have sufficient evidence that the true mean scores of all players in that bowling league is larger than 140. (H) We fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude at the 4% level of significance that we have sufficient evidence that the true mean scores of all players in that bowling league differs from 140.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question

can you please show the step by step solution. please do not skip steps. Explain how you got the answer you did

Problem #4: We would like to conduct a hypothesis test at the 4% level of significance to determine whether the true mean
score of all players in a particular bowling league differs from 140. The mean and standard deviation of the
scores of 13 randomly selected players are calculated to be 143 and 15.3, respectively. Scores of all players in the
league are known to follow a normal distribution with standard deviation 18.3. We find that our test statistic does
not fall in our rejection region, and so we conclude:
(A) We fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude at the 4% level of significance that we
have insufficient evidence that the true mean scores of all players in that bowling league is smaller than 140.
(B) We reject the null hypothesis and conclude at the 4% level of significance that we
have sufficient evidence that the true mean scores of all players in that bowling league differs from 140.
(C) We fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude at the 4% level of significance that we
have insufficient evidence that the true mean scores of all players in that bowling league differs from 140.
(D) We reject the null hypothesis and conclude at the 4% level of significance that we
have insufficient evidence that the true mean scores of all players in that bowling league is greater than 140.
(E) We reject the null hypothesis and conclude at the 4% level of significance that we
have sufficient evidence that the true mean scores of all players in that bowling league is smaller than 140.
(F) We reject the null hypothesis and conclude at the 4% level of significance that we
have insufficient evidence that the true mean scores of all players in that bowling league differs from 140.
(G) We fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude at the 4% level of significance that we
have sufficient evidence that the true mean scores of all players in that bowling league is larger than 140.
(H) We fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude at the 4% level of significance that we
have sufficient evidence that the true mean scores of all players in that bowling league differs from 140.
Transcribed Image Text:Problem #4: We would like to conduct a hypothesis test at the 4% level of significance to determine whether the true mean score of all players in a particular bowling league differs from 140. The mean and standard deviation of the scores of 13 randomly selected players are calculated to be 143 and 15.3, respectively. Scores of all players in the league are known to follow a normal distribution with standard deviation 18.3. We find that our test statistic does not fall in our rejection region, and so we conclude: (A) We fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude at the 4% level of significance that we have insufficient evidence that the true mean scores of all players in that bowling league is smaller than 140. (B) We reject the null hypothesis and conclude at the 4% level of significance that we have sufficient evidence that the true mean scores of all players in that bowling league differs from 140. (C) We fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude at the 4% level of significance that we have insufficient evidence that the true mean scores of all players in that bowling league differs from 140. (D) We reject the null hypothesis and conclude at the 4% level of significance that we have insufficient evidence that the true mean scores of all players in that bowling league is greater than 140. (E) We reject the null hypothesis and conclude at the 4% level of significance that we have sufficient evidence that the true mean scores of all players in that bowling league is smaller than 140. (F) We reject the null hypothesis and conclude at the 4% level of significance that we have insufficient evidence that the true mean scores of all players in that bowling league differs from 140. (G) We fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude at the 4% level of significance that we have sufficient evidence that the true mean scores of all players in that bowling league is larger than 140. (H) We fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude at the 4% level of significance that we have sufficient evidence that the true mean scores of all players in that bowling league differs from 140.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman