Problem 2: Metric Spaces of Continuous Functions and Graph Representations Background: Consider the space C([0, 1], R) of continuous real-valued functions on the interval [0, 1], equipped with the supremum norm ||f||∞ = sup Tasks: Pze[0,1] ||f(x)|. a. Graph Construction for Function Spaces: Define a graph H where each vertex represents a function f = C([0, 1], R). Connect two vertices ƒ and g with an edge if ||fg||∞ < € for some fixed € > 0. Discuss the resulting graph's properties, such as connectivity and diameter, in relation to the completeness and compactness of C([0, 1], R). b. Isometry and Graph Isomorphism: Suppose : C([0, 1], R) → C([0, 1], R) is an isometry with respect to the supremum norm. Show that induces an isomorphism between the corresponding graphs H. Use this to deduce properties about &, potentially leveraging the Banach-Stone theorem. c. Graph-Based Compactness Criteria: Utilize the graph H to formulate and prove a compactness criterion for subsets of C([0, 1], R). Specifically, relate the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem to graph-theoretic notions such as finite coverings or graph limits. d. Embedding Metric Spaces into Graphs: Given a general metric space (X, d), describe a procedure to embed X into a graph in a way that preserves metric properties relevant to functional analysis (e.g., completeness, separability). Apply this procedure to C([0, 1], R) and discuss the implications for functional analysis on this space. 3 K 5 8 K -4.2 -2.5 0 1.7 d(1.7, 2.5) 11.7 (-2.5) |= 4.2 - = - d(3, 8) 13 81-5 Fig. 2. Distance on R x, y = R. Figure 2 illustrates the notation. In the plane and in “ordi- nary" three-dimensional space the situation is similar. In functional analysis we shall study more general "spaces" and "functions" defined on them. We arrive at a sufficiently general and flexible concept of a "space" as follows. We replace the set of real numbers underlying R by an abstract set X (set of elements whose nature is left unspecified) and introduce on X a "distance function" which has only a few of the most fundamental properties of the distance function on R. But what do we mean by "most fundamental"? This question is far from being trivial. In fact, the choice and formula- tion of axioms in a definition always needs experience, familiarity with practical problems and a clear idea of the goal to be reached. In the present case, a development of over sixty years has led to the following concept which is basic and very useful in functional analysis and its applications. 1.1-1 Definition (Metric space, metric). A metric space is a pair (X, d), where X is a set and d is a metric on X (or distance function on X), that is, a function defined² on XXX such that for all x, y, z= X we have: (M1) d is real-valued, finite and nonnegative. (M2) d(x, y)=0 if and only if x = y. (M3) d(x, y) = d(y, x) (Symmetry). (M4) d(x, y)d(x, z)+d(z, y) (Triangle inequality). ■

Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
13th Edition
ISBN:9781133382119
Author:Swokowski
Publisher:Swokowski
Chapter4: Polynomial And Rational Functions
Section4.5: Rational Functions
Problem 48E
Question
100%

Make sure to answer by hand, make all graphs and give steps how you constructed these, DO NOT SOLVE USING AI

USE : https://drive.google.com/file/d/1a2B3cDeFgHiJkLmNoPqRsTuVwXyZz0/view?usp=sharing

For the reference, and the book kreyszig can be used, 

Problem 2: Metric Spaces of Continuous Functions and Graph
Representations
Background: Consider the space C([0, 1], R) of continuous real-valued functions on the interval
[0, 1], equipped with the supremum norm ||f||∞ = sup
Tasks:
Pze[0,1]
||f(x)|.
a. Graph Construction for Function Spaces: Define a graph H where each vertex represents a function
f = C([0, 1], R). Connect two vertices ƒ and g with an edge if ||fg||∞ < € for some fixed
€ > 0. Discuss the resulting graph's properties, such as connectivity and diameter, in relation to the
completeness and compactness of C([0, 1], R).
b. Isometry and Graph Isomorphism: Suppose : C([0, 1], R) → C([0, 1], R) is an isometry with
respect to the supremum norm. Show that induces an isomorphism between the corresponding
graphs H. Use this to deduce properties about &, potentially leveraging the Banach-Stone theorem.
c. Graph-Based Compactness Criteria: Utilize the graph H to formulate and prove a compactness
criterion for subsets of C([0, 1], R). Specifically, relate the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem to graph-theoretic
notions such as finite coverings or graph limits.
d. Embedding Metric Spaces into Graphs: Given a general metric space (X, d), describe a procedure
to embed X into a graph in a way that preserves metric properties relevant to functional analysis
(e.g., completeness, separability). Apply this procedure to C([0, 1], R) and discuss the implications
for functional analysis on this space.
Transcribed Image Text:Problem 2: Metric Spaces of Continuous Functions and Graph Representations Background: Consider the space C([0, 1], R) of continuous real-valued functions on the interval [0, 1], equipped with the supremum norm ||f||∞ = sup Tasks: Pze[0,1] ||f(x)|. a. Graph Construction for Function Spaces: Define a graph H where each vertex represents a function f = C([0, 1], R). Connect two vertices ƒ and g with an edge if ||fg||∞ < € for some fixed € > 0. Discuss the resulting graph's properties, such as connectivity and diameter, in relation to the completeness and compactness of C([0, 1], R). b. Isometry and Graph Isomorphism: Suppose : C([0, 1], R) → C([0, 1], R) is an isometry with respect to the supremum norm. Show that induces an isomorphism between the corresponding graphs H. Use this to deduce properties about &, potentially leveraging the Banach-Stone theorem. c. Graph-Based Compactness Criteria: Utilize the graph H to formulate and prove a compactness criterion for subsets of C([0, 1], R). Specifically, relate the Arzelà-Ascoli theorem to graph-theoretic notions such as finite coverings or graph limits. d. Embedding Metric Spaces into Graphs: Given a general metric space (X, d), describe a procedure to embed X into a graph in a way that preserves metric properties relevant to functional analysis (e.g., completeness, separability). Apply this procedure to C([0, 1], R) and discuss the implications for functional analysis on this space.
3
K 5
8
K -4.2
-2.5
0
1.7
d(1.7, 2.5) 11.7 (-2.5) |= 4.2
-
=
-
d(3, 8) 13 81-5
Fig. 2. Distance on R
x, y = R. Figure 2 illustrates the notation. In the plane and in “ordi-
nary" three-dimensional space the situation is similar.
In functional analysis we shall study more general "spaces" and
"functions" defined on them. We arrive at a sufficiently general and
flexible concept of a "space" as follows. We replace the set of real
numbers underlying R by an abstract set X (set of elements whose
nature is left unspecified) and introduce on X a "distance function"
which has only a few of the most fundamental properties of the
distance function on R. But what do we mean by "most fundamental"?
This question is far from being trivial. In fact, the choice and formula-
tion of axioms in a definition always needs experience, familiarity with
practical problems and a clear idea of the goal to be reached. In the
present case, a development of over sixty years has led to the following
concept which is basic and very useful in functional analysis and its
applications.
1.1-1 Definition (Metric space, metric). A metric space is a pair
(X, d), where X is a set and d is a metric on X (or distance function on
X), that is, a function defined² on XXX such that for all x, y, z= X we
have:
(M1)
d is real-valued, finite and nonnegative.
(M2)
d(x, y)=0 if and only if
x = y.
(M3)
d(x, y) = d(y, x)
(Symmetry).
(M4)
d(x, y)d(x, z)+d(z, y)
(Triangle inequality). ■
Transcribed Image Text:3 K 5 8 K -4.2 -2.5 0 1.7 d(1.7, 2.5) 11.7 (-2.5) |= 4.2 - = - d(3, 8) 13 81-5 Fig. 2. Distance on R x, y = R. Figure 2 illustrates the notation. In the plane and in “ordi- nary" three-dimensional space the situation is similar. In functional analysis we shall study more general "spaces" and "functions" defined on them. We arrive at a sufficiently general and flexible concept of a "space" as follows. We replace the set of real numbers underlying R by an abstract set X (set of elements whose nature is left unspecified) and introduce on X a "distance function" which has only a few of the most fundamental properties of the distance function on R. But what do we mean by "most fundamental"? This question is far from being trivial. In fact, the choice and formula- tion of axioms in a definition always needs experience, familiarity with practical problems and a clear idea of the goal to be reached. In the present case, a development of over sixty years has led to the following concept which is basic and very useful in functional analysis and its applications. 1.1-1 Definition (Metric space, metric). A metric space is a pair (X, d), where X is a set and d is a metric on X (or distance function on X), that is, a function defined² on XXX such that for all x, y, z= X we have: (M1) d is real-valued, finite and nonnegative. (M2) d(x, y)=0 if and only if x = y. (M3) d(x, y) = d(y, x) (Symmetry). (M4) d(x, y)d(x, z)+d(z, y) (Triangle inequality). ■
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 6 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra & Trigonometry with Analytic Geometry
Algebra
ISBN:
9781133382119
Author:
Swokowski
Publisher:
Cengage
Algebra for College Students
Algebra for College Students
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285195780
Author:
Jerome E. Kaufmann, Karen L. Schwitters
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
College Algebra
College Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781305115545
Author:
James Stewart, Lothar Redlin, Saleem Watson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning