Problem 13-25 (Algo) Certainty equivalent approach [LO13-1) Sheila Goodman recently received her MBA from the Harvard Business School. She has joined the family business, Goodman Software Products Incorporated, as Vice-President of Finance. She believes in adjusting projects for risk. Her father is somewhat skeptical but agrees to go along with her. Her approach is somewhat different than the risk-adjusted discount rate approach, but achieves the same objective. She suggests that the inflows for each year of a project be adjusted downward for lack of certainty and then be discounted back at a risk-free rate. The theory is that the adjustment penalty makes the inflows the equivalent of risk-less inflows, and therefore a risk-free rate is justified. A table showing the possible coefficient of variation for an inflow and the associated adjustment factor is shown next; Coefficient of Variation 0 -0.25 0.26 0.50 0.51 0.75 0.76 1.00 1.01 1.25 Assume a $173,000 project provides the following inflows with the associated coefficients of variation for each year. Coefficient of Variation 0.11 Year 1 Inflow. $ 39,600 56,500 79,700 61,700 61,700 Use Appendix B for an approximate answer but calculate your final answer using the formula and financial calculator methods. Adjustment Factor 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 2 3 4 5 Year 1 2 0.24 0.55 0.79 1.04 a. Fill in the table below: Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. Round "Adjustment Factor" answers to 2 decimal places and other answers to the nearest whole dollar. Adjustment Factor Adjusted Inflow
Problem 13-25 (Algo) Certainty equivalent approach [LO13-1) Sheila Goodman recently received her MBA from the Harvard Business School. She has joined the family business, Goodman Software Products Incorporated, as Vice-President of Finance. She believes in adjusting projects for risk. Her father is somewhat skeptical but agrees to go along with her. Her approach is somewhat different than the risk-adjusted discount rate approach, but achieves the same objective. She suggests that the inflows for each year of a project be adjusted downward for lack of certainty and then be discounted back at a risk-free rate. The theory is that the adjustment penalty makes the inflows the equivalent of risk-less inflows, and therefore a risk-free rate is justified. A table showing the possible coefficient of variation for an inflow and the associated adjustment factor is shown next; Coefficient of Variation 0 -0.25 0.26 0.50 0.51 0.75 0.76 1.00 1.01 1.25 Assume a $173,000 project provides the following inflows with the associated coefficients of variation for each year. Coefficient of Variation 0.11 Year 1 Inflow. $ 39,600 56,500 79,700 61,700 61,700 Use Appendix B for an approximate answer but calculate your final answer using the formula and financial calculator methods. Adjustment Factor 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 2 3 4 5 Year 1 2 0.24 0.55 0.79 1.04 a. Fill in the table below: Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. Round "Adjustment Factor" answers to 2 decimal places and other answers to the nearest whole dollar. Adjustment Factor Adjusted Inflow
Essentials Of Investments
11th Edition
ISBN:9781260013924
Author:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Chapter1: Investments: Background And Issues
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1PS
Related questions
Question
Vaibhav
![Problem 13-25 (Algo) Certainty equivalent approach [LO13-1]
Sheila Goodman recently received her MBA from the Harvard Business School. She has joined the family business, Goodman Software
Products Incorporated, as Vice-President of Finance. She believes in adjusting projects for risk. Her father is somewhat skeptical but
agrees to go along with her. Her approach is somewhat different than the risk-adjusted discount rate approach, but achieves the same
objective. She suggests that the inflows for each year of a project be adjusted downward for lack of certainty and then be discounted
back at a risk-free rate. The theory is that the adjustment penalty makes the inflows the equivalent of risk-less inflows, and therefore a
risk-free rate is justified.
A table showing the possible coefficient of variation for an inflow and the associated adjustment factor is shown next:
Coefficient of
Variation
0 0.25
8.26 0.50
0.51 -0.75
0.76 1.00
1.01 1.25
Year
1
Assume a $173,000 project provides the following inflows with the associated coefficients of variation for each year.
Coefficient of
Variation
0.11
0.24
0.55
0.79
1.04
Adjustment
Factor
0.90
Inflow
$ 39,600
56,500
79,700
61,700
61,700
Use Appendix B for an approximate answer but calculate your final answer using the formula and financial calculator methods.
a. Fill in the table below.
Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. Round "Adjustment Factor" answers to 2 decimal places and other answers to the
nearest whole dollar.
2
3
4
15
0.80
0.70
0.60
e.se
Year
1
2
3
Adjustment Factor Adjusted Inflow](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2F245f0205-cf64-4e7b-b7c8-eb5e5da979b8%2Fba0a843a-de11-4f88-9978-e2cc53c3ae34%2Fcysaq8_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:Problem 13-25 (Algo) Certainty equivalent approach [LO13-1]
Sheila Goodman recently received her MBA from the Harvard Business School. She has joined the family business, Goodman Software
Products Incorporated, as Vice-President of Finance. She believes in adjusting projects for risk. Her father is somewhat skeptical but
agrees to go along with her. Her approach is somewhat different than the risk-adjusted discount rate approach, but achieves the same
objective. She suggests that the inflows for each year of a project be adjusted downward for lack of certainty and then be discounted
back at a risk-free rate. The theory is that the adjustment penalty makes the inflows the equivalent of risk-less inflows, and therefore a
risk-free rate is justified.
A table showing the possible coefficient of variation for an inflow and the associated adjustment factor is shown next:
Coefficient of
Variation
0 0.25
8.26 0.50
0.51 -0.75
0.76 1.00
1.01 1.25
Year
1
Assume a $173,000 project provides the following inflows with the associated coefficients of variation for each year.
Coefficient of
Variation
0.11
0.24
0.55
0.79
1.04
Adjustment
Factor
0.90
Inflow
$ 39,600
56,500
79,700
61,700
61,700
Use Appendix B for an approximate answer but calculate your final answer using the formula and financial calculator methods.
a. Fill in the table below.
Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. Round "Adjustment Factor" answers to 2 decimal places and other answers to the
nearest whole dollar.
2
3
4
15
0.80
0.70
0.60
e.se
Year
1
2
3
Adjustment Factor Adjusted Inflow
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 3 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, finance and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Essentials Of Investments
Finance
ISBN:
9781260013924
Author:
Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:
Mcgraw-hill Education,
Essentials Of Investments
Finance
ISBN:
9781260013924
Author:
Bodie, Zvi, Kane, Alex, MARCUS, Alan J.
Publisher:
Mcgraw-hill Education,
Foundations Of Finance
Finance
ISBN:
9780134897264
Author:
KEOWN, Arthur J., Martin, John D., PETTY, J. William
Publisher:
Pearson,
Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Cou…
Finance
ISBN:
9781337395250
Author:
Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Corporate Finance (The Mcgraw-hill/Irwin Series i…
Finance
ISBN:
9780077861759
Author:
Stephen A. Ross Franco Modigliani Professor of Financial Economics Professor, Randolph W Westerfield Robert R. Dockson Deans Chair in Bus. Admin., Jeffrey Jaffe, Bradford D Jordan Professor
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education