To illustrate how you might approach assignment 2, question 1, here is an example. Statement: Let's show that the following statement does NOT hold. Єx € D, (M(x)) ^ ³x E D (P(x)) implies that 3x E D (M(x) ^ P(x)) Intuitively, this statement is not true because the x in both of the quantifiers in the first statement are not necessarily the same! So just because there is an element such that M is true and an element such that P is true, doesn't mean that there is one element where both of them is true. So, let's construct a set of elements that makes this true. Let D = {a, b}, and let M, P be defined on D: x P(x) M(x) a T F b F T So, we can verify the statements: • 3x E D, (M(x)) - yes, verified by the element b. • • 3x E D, ((P(x)) - yes, verified by the element a. ³x € D, (M(x)) ^ ³x E D (P(x)) - yes, as both of the previous two statements show. ³x € D, (M(x) ^ P(x)) – false. There is no element where both M and P are true. Therefore, the implication does not hold, as requested. Predicate Logic 1. Consider each of the following three statements. You can assume for each that D is a set and P and M are predicates over D. Show that each of the statements are not true. You should show this by giving an example of a situation where they are not equivalent, through providing a specific (small, non-empty) set D of elements and the values (T/F) of the predicates on each element of D. You do not have to define how P and M work, just what the result of the predicates are on each element of D. Be sure to explain your choices of set and predicate. a. (3x € D, P(x))^(3x € D, (P(x) = M(x))) implies that (3x = D, (P(x)^M(x))) b. vx € D, (M(x) = P(x)) implies that (3x = D‚¬M(x))^(3x = D, (M(x) ^ P(x)) c. (x = D. (M(x))) = (x = D, (P(x))) implies that vx = D, (M(x) = P(x)) C. ED
To illustrate how you might approach assignment 2, question 1, here is an example. Statement: Let's show that the following statement does NOT hold. Єx € D, (M(x)) ^ ³x E D (P(x)) implies that 3x E D (M(x) ^ P(x)) Intuitively, this statement is not true because the x in both of the quantifiers in the first statement are not necessarily the same! So just because there is an element such that M is true and an element such that P is true, doesn't mean that there is one element where both of them is true. So, let's construct a set of elements that makes this true. Let D = {a, b}, and let M, P be defined on D: x P(x) M(x) a T F b F T So, we can verify the statements: • 3x E D, (M(x)) - yes, verified by the element b. • • 3x E D, ((P(x)) - yes, verified by the element a. ³x € D, (M(x)) ^ ³x E D (P(x)) - yes, as both of the previous two statements show. ³x € D, (M(x) ^ P(x)) – false. There is no element where both M and P are true. Therefore, the implication does not hold, as requested. Predicate Logic 1. Consider each of the following three statements. You can assume for each that D is a set and P and M are predicates over D. Show that each of the statements are not true. You should show this by giving an example of a situation where they are not equivalent, through providing a specific (small, non-empty) set D of elements and the values (T/F) of the predicates on each element of D. You do not have to define how P and M work, just what the result of the predicates are on each element of D. Be sure to explain your choices of set and predicate. a. (3x € D, P(x))^(3x € D, (P(x) = M(x))) implies that (3x = D, (P(x)^M(x))) b. vx € D, (M(x) = P(x)) implies that (3x = D‚¬M(x))^(3x = D, (M(x) ^ P(x)) c. (x = D. (M(x))) = (x = D, (P(x))) implies that vx = D, (M(x) = P(x)) C. ED
Elements Of Modern Algebra
8th Edition
ISBN:9781285463230
Author:Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Publisher:Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Chapter2: The Integers
Section2.3: Divisibility
Problem 10TFE
Related questions
Question
This is the question with an example solution for it. Show all your work.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 18 images
Recommended textbooks for you
Elements Of Modern Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285463230
Author:
Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Algebra: Structure And Method, Book 1
Algebra
ISBN:
9780395977224
Author:
Richard G. Brown, Mary P. Dolciani, Robert H. Sorgenfrey, William L. Cole
Publisher:
McDougal Littell
Elementary Geometry For College Students, 7e
Geometry
ISBN:
9781337614085
Author:
Alexander, Daniel C.; Koeberlein, Geralyn M.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Elements Of Modern Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285463230
Author:
Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Algebra: Structure And Method, Book 1
Algebra
ISBN:
9780395977224
Author:
Richard G. Brown, Mary P. Dolciani, Robert H. Sorgenfrey, William L. Cole
Publisher:
McDougal Littell
Elementary Geometry For College Students, 7e
Geometry
ISBN:
9781337614085
Author:
Alexander, Daniel C.; Koeberlein, Geralyn M.
Publisher:
Cengage,