To illustrate how you might approach assignment 2, question 1, here is an example. Statement: Let's show that the following statement does NOT hold. Єx € D, (M(x)) ^ ³x E D (P(x)) implies that 3x E D (M(x) ^ P(x)) Intuitively, this statement is not true because the x in both of the quantifiers in the first statement are not necessarily the same! So just because there is an element such that M is true and an element such that P is true, doesn't mean that there is one element where both of them is true. So, let's construct a set of elements that makes this true. Let D = {a, b}, and let M, P be defined on D: x P(x) M(x) a T F b F T So, we can verify the statements: • 3x E D, (M(x)) - yes, verified by the element b. • • 3x E D, ((P(x)) - yes, verified by the element a. ³x € D, (M(x)) ^ ³x E D (P(x)) - yes, as both of the previous two statements show. ³x € D, (M(x) ^ P(x)) – false. There is no element where both M and P are true. Therefore, the implication does not hold, as requested. Predicate Logic 1. Consider each of the following three statements. You can assume for each that D is a set and P and M are predicates over D. Show that each of the statements are not true. You should show this by giving an example of a situation where they are not equivalent, through providing a specific (small, non-empty) set D of elements and the values (T/F) of the predicates on each element of D. You do not have to define how P and M work, just what the result of the predicates are on each element of D. Be sure to explain your choices of set and predicate. a. (3x € D, P(x))^(3x € D, (P(x) = M(x))) implies that (3x = D, (P(x)^M(x))) b. vx € D, (M(x) = P(x)) implies that (3x = D‚¬M(x))^(3x = D, (M(x) ^ P(x)) c. (x = D. (M(x))) = (x = D, (P(x))) implies that vx = D, (M(x) = P(x)) C. ED
To illustrate how you might approach assignment 2, question 1, here is an example. Statement: Let's show that the following statement does NOT hold. Єx € D, (M(x)) ^ ³x E D (P(x)) implies that 3x E D (M(x) ^ P(x)) Intuitively, this statement is not true because the x in both of the quantifiers in the first statement are not necessarily the same! So just because there is an element such that M is true and an element such that P is true, doesn't mean that there is one element where both of them is true. So, let's construct a set of elements that makes this true. Let D = {a, b}, and let M, P be defined on D: x P(x) M(x) a T F b F T So, we can verify the statements: • 3x E D, (M(x)) - yes, verified by the element b. • • 3x E D, ((P(x)) - yes, verified by the element a. ³x € D, (M(x)) ^ ³x E D (P(x)) - yes, as both of the previous two statements show. ³x € D, (M(x) ^ P(x)) – false. There is no element where both M and P are true. Therefore, the implication does not hold, as requested. Predicate Logic 1. Consider each of the following three statements. You can assume for each that D is a set and P and M are predicates over D. Show that each of the statements are not true. You should show this by giving an example of a situation where they are not equivalent, through providing a specific (small, non-empty) set D of elements and the values (T/F) of the predicates on each element of D. You do not have to define how P and M work, just what the result of the predicates are on each element of D. Be sure to explain your choices of set and predicate. a. (3x € D, P(x))^(3x € D, (P(x) = M(x))) implies that (3x = D, (P(x)^M(x))) b. vx € D, (M(x) = P(x)) implies that (3x = D‚¬M(x))^(3x = D, (M(x) ^ P(x)) c. (x = D. (M(x))) = (x = D, (P(x))) implies that vx = D, (M(x) = P(x)) C. ED
Elementary Geometry For College Students, 7e
7th Edition
ISBN:9781337614085
Author:Alexander, Daniel C.; Koeberlein, Geralyn M.
Publisher:Alexander, Daniel C.; Koeberlein, Geralyn M.
ChapterP: Preliminary Concepts
SectionP.CT: Test
Problem 16CT: Let P represent any statement. Classify as true or false. a P and P b P or P
Related questions
Question
This is the question with an example solution for it. Show all your work.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ffbf/5ffbf14a06a96aa2f4a6d6356aa487c6e247bcea" alt="To illustrate how you might approach assignment 2, question 1, here is an example.
Statement: Let's show that the following statement does NOT hold.
Єx € D, (M(x)) ^ ³x E D (P(x)) implies that 3x E D (M(x) ^ P(x))
Intuitively, this statement is not true because the x in both of the quantifiers in the first
statement are not necessarily the same! So just because there is an element such that M is
true and an element such that P is true, doesn't mean that there is one element where both
of them is true. So, let's construct a set of elements that makes this true. Let D = {a, b},
and let M, P be defined on D:
x
P(x)
M(x)
a
T
F
b
F
T
So, we can verify the statements:
•
3x E D, (M(x)) - yes, verified by the element b.
•
•
3x E D, ((P(x)) - yes, verified by the element a.
³x € D, (M(x)) ^ ³x E D (P(x)) - yes, as both of the previous two statements
show.
³x € D, (M(x) ^ P(x)) – false. There is no element where both M and P are true.
Therefore, the implication does not hold, as requested."
Transcribed Image Text:To illustrate how you might approach assignment 2, question 1, here is an example.
Statement: Let's show that the following statement does NOT hold.
Єx € D, (M(x)) ^ ³x E D (P(x)) implies that 3x E D (M(x) ^ P(x))
Intuitively, this statement is not true because the x in both of the quantifiers in the first
statement are not necessarily the same! So just because there is an element such that M is
true and an element such that P is true, doesn't mean that there is one element where both
of them is true. So, let's construct a set of elements that makes this true. Let D = {a, b},
and let M, P be defined on D:
x
P(x)
M(x)
a
T
F
b
F
T
So, we can verify the statements:
•
3x E D, (M(x)) - yes, verified by the element b.
•
•
3x E D, ((P(x)) - yes, verified by the element a.
³x € D, (M(x)) ^ ³x E D (P(x)) - yes, as both of the previous two statements
show.
³x € D, (M(x) ^ P(x)) – false. There is no element where both M and P are true.
Therefore, the implication does not hold, as requested.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d01d9/d01d9ccb2569d72eb350816e5de198c28253d668" alt="Predicate Logic
1.
Consider each of the following three statements. You can assume for each that D is a
set and P and M are predicates over D.
Show that each of the statements are not true. You should show this by giving an example of a
situation where they are not equivalent, through providing a specific (small, non-empty) set D of
elements and the values (T/F) of the predicates on each element of D. You do not have to define
how P and M work, just what the result of the predicates are on each element of D. Be sure to
explain your choices of set and predicate.
a. (3x € D, P(x))^(3x € D, (P(x) = M(x))) implies that (3x = D, (P(x)^M(x)))
b. vx € D, (M(x) = P(x)) implies that (3x = D‚¬M(x))^(3x = D, (M(x) ^ P(x))
c. (x = D. (M(x))) = (x = D, (P(x))) implies that vx = D, (M(x) = P(x))
C.
ED"
Transcribed Image Text:Predicate Logic
1.
Consider each of the following three statements. You can assume for each that D is a
set and P and M are predicates over D.
Show that each of the statements are not true. You should show this by giving an example of a
situation where they are not equivalent, through providing a specific (small, non-empty) set D of
elements and the values (T/F) of the predicates on each element of D. You do not have to define
how P and M work, just what the result of the predicates are on each element of D. Be sure to
explain your choices of set and predicate.
a. (3x € D, P(x))^(3x € D, (P(x) = M(x))) implies that (3x = D, (P(x)^M(x)))
b. vx € D, (M(x) = P(x)) implies that (3x = D‚¬M(x))^(3x = D, (M(x) ^ P(x))
c. (x = D. (M(x))) = (x = D, (P(x))) implies that vx = D, (M(x) = P(x))
C.
ED
Expert Solution
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00039/00039eaf710a9765f6db01fc5b9812260bf5cade" alt=""
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 18 images
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0cbe/e0cbe7c1cfa79a285a06530332b315bcf077d9a4" alt="Blurred answer"
Recommended textbooks for you
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a29e/8a29e7fadd68a8f9280d238fe4d773bcb22d8b15" alt="Elementary Geometry For College Students, 7e"
Elementary Geometry For College Students, 7e
Geometry
ISBN:
9781337614085
Author:
Alexander, Daniel C.; Koeberlein, Geralyn M.
Publisher:
Cengage,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11926/11926f75b115d7de10c4aed71691ec3ae80f0c23" alt="Elements Of Modern Algebra"
Elements Of Modern Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285463230
Author:
Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43e15/43e15002582914b55ed6b493f6175fa4ceff801d" alt="Algebra: Structure And Method, Book 1"
Algebra: Structure And Method, Book 1
Algebra
ISBN:
9780395977224
Author:
Richard G. Brown, Mary P. Dolciani, Robert H. Sorgenfrey, William L. Cole
Publisher:
McDougal Littell
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a29e/8a29e7fadd68a8f9280d238fe4d773bcb22d8b15" alt="Elementary Geometry For College Students, 7e"
Elementary Geometry For College Students, 7e
Geometry
ISBN:
9781337614085
Author:
Alexander, Daniel C.; Koeberlein, Geralyn M.
Publisher:
Cengage,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11926/11926f75b115d7de10c4aed71691ec3ae80f0c23" alt="Elements Of Modern Algebra"
Elements Of Modern Algebra
Algebra
ISBN:
9781285463230
Author:
Gilbert, Linda, Jimmie
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43e15/43e15002582914b55ed6b493f6175fa4ceff801d" alt="Algebra: Structure And Method, Book 1"
Algebra: Structure And Method, Book 1
Algebra
ISBN:
9780395977224
Author:
Richard G. Brown, Mary P. Dolciani, Robert H. Sorgenfrey, William L. Cole
Publisher:
McDougal Littell