Plantwide Overhead Rate versus Departmental Rates, Effects on Pricing Decisions Cherise Ortega, marketing manager for Romer Company, was puzzled by the outcome of two recent bids. The company's policy was to bid 150 percent of the full manufacturing cost. One job (labeled Job 97-28) had been turned down by a prospective customer, who had indicated that the proposed price was $3 per unit higher than the winning bid. A second job (Job 97-35) had been accepted by a customer, who was amazed that Romer could offer such favorable terms. This customer revealed that Romer's price was $43 per unit lower than the next lowest bid. Cherise has been informed that the company was more than competitive in terms of cost control. Accordingly, she began to suspect that the problem was related to cost assignment procedures. Upon investigating, Cherise was told that the company uses a plantwide overhead rate based on direct labor hours. The rate is computed at the beginning of the year using budgeted data. Selected budgeted data are given below. Total Department A $500,000 Overhead Department B $2,000,000 50,000 $2,500,000 Direct labor hours 200,000 250,000 120,000 Machine hours 20,000 100,000 Cherise also discovered that the overhead costs in Department B were higher than those in Department A because B has more equipment, higher maintenance, higher power consumption, higher depreciation, and higher setup costs. In addition to the general procedures for assigning overhead costs, Cherise was supplied with the following specific manufacturing data on Jobs 97-28 and 97-35: Job 97-28 Department B Direct labor hours Machine hours Prime costs Units produced Direct labor hours Machine hours Job 97-28 Job 97-35 Department A Job 97-28 Job 97-35 5,000 200 $100,000 14,400 Department A 51.00 500 200 $10,000 1,500 X X 1,000 400 $20,000 14,400 Job 97-35 Department B 600 3,000 $30,000 1,500 Prime costs Units produced Required: 1. Using a plantwide overhead rate based on direct labor hours, develop the bid prices for Jobs 97-28 and 97-35 (express the bid prices on a per-unit basis). If required, round your answers to the nearest cent. Unit bid price 18.75 ✓ Total 6,000 600 918 X $120,000 14,400 2. Using departmental overhead rates (use direct labor hours for Department A and machine hours for Department B), develop per-unit bid prices for Jobs 97-28 and 97-35. If required, round intermediate computations and final answers to the nearest cent. Unit bid price Total 1,100 3,200 $40,000 1,500 3. Compute the difference in gross profit that would have been earned had the company used departmental rates in its bids instead of the plantwide rate. Round your intermediate computations to two decimal places and final answer to the nearest dollar. Gross profit would have increased by ✔
Plantwide Overhead Rate versus Departmental Rates, Effects on Pricing Decisions Cherise Ortega, marketing manager for Romer Company, was puzzled by the outcome of two recent bids. The company's policy was to bid 150 percent of the full manufacturing cost. One job (labeled Job 97-28) had been turned down by a prospective customer, who had indicated that the proposed price was $3 per unit higher than the winning bid. A second job (Job 97-35) had been accepted by a customer, who was amazed that Romer could offer such favorable terms. This customer revealed that Romer's price was $43 per unit lower than the next lowest bid. Cherise has been informed that the company was more than competitive in terms of cost control. Accordingly, she began to suspect that the problem was related to cost assignment procedures. Upon investigating, Cherise was told that the company uses a plantwide overhead rate based on direct labor hours. The rate is computed at the beginning of the year using budgeted data. Selected budgeted data are given below. Total Department A $500,000 Overhead Department B $2,000,000 50,000 $2,500,000 Direct labor hours 200,000 250,000 120,000 Machine hours 20,000 100,000 Cherise also discovered that the overhead costs in Department B were higher than those in Department A because B has more equipment, higher maintenance, higher power consumption, higher depreciation, and higher setup costs. In addition to the general procedures for assigning overhead costs, Cherise was supplied with the following specific manufacturing data on Jobs 97-28 and 97-35: Job 97-28 Department B Direct labor hours Machine hours Prime costs Units produced Direct labor hours Machine hours Job 97-28 Job 97-35 Department A Job 97-28 Job 97-35 5,000 200 $100,000 14,400 Department A 51.00 500 200 $10,000 1,500 X X 1,000 400 $20,000 14,400 Job 97-35 Department B 600 3,000 $30,000 1,500 Prime costs Units produced Required: 1. Using a plantwide overhead rate based on direct labor hours, develop the bid prices for Jobs 97-28 and 97-35 (express the bid prices on a per-unit basis). If required, round your answers to the nearest cent. Unit bid price 18.75 ✓ Total 6,000 600 918 X $120,000 14,400 2. Using departmental overhead rates (use direct labor hours for Department A and machine hours for Department B), develop per-unit bid prices for Jobs 97-28 and 97-35. If required, round intermediate computations and final answers to the nearest cent. Unit bid price Total 1,100 3,200 $40,000 1,500 3. Compute the difference in gross profit that would have been earned had the company used departmental rates in its bids instead of the plantwide rate. Round your intermediate computations to two decimal places and final answer to the nearest dollar. Gross profit would have increased by ✔
Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1Q
Related questions
Question
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 5 steps with 2 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, accounting and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337272094
Author:
WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337619202
Author:
Hall, James A.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337272094
Author:
WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Accounting Information Systems
Accounting
ISBN:
9781337619202
Author:
Hall, James A.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis…
Accounting
ISBN:
9780134475585
Author:
Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. Rajan
Publisher:
PEARSON
Intermediate Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259722660
Author:
J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M Thomas
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Financial and Managerial Accounting
Accounting
ISBN:
9781259726705
Author:
John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting Principles
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education