Picture.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
Please Answer the Activity on the Picture.
Candidates
Judge 1
Judge 2
98
94
97
97
3.
95
98
4
90
95
89
92
6.
88
90
85
89
8
85
85
Solution:
Candidates
Judge 1
Judge 2
R1
R2
d.
d?
1
98
94
1
4
-3
9.
97
97
0.
3
95
98
3
1
4
4
90
95
4
3
1
1
89
92
6.
88
90
7
85
89
7
7
0.5
0.25
8.
-85
85
8
8
-0.5
0.25
Ed? =14.5
6(14.5)
8(82 – 1)
6Σd
= 1 –
= 0.83
p= 1 –
n(n² – 1)
Interpretation: The computed g = 0.83 indicates a "very high" positive correlation
between the ranks. This means that those candidates who received high ranks from
the first judge are also the candidates who received the same high ranks from the
second judge. Similarly, those candidates who were ranked low by the first judge were
also ranked low by the other judge. This means that the rankings of the two judges
have a "very high" degree of agreement. It also implies that as to the selection of Mr.
Campus Personality, the two judges have more or less the same "taste."
LO
Transcribed Image Text:Candidates Judge 1 Judge 2 98 94 97 97 3. 95 98 4 90 95 89 92 6. 88 90 85 89 8 85 85 Solution: Candidates Judge 1 Judge 2 R1 R2 d. d? 1 98 94 1 4 -3 9. 97 97 0. 3 95 98 3 1 4 4 90 95 4 3 1 1 89 92 6. 88 90 7 85 89 7 7 0.5 0.25 8. -85 85 8 8 -0.5 0.25 Ed? =14.5 6(14.5) 8(82 – 1) 6Σd = 1 – = 0.83 p= 1 – n(n² – 1) Interpretation: The computed g = 0.83 indicates a "very high" positive correlation between the ranks. This means that those candidates who received high ranks from the first judge are also the candidates who received the same high ranks from the second judge. Similarly, those candidates who were ranked low by the first judge were also ranked low by the other judge. This means that the rankings of the two judges have a "very high" degree of agreement. It also implies that as to the selection of Mr. Campus Personality, the two judges have more or less the same "taste." LO
E xtension
The Statistics of Ranks
Spearman Rho
Beauty contests are very popular not only among Filipinos but also to many
people around the world. Normally, when the names of the five finalists are announced,
people place their own bets on who will be the queen and the runners-up. Very often,
they are happy about the results. This happens when their ranks agree with the ranks
assigned by the board of judges. There might be some slight differences between the
ranks assigned by the people and those by the board of judges but if overall, there is a
positive correlation (or agreement) between these ranks, then everyone will be happy
about the results.
In this next statistical measure, we shall be concerned with correlation between
ranks. Like in simple correlation, we have cases of positive correlation, zero correlation,
or negative correlation. A positive rank correlation indicates that those categories that
are given high ranks by one judge (or rater) are also the categories that are assigned
high ranks by the other rater. Or those with low ranks in one have also low ranks in
the other. A negative rank correlation is the reverse. It means that those categories who
were assigned high ranks by the first rater were given low ranks by the second rater,
or vice versa.
The most common method used in rank correlation is the statistics developed by
Spearman, where the coefficient used is symbolized by ọ (rho, Greek letter for r). To
compute r, we use the formula
6Ed?
p = 1 -.
n(n² – 1)
where d = difference between ranks
n = number of categories given ranks
In interpreting the computed value, we use the same qualitative interpretation as
the one we use in interpreting r.
Let us take this example:
In a contest for Mr. Campus Personality, two judges gave their ratings to eight
candidates. Transform the ratings to ranks and compute the coefficient of rank
correlation. Interpret results.
Transcribed Image Text:E xtension The Statistics of Ranks Spearman Rho Beauty contests are very popular not only among Filipinos but also to many people around the world. Normally, when the names of the five finalists are announced, people place their own bets on who will be the queen and the runners-up. Very often, they are happy about the results. This happens when their ranks agree with the ranks assigned by the board of judges. There might be some slight differences between the ranks assigned by the people and those by the board of judges but if overall, there is a positive correlation (or agreement) between these ranks, then everyone will be happy about the results. In this next statistical measure, we shall be concerned with correlation between ranks. Like in simple correlation, we have cases of positive correlation, zero correlation, or negative correlation. A positive rank correlation indicates that those categories that are given high ranks by one judge (or rater) are also the categories that are assigned high ranks by the other rater. Or those with low ranks in one have also low ranks in the other. A negative rank correlation is the reverse. It means that those categories who were assigned high ranks by the first rater were given low ranks by the second rater, or vice versa. The most common method used in rank correlation is the statistics developed by Spearman, where the coefficient used is symbolized by ọ (rho, Greek letter for r). To compute r, we use the formula 6Ed? p = 1 -. n(n² – 1) where d = difference between ranks n = number of categories given ranks In interpreting the computed value, we use the same qualitative interpretation as the one we use in interpreting r. Let us take this example: In a contest for Mr. Campus Personality, two judges gave their ratings to eight candidates. Transform the ratings to ranks and compute the coefficient of rank correlation. Interpret results.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 1 images

Blurred answer
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman