Our environment is influenced by stages of economic development. It has been demonstrated empirically that in the early phase ofdevelopment, environmental pollution-Select one:a. fallsb. increases and then fallsc risesd. remains constante. decreases at an increasing rateWhich of the following is true when emission charges are compared to emission standards?Select one:a. Polluters automatically reduce their emissions when abatement costs decline under a policy of emissions charges, but do not reducetheir emissions automatically when standards are in place and abatement costs decline.b. Polluters pay both emission charges and abatement cost charges under a policy of emissions charges, but only pay for abatementcosts when emission standards are in place.c all of the aboved. Polluters will realize bigger pollution control cost reductions from R&D efforts under a policy of emission charges than under a policyof emission standards.

“Since you have asked multiple questions, we will solve the first question for you. If you want any…

Our environment is influenced by stages of economic development. It has been demonstrated empirically that in the early phase of development, envitonmental pollution- Select one: a falls b. increases and then falls c rises d. remains constant e. decreases at an increasing rate

Our environment is influenced by stages of economic development. It has been demonstrated empirically that in the early phase of development, envitonmental pollution- Select one: a falls b. increases and then falls c rises d. remains constant e. decreases at an increasing rate

Essentials of Economics (MindTap Course List)

8th Edition

ISBN:9781337091992

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter10: Externalities

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4PA

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Do market demand curves reflect positive externalities? Why or why not?
In the Land of Purity, there is only one form of pollution, called gunk. Table 12.14 shows possible combinations of economic output and reduction of gunk, depending on what kinds of environmental regulations you choose. Sketch a graph of a production possibility frontier with environmental quality on the horizontal axis, measured by the percentage reduction of gunk, and with the quantity of economic output on the vertical axis. Which choices display productive efficiency? How can you tell? Which choices show allocative efficiency? How can you tell? In the choice between K and L, can you say which one is better and why? In the choice between K. and N, can you say which one is better, and why? If you had to guess, which choice would you think is move likely to represent a command-and-control environmental policy and which choice is more likely to represent a market-oriented environmental policy, choice L or M? Why?
A country called Sherwood is very heavily covered with a forest of 50,000 trees. There are proposals to clear some of Sherwoods forest and grow com, but obtaining this additional economic output will have an environmental cost from reducing the number of trees. Table 12.11 shows possible combinations of economic output and environmental protection. Sketch a graph of a production possibility frontier with environmental quality on the horizontal axis, measured by the number of trees, and the quantity of economic output, measured in corn, on the vertical axis. Which choices display productive efficiency? How can you tell? Which choices show allocative efficiency? How can you tell? In the choice between T and R, decide which one is better. Why? In the choice between T and S, can you say which one is better, and why? If you had to guess, which choice would you think is more likely to represent a command-and-control environmental policy and which choice is more likely to represent a market-oriented environmental policy, choice Q or S? Why?
Is zero pollution an optimal goal? Way or why not?
Economists sometimes shock noneconomists by stating that they do not favor the complete elimination of pollution. Explain the rationale for this position.
Show the market for cigarettes in equilibrium, assuming that there are no laws banning smoking in public. Label the equilibrium private market price and quantity as Pm and Qm. Add whatever is needed to the model to show the impact of the negative externality from second-hand smoking. (Hint: In this case it is the consumers, not the sellers, who are creating the negative externality.) Label the social optimal output and price as Fe and Qe. On the graph, shade in the deadweight loss at the market output.
How can high-income countries benefit from covering much of the cost of reducing pollution created by low-income countries?
From an economic perspective, is it sound policy to pursue a goal of zero pollution? Why or why not?
Assume that the market for tradable emissions permits by power plants has been operating efficiently for severalyears. An engineering firmthen invents a lower cost device for pollution abatement. What happens to theequilibrium market price of a tradable permit, and why? Draw a supply and demand diagram, with a fixedsupply of pollution permits, along with your answer.Has the socially optimal amount of pollution increasedor decreased? Explain
a) If the total benefits to society of achieving some specific level of pollution control aresignificantly greater than the total costs to society of doing so, will it necessarily beeconomically efficient (socially optimal) to do so? Explain your answer with words and agraph.b) In March 2011, the US EPA issued a report that looked at the results of the Clean Air Actfrom 1990 to 2020 (see: http://www.epa.gov/air/sect812/prospective2.html). This reviewfound that in the central estimate of the CAA’s impact, benefits exceeded costs by a ratio of30 to 1. This leads some environmental policy commentators to conclude that the EPA hadnot gone far enough in reducing air pollution. Under what conditions would a benefit costratio of 30:1 imply that it would be economically efficient to further reduce air pollutionunder the CAA? Assuming the EPA’s benefit-cost estimate is correct, is it possible that itcould actually be economically efficient to loosen, rather than strengthen, air…
Submit All Which statement is TRUE with regards to the use of tradable permits for controlling carbon emissions? The total amount of pollution would rise above the established cap if permit prices were set too high. Environmental groups that purchase tradable permits and do not use them will push the price of remaining permits lower. O Firms with lower costs of pollution abatement will demand more tradable permits. O Advancements in abatement technology will lead to a decline in the price of tradable permits. Activate Windows Go to Settings to activate Windos Q市市市公e電后利口 11/ HDM LAPTOP LOGIN HIGH DEFINITION MULTIMEDIA INT acer USERNAME: student RASSIA OD
How do taxes, pollution charges, and cap-and-trade work to reduce emissions? Taxes and pollution charges _______.