Our aim is to check whether 179 is a prime number or a composite number. Which among the following options is true? We need to check if 179 has a divisor from the set (2,3,5,7,11, 13) and if all of them are divisors of 179, we can deduce that 179 is composite. Otherwise, it is prime. 179 is prime since it has no divisors from the set {2,3,5,7,11,13). We need to check if 179 has a divisor from the set {2,3,5,7,11,13) and if one of them is not a divisor of 179, we can deduce that 179 is prime. None of the mentioned O 179 is prime since it has no divisors from the set (2,3,5,7,11}.
Our aim is to check whether 179 is a prime number or a composite number. Which among the following options is true? We need to check if 179 has a divisor from the set (2,3,5,7,11, 13) and if all of them are divisors of 179, we can deduce that 179 is composite. Otherwise, it is prime. 179 is prime since it has no divisors from the set {2,3,5,7,11,13). We need to check if 179 has a divisor from the set {2,3,5,7,11,13) and if one of them is not a divisor of 179, we can deduce that 179 is prime. None of the mentioned O 179 is prime since it has no divisors from the set (2,3,5,7,11}.
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
Related questions
Question
i need the answer quickly
Transcribed Image Text:Our aim is to check whether 179 is a prime number or a composite number. Which among the
following options is true?
We need to check if 179 has a divisor from the set (2,3,5,7,11, 13)} and if all of them
are divisors of 179, we can deduce that 179 is composite. Otherwise, it is prime.
179 is prime since it has no divisors from the set (2,3,5,7,11,13}.
We need to check if 179 has a divisor from the set {2,3,5,7,11,13) and if one of them is
not a divisor of 179, we can deduce that 179 is prime.
None of the mentioned
179 is prime since it has no divisors from the set (2,3,5,7,11}.
Let a, n be positive integers. Knowing that 15a - 13n = 1, we deduce that the multiplicative inverse
of a (mod n)
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 2 images
Recommended textbooks for you
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
