What is correct? A group of 80 people who had been diagnosed as prediabetic because of high blood glucose levels volunteeredto participate in a study designed to investigate the use of cinnamon to reduce blood glucose to a normal level.Of the 80 people, 40 were randomly assigned to take a cinnamon tablet each day and the other 40 were assignedto take a placebo each day. The people did not know which tablet they were taking. Their blood glucose levelswere measured at the end of one month. The results showed that 14 people in the cinnamon group and 10 peoplein the placebo group had normal blood glucose levels. For people similar to those in the study, do the dataprovide convincing statistical evidence that the proportion who would be classified as normal after one month oftaking cinnamon is greater than the proportion who would be classified as normal after one month of not takingcinnamon?(A) No conclusion can be made about the use of cinnamon because the people in the study were volunteers.(B) There is convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.01.(C) There is convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.05 but not at the level of 0.01.(D) There is convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.10 but not at the level of 0.05.(E) There is not convincing statistical evidence at any reasonable significance level.

Cinnamon(1) Placebo(2) x1 = 14 x2 = 10 n1 = 40 n2 = 40 p^1 = x1n1=1440=0.35 p^2= x2n2=1040=…

oup of 80 people who had been diagnosed as prediabetic because of high blood glucose levels rticipate in a study designed to investigate the use of cinnamon to reduce blood glucose to a n e 80 people, 40 were randomly assigned to take a cinnamon tablet each day and the other 40 ke a placebo each day. The people did not know which tablet they were taking. Their blood gl measured at the end of one month. The results showed that 14 people in the cinnamon group e placebo group had normal blood glucose levels. For people similar to those in the study, do i ide convincing statistical evidence that the proportion who would be classified as normal after g cinnamon is greater than the proportion who would be classified as normal after one month amon? No conclusion can be made about the use of cinnamon because the people in the study were v- са There is convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.01. There is convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.05 but not at the level of 0.01. There is convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.10 but not at the level of 0.05. There is not convincing statistical evidence at anyy reasonable significance level

oup of 80 people who had been diagnosed as prediabetic because of high blood glucose levels rticipate in a study designed to investigate the use of cinnamon to reduce blood glucose to a n e 80 people, 40 were randomly assigned to take a cinnamon tablet each day and the other 40 ke a placebo each day. The people did not know which tablet they were taking. Their blood gl measured at the end of one month. The results showed that 14 people in the cinnamon group e placebo group had normal blood glucose levels. For people similar to those in the study, do i ide convincing statistical evidence that the proportion who would be classified as normal after g cinnamon is greater than the proportion who would be classified as normal after one month amon? No conclusion can be made about the use of cinnamon because the people in the study were v- са There is convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.01. There is convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.05 but not at the level of 0.01. There is convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.10 but not at the level of 0.05. There is not convincing statistical evidence at anyy reasonable significance level

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Dery?
Does this
E) what other questions might this raise about the results ?
could this be done by a human?
Sophomore, junior, and senior students at a high school will be surveyed regarding a potential increase in the extracurricular student activities fee. There are three possible responses to the survey question - agree with the increase, do not agree with the increase, or no opinion. A chi-square test will be conducted to determine whether the response to this question is independent of the class in which the student is a member. How many degrees of freedom should the chi-square test have?
C(11,8)=
what is the final answer to this question
So what is the answer here!