oup of 80 people who had been diagnosed as prediabetic because of high blood glucose levels rticipate in a study designed to investigate the use of cinnamon to reduce blood glucose to a n e 80 people, 40 were randomly assigned to take a cinnamon tablet each day and the other 40 ke a placebo each day. The people did not know which tablet they were taking. Their blood gl measured at the end of one month. The results showed that 14 people in the cinnamon group e placebo group had normal blood glucose levels. For people similar to those in the study, do i ide convincing statistical evidence that the proportion who would be classified as normal after g cinnamon is greater than the proportion who would be classified as normal after one month amon? No conclusion can be made about the use of cinnamon because the people in the study were v- са There is convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.01. There is convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.05 but not at the level of 0.01. There is convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.10 but not at the level of 0.05. There is not convincing statistical evidence at anyy reasonable significance level
oup of 80 people who had been diagnosed as prediabetic because of high blood glucose levels rticipate in a study designed to investigate the use of cinnamon to reduce blood glucose to a n e 80 people, 40 were randomly assigned to take a cinnamon tablet each day and the other 40 ke a placebo each day. The people did not know which tablet they were taking. Their blood gl measured at the end of one month. The results showed that 14 people in the cinnamon group e placebo group had normal blood glucose levels. For people similar to those in the study, do i ide convincing statistical evidence that the proportion who would be classified as normal after g cinnamon is greater than the proportion who would be classified as normal after one month amon? No conclusion can be made about the use of cinnamon because the people in the study were v- са There is convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.01. There is convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.05 but not at the level of 0.01. There is convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.10 but not at the level of 0.05. There is not convincing statistical evidence at anyy reasonable significance level
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question
What is correct?
Transcribed Image Text:A group of 80 people who had been diagnosed as prediabetic because of high blood glucose levels volunteered
to participate in a study designed to investigate the use of cinnamon to reduce blood glucose to a normal level.
Of the 80 people, 40 were randomly assigned to take a cinnamon tablet each day and the other 40 were assigned
to take a placebo each day. The people did not know which tablet they were taking. Their blood glucose levels
were measured at the end of one month. The results showed that 14 people in the cinnamon group and 10 people
in the placebo group had normal blood glucose levels. For people similar to those in the study, do the data
provide convincing statistical evidence that the proportion who would be classified as normal after one month of
taking cinnamon is greater than the proportion who would be classified as normal after one month of not taking
cinnamon?
(A) No conclusion can be made about the use of cinnamon because the people in the study were volunteers.
(B) There is convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.01.
(C) There is convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.05 but not at the level of 0.01.
(D) There is convincing statistical evidence at the level of 0.10 but not at the level of 0.05.
(E) There is not convincing statistical evidence at any reasonable significance level.
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 1 images
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman