One row in the PAT_ENC table represents one patient encounter. One row in the ORDER_MED table represents one medication order. One patient encounter can have many medication orders but one medication order can only have one patient encounter. In other words, the cardinality of this PAT_ENC to ORDER_MED relationship is one-to- many. You start a query with ORDER_MED. You then add PAT_ENC using an inner join. What is true about the granularity of the result set before and after adding the PAT_ENC table? A. The granularity stays at one row per patient encounter B. The granularity stays at one row per medication order C. The granularity changes from one row per medication order to one row per patient encounter D. The granularity changes from one row per patient encounter to one row per medication order on an encounter

Database System Concepts
7th Edition
ISBN:9780078022159
Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan
Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan
Chapter1: Introduction
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1PE
icon
Related questions
Question
**Understanding Table Relationships and Query Granularity**

In a database, different tables often represent distinct entities and their relationships. Here’s an exploration of such a relationship and how it impacts the granularity of query results:

- **PAT_ENC Table**: Each row represents a single patient encounter.
- **ORDER_MED Table**: Each row represents a single medication order.

### Relationship
- Each patient encounter can have multiple medication orders. However, each medication order pertains to only one patient encounter.
- This relationship is characterized as **one-to-many** from PAT_ENC to ORDER_MED.

### Query Scenario
- A query is initiated with the `ORDER_MED` table.
- When you add the `PAT_ENC` table using an inner join, the granularity of the result set needs to be examined.

### Granularity Options
When considering the impact on granularity:

- **A**: The granularity remains at one row per patient encounter.
- **B**: The granularity remains at one row per medication order.
- **C**: The granularity shifts from one row per medication order to one row per patient encounter.
- **D**: The granularity shifts from one row per patient encounter to one row per medication order on an encounter.

**Correct Answer**: **B** - The granularity stays at one row per medication order.

This implies that joining the `PAT_ENC` table does not change the granularity from the perspective of the `ORDER_MED` table. Each row in the result set will still represent a medication order.
Transcribed Image Text:**Understanding Table Relationships and Query Granularity** In a database, different tables often represent distinct entities and their relationships. Here’s an exploration of such a relationship and how it impacts the granularity of query results: - **PAT_ENC Table**: Each row represents a single patient encounter. - **ORDER_MED Table**: Each row represents a single medication order. ### Relationship - Each patient encounter can have multiple medication orders. However, each medication order pertains to only one patient encounter. - This relationship is characterized as **one-to-many** from PAT_ENC to ORDER_MED. ### Query Scenario - A query is initiated with the `ORDER_MED` table. - When you add the `PAT_ENC` table using an inner join, the granularity of the result set needs to be examined. ### Granularity Options When considering the impact on granularity: - **A**: The granularity remains at one row per patient encounter. - **B**: The granularity remains at one row per medication order. - **C**: The granularity shifts from one row per medication order to one row per patient encounter. - **D**: The granularity shifts from one row per patient encounter to one row per medication order on an encounter. **Correct Answer**: **B** - The granularity stays at one row per medication order. This implies that joining the `PAT_ENC` table does not change the granularity from the perspective of the `ORDER_MED` table. Each row in the result set will still represent a medication order.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Intermediate SQL concepts
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, computer-science and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Database System Concepts
Database System Concepts
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780078022159
Author:
Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Starting Out with Python (4th Edition)
Starting Out with Python (4th Edition)
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780134444321
Author:
Tony Gaddis
Publisher:
PEARSON
Digital Fundamentals (11th Edition)
Digital Fundamentals (11th Edition)
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780132737968
Author:
Thomas L. Floyd
Publisher:
PEARSON
C How to Program (8th Edition)
C How to Program (8th Edition)
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780133976892
Author:
Paul J. Deitel, Harvey Deitel
Publisher:
PEARSON
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag…
Database Systems: Design, Implementation, & Manag…
Computer Science
ISBN:
9781337627900
Author:
Carlos Coronel, Steven Morris
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Programmable Logic Controllers
Programmable Logic Controllers
Computer Science
ISBN:
9780073373843
Author:
Frank D. Petruzella
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education