On March 5, 2010, Yamada Dairy Co. decided to replace its outdated pasteurization system with a more efficient one. The old system had a book value of $10,500 and a fair value of $1,500. Yamada's new pasteurization system has a fair value of $210,000, for which Yamada paid $208,500 after allowing the contractor to keep the old equipment. How much should Yamada capitalize on the cost of the new pasteurization system? Provide answer

On March 5, 2010, Yamada Dairy Co. decided to replace its outdated pasteurization system with a more efficient one. The old system had a book value of $10,500 and a fair value of $1,500. Yamada's new pasteurization system has a fair value of $210,000, for which Yamada paid $208,500 after allowing the contractor to keep the old equipment. How much should Yamada capitalize on the cost of the new pasteurization system? Provide answer

Intermediate Accounting: Reporting And Analysis

3rd Edition

ISBN:9781337788281

Author:James M. Wahlen, Jefferson P. Jones, Donald Pagach

Publisher:James M. Wahlen, Jefferson P. Jones, Donald Pagach

Chapter10: Property, Plant And Equipment: Acquisition And Subsequent Investments

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 10MC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

On March 5, 2010, Yamada Dairy Co. decided to replace its outdated pasteurization system with a more efficient one. The old system had a book value of $10,500 and a fair value of $1,500. Yamada's new pasteurization system has a fair value of $210,000, for which Yamada paid $208,500 after allowing the contractor to keep the old equipment. How much should Yamada capitalize on the cost of the new pasteurization system?
Wildhorse Inc. recently replaced a piece of automatic equipment at a net price of $5,360, f.o.b. factory. The replacement was necessary because one of Wildhorse’s employees had accidentally backed his truck into Wildhorse’s original equipment and made it inoperable. Because of the accident, the equipment had no resale value to anyone and had to be scrapped. Wildhorse’s insurance policy provided for a replacement of its equipment and paid the price of the new equipment directly to the new equipment manufacturer, minus the deductible amount paid to the manufacturer by Wildhorse. The $5,360 that Wildhorse paid was the amount of the deductible that it has to pay on any single claim on its insurance policy. The new equipment represents the same value in use to Wildhorse. The used equipment had originally cost $64,800. It had a book value of $48,000 at the time of the accident and a second-hand market value of $55,020 before the accident, based on recent transactions involving similar…
Blossom Inc. recently replaced a piece of automatic equipment at a net price of $3,500, f.o.b. factory. The replacement was necessary because one of Blossom’s employees had accidentally backed his truck into Blossom’s original equipment and made it inoperable. Because of the accident, the equipment had no resale value to anyone and had to be scrapped. Blossom’s insurance policy provided for a replacement of its equipment and paid the price of the new equipment directly to the new equipment manufacturer, minus the deductible amount paid to the manufacturer by Blossom. The $3,500 that Blossom paid was the amount of the deductible that it has to pay on any single claim on its insurance policy. The new equipment represents the same value in use to Blossom. The used equipment had originally cost $64,000. It had a book value of $45,000 at the time of the accident and a second-hand market value of $50,000 before the accident, based on recent transactions involving similar equipment. Freight…
Blossom Inc. recently replaced a piece of automatic equipment at a net price of $3,500, f.o.b. factory. The replacement was necessary because one of Blossom’s employees had accidentally backed his truck into Blossom’s original equipment and made it inoperable. Because of the accident, the equipment had no resale value to anyone and had to be scrapped. Blossom’s insurance policy provided for a replacement of its equipment and paid the price of the new equipment directly to the new equipment manufacturer, minus the deductible amount paid to the manufacturer by Blossom. The $3,500 that Blossom paid was the amount of the deductible that it has to pay on any single claim on its insurance policy. The new equipment represents the same value in use to Blossom. The used equipment had originally cost $64,000. It had a book value of $45,000 at the time of the accident and a second-hand market value of $50,000 before the accident, based on recent transactions involving similar equipment. Freight…
Aerospace Manufacturing recently replaced a piece of machinery at a net price of $4,000, f.o.b. destination. The replacement was necessary because the machine burned out making it inoperable. Therefore, the machine had no resale value and had to be scrapped. Aerospace's insurance policy provided for a replacement of the machine and paid the cost of the new machine directly to the manufacturer, less the deductible amount Aerospace paid to the manufacturer. The $4,000 that Aerospace paid was the amount of the deductible that it has to pay on any single claim on its insurance policy. The new machine represents the same value in use to Aerospace. The old machine originally cost $70,000. It's book value was $40,000 at the time of the burn out and had a market value of $50,800 before the burn out, based on recent transactions involving similar machinery. Freight and installation charges for the new machine cost Aerospace an additional $1,100 cash. Required a) Prepare the general journal…
Webster & Moore paid $148,000, in cash, for equipment three years ago. At the beginning of last year, the company spent $21,000 to update the equipment with the latest technology. The company no longer uses this equipment in its current operations and has received an offer of $96,000 from a firm that would like to purchase it. The firm is debating whether to sell the equipment or to expand its operations so that the equipment can be used. The equipment, including the updates, has a book value of $44,500. When evaluating the expansion option, what value, if any, should the firm assign to this equipment as an initial cost of the project? a) $0 b) $44,500 c) $96,000 d) $124,500 e) $160,000
Pharoah Inc. recently replaced a piece of automatic equipment at a net price of $4,030, f.o.b. factory. The replacement was necessary because one of Pharoah’s employees had accidentally backed his truck into Pharoah’s original equipment and made it inoperable. Because of the accident, the equipment had no resale value to anyone and had to be scrapped. Pharoah’s insurance policy provided for a replacement of its equipment and paid the price of the new equipment directly to the new equipment manufacturer, minus the deductible amount paid to the manufacturer by Pharoah. The $4,030 that Pharoah paid was the amount of the deductible that it has to pay on any single claim on its insurance policy. The new equipment represents the same value in use to Pharoah. The used equipment had originally cost $65,800. It had a book value of $46,600 at the time of the accident and a second-hand market value of $52,730 before the accident, based on recent transactions involving similar equipment. Freight…
Pharoah Inc. recently replaced a piece of automatic equipment at a net price of $4,030, f.o.b. factory. The replacement was necessary because one of Pharoah’s employees had accidentally backed his truck into Pharoah’s original equipment and made it inoperable. Because of the accident, the equipment had no resale value to anyone and had to be scrapped. Pharoah’s insurance policy provided for a replacement of its equipment and paid the price of the new equipment directly to the new equipment manufacturer, minus the deductible amount paid to the manufacturer by Pharoah. The $4,030 that Pharoah paid was the amount of the deductible that it has to pay on any single claim on its insurance policy. The new equipment represents the same value in use to Pharoah. The used equipment had originally cost $65,800. It had a book value of $46,600 at the time of the accident and a second-hand market value of $52,730 before the accident, based on recent transactions involving similar equipment. Freight…
Freida Company is considering an asset replacement project of replacing a control device. This old control device has been fully depreciated but can be sold for $5,000. The new control device, which is more automated, will cost $42,000. The new device’s installation and shipping costs will total $16,000. The new device will be depreciated on a straight-line basis over its 2-year economic life to an estimated salvage value of $0. The actual salvage value of this device at the end of 2-year period (That is, the market value of the device at the end of 2-year period) is estimated to be $4,000. If the replacement project is accepted, Freida will require an initial working capital investment of $2,200 (that is, adding $2,200 initially to its net working capital). During the 1st year of operations, Freida expects its annual revenue to increase from $72,800 to $90,000. After the 1st year, revenues from the replacement are expected to increase at a rate of $2,800 a year for the remainder of…
ABC company is considering replacing their old manual loading machine with an automatic loading machine. The manual machine cost $300,000 three years ago, and is being depreciated over 10 years straight line depreciation, with no salvage value. If ABC replaces the manual machine, the new automatic machine will cost $400,000 and have a useful life of 10 years. This will also be depreciated on a straight line basis to zero. As a result of this new machine, there will be pretax savings of $130,000 in labour costs and $25,000 in other cash expenses annually. If the automatic machine is purchased, the old machine will immediately be sold at a price of $280,000. The company has already spent $15,000 researching the costs associated with this decision. The company's tax rate is 40% and no inflation is expected. The company's cost of capital is 7%. Calculate the net present value of this decision using a financial calulator
Chatham Automotive purchased new electric forklifts to move steel automobile parts two years ago. They cost $65,000 each, including the charging stand. In practice, it was found that they did not hold a charge as long as claimed by the manufacturer, so operating costs are very high. As a result, their current salvage value is about $10,000. Chatham is considering replacing them with propane models. New propane forklifts cost $57,000 each. After one year, they have a salvage value of $40,000, and thereafter decline in value at a declining-balance depreciation rate of 20 percent, as does the electric model from this time on. The MARR is 9 percent. Operating costs for the electric model will be $20,000 this year, rising by 11 percent per year. Operating costs for the propane model will initially be $11,000 over the first year, rising by 11 percent per year. Should Chatham Automotive replace the forklifts now? Click the icon to view the table of compound interest factors for discrete…
Badhibe