Ole ed nde ene – te tr cept dding e co ue d ll no ons ton Energy (eV) -5 -10 -15 Bohr n=3- n=21 n=1- Sommerfeld ng= ng=2 ng = 1 ng=2- ng=1 1.81 x 104 eV ng=1 Dirac j=5/2,1=2 j= 3/2,1 = 1,2 j= 1/2,1 = 0,1 j= 3/2,1 = 1 j= 1/2,1 = 0,1 -j= 1/2,1=0
Ole ed nde ene – te tr cept dding e co ue d ll no ons ton Energy (eV) -5 -10 -15 Bohr n=3- n=21 n=1- Sommerfeld ng= ng=2 ng = 1 ng=2- ng=1 1.81 x 104 eV ng=1 Dirac j=5/2,1=2 j= 3/2,1 = 1,2 j= 1/2,1 = 0,1 j= 3/2,1 = 1 j= 1/2,1 = 0,1 -j= 1/2,1=0
Related questions
Question
100%
(a) Draw the hydrogen energy-level diagram for all states through n = 2 as in the righthand part of Figure 8-11, but with the splitting according to l also shown. (b) With arrows
connecting pairs of levels, show all the transitions that are allowed by the selection
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b724/3b7242b94992ad4fd6c1155e74dd44c5cd1450b9" alt="at
n
be
able
Om
ted f
Dende
es en
bit in
ete tr
m can
except
adding
he co
alue of
hall no
tions
at on
Dical
Spectr
10-4
tion
e only
we ha
at the
confusion in the 1920s, when the modern quantum theories were being developed.
The coincidence occurs because the errors made by the Sommerfeld model, in ig-
noring the spin-orbit interaction and in using classical mechanics to evaluate the
average energy shift due to the relativistic dependence of mass on velocity, happen
to cancel for the case of the hydrogen atom.
The energy levels of the hydrogen atom, as predicted by Bohr, Sommerfeld, and
Dirac are shown in Figure 8-11. In order to make visible the energy-level splittings,
Energy (eV)
-10
-15-
Bohr
n = 3
n=2
n = 1.
Sommerfeld
ng= 3
ng = 2
ng = 1
ng=2
ng = 1
1.81 x 104 eV
ng=1.
Dirac
j= 5/2,1 = 2
j= 3/2,1 = 1,2
j= 1/2, 10, 1
j= 3/2,1 = 1
j= 1/2,1 = 0,1
-j=1/2,1=0
Figure 8-11 The energy levels of the hydrogen atom for n = 1, 2, 3 according to Bohr,
Sommerfeld, and Dirac. The displacements of the Sommerfeld and Dirac levels from those
given by Bohr have been exaggerated by a factor of (1/a)2~ (137)² ~ 1.88 x 104."
Transcribed Image Text:at
n
be
able
Om
ted f
Dende
es en
bit in
ete tr
m can
except
adding
he co
alue of
hall no
tions
at on
Dical
Spectr
10-4
tion
e only
we ha
at the
confusion in the 1920s, when the modern quantum theories were being developed.
The coincidence occurs because the errors made by the Sommerfeld model, in ig-
noring the spin-orbit interaction and in using classical mechanics to evaluate the
average energy shift due to the relativistic dependence of mass on velocity, happen
to cancel for the case of the hydrogen atom.
The energy levels of the hydrogen atom, as predicted by Bohr, Sommerfeld, and
Dirac are shown in Figure 8-11. In order to make visible the energy-level splittings,
Energy (eV)
-10
-15-
Bohr
n = 3
n=2
n = 1.
Sommerfeld
ng= 3
ng = 2
ng = 1
ng=2
ng = 1
1.81 x 104 eV
ng=1.
Dirac
j= 5/2,1 = 2
j= 3/2,1 = 1,2
j= 1/2, 10, 1
j= 3/2,1 = 1
j= 1/2,1 = 0,1
-j=1/2,1=0
Figure 8-11 The energy levels of the hydrogen atom for n = 1, 2, 3 according to Bohr,
Sommerfeld, and Dirac. The displacements of the Sommerfeld and Dirac levels from those
given by Bohr have been exaggerated by a factor of (1/a)2~ (137)² ~ 1.88 x 104.
Expert Solution
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00039/00039eaf710a9765f6db01fc5b9812260bf5cade" alt=""
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 1 images
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0cbe/e0cbe7c1cfa79a285a06530332b315bcf077d9a4" alt="Blurred answer"