Null Hypothesis: D(UR) has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Bandwidth: 1 (Newey-West automatic) using Bartlett kernel Adj. t-Stat Phillips-Perron test statistic Test critical values: 1% level 5% level 10% level *MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values. Residual variance (no correction) HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel) Phillips-Perron Test Equation Dependent Variable: D(UR,2) Method: Least Squares Date: 10/30/22 Time: 12:15 Sample (adjusted): 1993 2021 Included observations: 29 after adjustments Variable D(UR(-1)) с R-squared Adjusted R-squared S.E. of regression Sum squared resid Log likelihood Coefficient Std. Error -5.759070 -3.679322 -2.967767 -2.622989 t-Statistic -0.968343 0.169238 -5.721785 -4.865252 4.736333 -1.027219 0.548033 Mean dependent var 0.531293 S.D. dependent var 25.37571 Akaike info criterion 17386.01 Schwarz criterion -133.8930 Hannan-Quinn criter. Prob.* 0.0000 599.5177 559.6867 Prob. 0.0000 0.3134 -2.130192 37.06529 9.371934 9.466230 9.401466

Null Hypothesis: D(UR) has a unit root Exogenous: Constant Bandwidth: 1 (Newey-West automatic) using Bartlett kernel Adj. t-Stat Phillips-Perron test statistic Test critical values: 1% level 5% level 10% level MacKinnon (1996) one-sided p-values. Residual variance (no correction) HAC corrected variance (Bartlett kernel) Phillips-Perron Test Equation Dependent Variable: D(UR,2) Method: Least Squares Date: 10/30/22 Time: 12:15 Sample (adjusted): 1993 2021 Included observations: 29 after adjustments Variable D(UR(-1)) с R-squared Adjusted R-squared S.E. of regression Sum squared resid Log likelihood Coefficient Std. Error -5.759070 -3.679322 -2.967767 -2.622989 t-Statistic -0.968343 0.169238 -5.721785 -4.865252 4.736333 -1.027219 0.548033 Mean dependent var 0.531293 S.D. dependent var 25.37571 Akaike info criterion 17386.01 Schwarz criterion -133.8930 Hannan-Quinn criter. Prob. 0.0000 599.5177 559.6867 Prob. 0.0000 0.3134 -2.130192 37.06529 9.371934 9.466230 9.401466

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications

6th Edition

ISBN:9781119256830

Author:Amos Gilat

Publisher:Amos Gilat

Chapter1: Starting With Matlab

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

What is the t statistic for the top 3% for a sample size of 19.
What is the difference between multivariate data set and bivariate data?
Show the impact of sample size on power?
A clinical trial is conducted to compare a new pain re- liever for arthritis to a placebo. Participants are randomly assigned to receive the new medication or a placebo, and the outcome is pain relief within 30 minutes. The data are shown in Table 7–8. Is there a significant difference in the proportions of patients reporting pain relief? Run the test at a 5% level of significance. Pain Relief No Pain Relief New Medication 44 76 Placebo 21 99 How would I use excel with this?
A company that has a 10% market share (they sell their product to 10% of all potential buyers) launches a marketing campaign. At the end of the campaign period, the company conducts a survey in order to assess whether its market share has increased. The result of the survey issued to 500 customers was 12.5%.h0= p=0.10, h1= p>0.10test statistic= 1.86P value= 0.0314 a. State your conclusion using ΅ = 0.05.b. What would be the potential Type I and Type II errors in this problem? Explain these possible errors in context.
A software company is interested in improving customer satisfaction rate from the 60% currently claimed. The company sponsored a survey of 148 customers and found that 95 customers were satisfied. What is the test statistic z?
A program administrator at a high school wanted to see if there was a significant association between experiencing verbal abuse and anxiety in teenage women. She wasn't sure what to expect. Perform the correct statistical procedure to assess the degree of association between these variables and interpret your findings. Set alpha = .05 for your statistical test. YOU CAN EITHER TYPE YOUR WORK OUT HERE OR TAKE A PICTURE OF HANDWRITTEN WORK AND EMAIL IT TO ME. %3D Anxiety Verbal Abuse 5. 4. 4.
A publisher reports that 69 % of their readers own a particular make of car. A marketing executive wants to test the claim that the percentage is actually under the reported percentage. A random sample of 200 found that 60% of the readers owned a particular make of car. Is there sufficient evidence at the 0.10 level to support the executive's claim? Step 5 of 7: Identify the value of the level of significance.
A statistician changes her level of significance from .001 to .05. What impact will this change have on her risk of making a Type I and Type II error? Is the change in the level of significance a good decision? Why or why not?