Net Realizable Value Method, Decision to Sell at Split-off or Process Further Arvin, Inc., produces two products, ins and outs, in a single process. The joint costs of this process were $60,000, and 13,000 units of ins and 37,000 units of outs were produced. Separable processing costs beyond the split-off point were as follows: ins, $94,000; outs, $465,000. Ins sell for $8.00 per unit; outs sell for $15.00 per unit. Required: 1. Allocate the $60,000 joint costs using the estimated net realizable value method. Ins Outs Allocated Joint Cost 2. Suppose that ins could be sold at the split-off point for $7.00 per unit. Should Arvin sell ins at split-off or process them further? Ins split-off. be processed further as there will be $ less more profit if sold at

Net Realizable Value Method, Decision to Sell at Split-off or Process Further Arvin, Inc., produces two products, ins and outs, in a single process. The joint costs of this process were $60,000, and 13,000 units of ins and 37,000 units of outs were produced. Separable processing costs beyond the split-off point were as follows: ins, $94,000; outs, $465,000. Ins sell for $8.00 per unit; outs sell for $15.00 per unit. Required: 1. Allocate the $60,000 joint costs using the estimated net realizable value method. Ins Outs Allocated Joint Cost 2. Suppose that ins could be sold at the split-off point for $7.00 per unit. Should Arvin sell ins at split-off or process them further? Ins split-off. be processed further as there will be $ less more profit if sold at

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

10th Edition

ISBN:9781259964947

Author:Libby

Publisher:Libby

Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Stoney Brook Company produces two products (X and Y) from a joint process. Each product may be sold at the split-off point or processed further. Additional processing requires no special facilities, and production costs of further processing are entirely variable and traceable to the products involved. Joint manufacturing costs for the year were $81,000. Sales values and costs were as follows: Product Units Made Sales Price at Split-Off If Processed Further Sales Value Separable Cost X 12,000 $ 43,000 $ 81,000 $ 10,500 Y 4,000 86,000 96,000 7,500 If the joint production costs are allocated based on the relative-sales-value method, what woukd be the amount of joint cost assigned to product X ?
Split Company produces three products — X, Y, and Z — from a joint process. Each product may be sold at the split-off point or processed further. Additional processing requires no special facilities, and production costs of further processing are entirely variable and traceable to the products involved. Last year all three products were processed beyond split-off. Joint production costs for the year were $142,000. Sales values and costs needed to evaluate Split's production policy follow. Product Units Produced Sales Value at Split Off If Processed Further Sales Value Additional Costs x 16,000 $ 45,500 $ 107,500 $ 6,700 y 4,000 31,500 56,500 14,000 z 5,000 38,000 52,000 18,000 The amount of joint costs allocated to product X using the physical measure method is (calculate all ratios and percentages to 4 decimal places, for example 33.3333%, and round all dollar amounts to the nearest whole dollar):
Solve both questions with explanation and proper formatting
Ibsen Company makes two products from a common input. Joint processing costs up to the split-off point total $45,500 a year. The company allocates these costs to the joint products on the basis of their total sales values at the split-off point. Each product may be sold at the split-off point or processed further. Data concerning these products appear below: Product X Product Y Total Allocated joint processing costs $27,300 $ 18,200 $ 45,500 Sales value at split-off point $ 30,000 $20,000 $50,000 Costs of further processing $ 24,200 $ 18,500 $ 42,700 Sales value after further processing $ 47,800 $58,300 $ 106,100 Required: a. What is financial advantage (disadvantage) of processing Product X beyond the split-off point? (Negative amount should be indicated by a minus sign.) b. What is financial advantage (disadvantage) of processing Product Y beyond the split-off point? c. What is the minimum amount the company should accept for Product X if it is to be sold at the split-off point? d.…
Milo Manufacturing produces products Kappa and Lambda from a joint process. Total joint costs are $168,000. The sales value at split-off was $174,960 for 8,400 units of Kappa and $63,280 for 12,600 units of Lambda. Required: What joint costs are allocated to the two products using the net realizable value at split-off approach? Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your final answers to the nearest whole dollar amounts. What joint costs are allocated to the two products using the physical quantities method? Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. Kappa Lambda a. Net realizable value method ??? ??? b. Physical quantities method ??? ???
Split Company produces three products-X, Y, and Z-from a joint process. Each product may be sold at the split-off point or processed further. Additional processing requires no special facilities, and production costs of further processing are entirely variable and traceable to the products involved. Last year all three products were processed beyond split-off. Joint production costs for the year were $130,000. Sales values and costs needed to evaluate Split's production policy follow. Product X y Z A. $27,132. B. $32,143. C. $37,143. D. $43,788. E. $60,714. OA B C Units Produced 14,000 7,500 3,500 OD Sales Value at Split Off $42,500 22,500 26,000 If Processed Further Sales Value $ 92,500 47,500 40,000 The amount of joint costs allocated to product Y using the sales value at split-off method is (calculate all ratios and percentages to 4 decimal places, for example 33.3333%, and round all dollar amounts to the nearest whole dollar): Additional Costs $ 3,700 8,000 9,000
Dinesh
The following information relates to a joint production process for three products, with a total joint production cost of $165,000. There are no separable processing costs for any of the three products. Product 1 2 Sales Value at Split-Off $ 181,500 Product 1 2 3 99,000 49,500 $ 330,000 Assume that the total sales value at the split-off point for product 1 is $66,000 instead of $181,500 and the sales value of product 3 is $3,300 instead of $49,500. Assume also that the firm treats product 3 as a joint product and uses the net realizable value method for accounting for joint costs. There are no separable processing costs for product 3. What amount of joint costs would be allocated to the three products using the relative sales value method? (Round your intermediate percentage values to 2 decimal places (i.e. 24.35%) and final answers to nearest whole dollar amount.) Units at Split-Off 320 960 1,920 3,200 Allocated Joint Cost
ats Assume a company has three products-A, B, and C-that emerge from a joint process. The joint processing costs that are incurred up to the split-off point equal $1,200,000. The selling prices and outputs for each product at the split-off point are as follows: Product A B С Selling Price $33 per pound $29 per pound $24 per pound Product A B C Each product can be processed further beyond the split-off point. The additional processing costs for each product and their respective selling prices after further processing are as follows: Output 14,000 pounds 18,000 pounds 19,000 pounds Additional Processing Costs $65,000 $72,000 $88,000 Selling Price $37 per pound $34 per pound $30 per pound The company is trying to decide whether to retain or discontinue the entire joint manufacturing process. What is the financial advantage (disadvantage) of continuing to operate the entire joint manufacturing process?