Answered: Moving from a general principle which… | bartleby

Related questions

Question

Moving from a general principle which everyone agrees with to prove a specific conclusion
through the use of evidence and argument is which type of reasoning:
Inductive
Deductive
Causal
Analogical

Expert Solution

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Blurred answer

Similar questions

St. Aurelius Augustine, in his theodicy attempting to reconcile freedom and determinism, recognized that any claim about God being unwilling to prevent evil would contradict: the doctrine of divine omniscience the doctrine of divine benevolence the doctrine of divine omnipotence the doctrine of divine predestination the doctrine of divine foreknowledge
is the knowledge that covers general truths of the operation of general laws, especially when acquired and tested by the scientific method. O biology O No answer text provided. No answer text provided. science
Which of Aristotle’s four causes is a definition of the substance of which something is composed? the material cause the teleological cause the formal cause the efficient cause the final cause
A good hypothesis requires a testable ___________ that is ___________.
The null hypothesis is: That the measured value is zero That the proposed model is not correct and the measured factors have no effect on the pattern That the proposed model is correct and perfectly explains the pattern That the experiment is null and void
What is the difference between a hypothesis and a theory?
In Turpin v. Sortini, the California Supreme Court said it was difficult to understand how awarding damages to a child who would not have been born if not for the defendants’ negligence “would disavow in the context of that sentence. Can you construct the moral argument that as a public policy matter, such an award would depreciate the value of human life?
When randomizing people to the intervention v. control group in the context of a randomized controlled trial, you should: Choose to enroll the people who are most likely to comply with your study protocol into the intervention group to avoid the problem of people not following through with the prescribed treatment you wish to study and thus lowering your chances of detecting an effect. Allow people to give their informed consent to participate in your study after they find out whether they have been randomized to one of the groups (either intervention or control), so that people who have doubts about any potential risks can make an informed choice about their participation after knowing what group they will be in. Make sure that you are aware of which people are in the intervention group and which are in the control group so that you can tailor your research questions to their groups. All of the above None of the above
Parmenides of Elea, who argued that our perceptions of change are illusions, but logical truths are eternal, held which of the following metaphysical viewpoints? extreme particularism (a view shared with Heraclitus) Aristotelian realism (a view shared with Thales) Platonic idealism (a view shared with Socrates) extreme universalism (a view shared with Pythagoras) all of the above
The hypothetico-deductive method in science includes all of the following components except: designing a critical test for the hypothesis, as exemplified by Galileo’s test of falling objects unquestioning acceptance of Platonic Idealism, as practiced by certain medieval Benedictines continuous testing of the hypothesis by further inquiry, as emphasized by Socrates logical deduction (from a universal rule to particular predictions), as emphasized by Aristotle logical induction (from particulars to universals), as emphasized by Plato
This part of the scientific method looks for patterns and poses questions Conclusion Observations Experiment Hypothesis
What is the distinguish between a hypothesis and a scientific theory?

SEE MORE QUESTIONS