Motorola is known as a company that saved itself. They are one of the companies mentioned in the 1980 television documentary on productivity, If Japan Can, Why Can't We? This program illustrated the quality and productivity problems of numerous companies. In the 1970s, Motorola produced television sets with a defect rate of 150 defects per 100 sets. In 1974, Motorola sold their television plant to Mitsushita. Using the same American labor force and Japanese quality management techniques, television sets were produced with an average of only 4 defects per 100 sets. Motorola continued to produce two-way radios, pagers, cellular radiotelephones, and other elec- tronic communication systems. In the 1980s, customers complained that Motorola's paging systems were not meeting quality standards; Japanese-made pagers were. Top Motorola executives could ei- ther continue losing customers and market share to Japan, as they did in consumer electronics dur- ing the 1970s, or they could develop a new company culture and insist on TQM. Motorola restated company goals for quality improvement of processes, global market share, and employee involvement. They invested heavily in training, with each employee (top-down) required to take a minimum of forty hours of training each year. They promoted a quality culture by provid- ing workers with a greater degree of job security. Employees are no longer fearful of making sugges- tions or even suggesting ways to eliminate their own jobs. 1. Giving people authority to make decisions and take actions does not mean they will make good decisions. How or what can be done to help? Why is removing fear helpful? 2. Managers basically want their company to do well. Why do many managers drift away from
Motorola is known as a company that saved itself. They are one of the companies mentioned in the 1980 television documentary on productivity, If Japan Can, Why Can't We? This program illustrated the quality and productivity problems of numerous companies. In the 1970s, Motorola produced television sets with a defect rate of 150 defects per 100 sets. In 1974, Motorola sold their television plant to Mitsushita. Using the same American labor force and Japanese quality management techniques, television sets were produced with an average of only 4 defects per 100 sets. Motorola continued to produce two-way radios, pagers, cellular radiotelephones, and other elec- tronic communication systems. In the 1980s, customers complained that Motorola's paging systems were not meeting quality standards; Japanese-made pagers were. Top Motorola executives could ei- ther continue losing customers and market share to Japan, as they did in consumer electronics dur- ing the 1970s, or they could develop a new company culture and insist on TQM. Motorola restated company goals for quality improvement of processes, global market share, and employee involvement. They invested heavily in training, with each employee (top-down) required to take a minimum of forty hours of training each year. They promoted a quality culture by provid- ing workers with a greater degree of job security. Employees are no longer fearful of making sugges- tions or even suggesting ways to eliminate their own jobs. 1. Giving people authority to make decisions and take actions does not mean they will make good decisions. How or what can be done to help? Why is removing fear helpful? 2. Managers basically want their company to do well. Why do many managers drift away from
Practical Management Science
6th Edition
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Chapter2: Introduction To Spreadsheet Modeling
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 20P: Julie James is opening a lemonade stand. She believes the fixed cost per week of running the stand...
Related questions
Question
Answer the questions using the total
![Motorola is known as a company that saved itself. They are one of the companies mentioned in the
1980 television documentary on productivity, If Japan Can, Why Can't We? This program illustrated
the quality and productivity problems of numerous companies.
In the 1970s, Motorola produced television sets with a defect rate of 150 defects per 100 sets. In
1974, Motorola sold their television plant to Mitsushita. Using the same American labor force and
Japanese quality management techniques, television sets were produced with an average of only 4
defects per 100 sets.
Motorola continued to produce two-way radios, pagers, cellular radiotelephones, and other elec-
tronic communication systems. In the 1980s, customers complained that Motorola's paging systems
were not meeting quality standards; Japanese-made pagers were. Top Motorola executives could ei-
ther continue losing customers and market share to Japan, as they did in consumer electronics dur-
ing the 1970s, or they could develop a new company culture and insist on TQM.
Motorola restated company goals for quality improvement of processes, global market share, and
employee involvement. They invested heavily in training, with each employee (top-down) required
to take a minimum of forty hours of training each year. They promoted a quality culture by provid-
ing workers with a greater degree of job security. Employees are no longer fearful of making sugges-
tions or even suggesting ways to eliminate their own jobs.
1. Giving people authority to make decisions and take actions does not mean they will make
good decisions. How or what can be done to help? Why is removing fear helpful?
2. Managers basically want their company to do well. Why do many managers drift away from
TQM or fail to implement basic elements of TQM?
3. What motivated Motorola to change? Why could they do it when other companies have
failed?
4. In the 1970s, do you think Motorola lost touch with employees? Customers? Process? Give
an example of each.](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2Fedd71b82-90ed-469d-aa20-c5779253354b%2F7bed6959-286f-452e-9bc4-4842f0839c7b%2Fmkzuztt_processed.jpeg&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:Motorola is known as a company that saved itself. They are one of the companies mentioned in the
1980 television documentary on productivity, If Japan Can, Why Can't We? This program illustrated
the quality and productivity problems of numerous companies.
In the 1970s, Motorola produced television sets with a defect rate of 150 defects per 100 sets. In
1974, Motorola sold their television plant to Mitsushita. Using the same American labor force and
Japanese quality management techniques, television sets were produced with an average of only 4
defects per 100 sets.
Motorola continued to produce two-way radios, pagers, cellular radiotelephones, and other elec-
tronic communication systems. In the 1980s, customers complained that Motorola's paging systems
were not meeting quality standards; Japanese-made pagers were. Top Motorola executives could ei-
ther continue losing customers and market share to Japan, as they did in consumer electronics dur-
ing the 1970s, or they could develop a new company culture and insist on TQM.
Motorola restated company goals for quality improvement of processes, global market share, and
employee involvement. They invested heavily in training, with each employee (top-down) required
to take a minimum of forty hours of training each year. They promoted a quality culture by provid-
ing workers with a greater degree of job security. Employees are no longer fearful of making sugges-
tions or even suggesting ways to eliminate their own jobs.
1. Giving people authority to make decisions and take actions does not mean they will make
good decisions. How or what can be done to help? Why is removing fear helpful?
2. Managers basically want their company to do well. Why do many managers drift away from
TQM or fail to implement basic elements of TQM?
3. What motivated Motorola to change? Why could they do it when other companies have
failed?
4. In the 1970s, do you think Motorola lost touch with employees? Customers? Process? Give
an example of each.
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, operations-management and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Recommended textbooks for you
![Practical Management Science](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337406659/9781337406659_smallCoverImage.gif)
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781337406659
Author:
WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:
Cengage,
![Operations Management](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259667473/9781259667473_smallCoverImage.gif)
Operations Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259667473
Author:
William J Stevenson
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
![Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259666100/9781259666100_smallCoverImage.gif)
Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259666100
Author:
F. Robert Jacobs, Richard B Chase
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
![Practical Management Science](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337406659/9781337406659_smallCoverImage.gif)
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781337406659
Author:
WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:
Cengage,
![Operations Management](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259667473/9781259667473_smallCoverImage.gif)
Operations Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259667473
Author:
William J Stevenson
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
![Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259666100/9781259666100_smallCoverImage.gif)
Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259666100
Author:
F. Robert Jacobs, Richard B Chase
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
![Business in Action](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780135198100/9780135198100_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Purchasing and Supply Chain Management](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781285869681/9781285869681_smallCoverImage.gif)
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781285869681
Author:
Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781478623069/9781478623069_smallCoverImage.gif)
Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781478623069
Author:
Steven Nahmias, Tava Lennon Olsen
Publisher:
Waveland Press, Inc.