Merger Manufacturing uses direct labor cost as the allocation base for applying MOH to WIP. The budgeted direct labor cost for the year $1,000,000. The budgeted manufacturing overhead was $800,000. The actual direct labor cost for the year was $1,100,000. The actual manufacturing overhead was $825,000. A. What was Merger's predetermined manufacturing overhead rate per direct labor dollars? B. How much MOH was applied to WIP during the year?

Merger Manufacturing uses direct labor cost as the allocation base for applying MOH to WIP. The budgeted direct labor cost for the year $1,000,000. The budgeted manufacturing overhead was $800,000. The actual direct labor cost for the year was $1,100,000. The actual manufacturing overhead was $825,000. A. What was Merger's predetermined manufacturing overhead rate per direct labor dollars? B. How much MOH was applied to WIP during the year?

Managerial Accounting

15th Edition

ISBN:9781337912020

Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler

Publisher:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. Tayler

Chapter6: Cost-volume-profit Analysis

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2E: Identify cost graphs The following cost graphs illustrate various types of cost behavior: For each...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

New
Mackenzie Consulting computes the cost of each consulting engagement by adding a portion of the firm wide overhead costs to the labor cost of the consultants on the engagement. The overhead costs are assigned to each consulting engagement using a cost driver rate based on consultant labor costs. Mackenzie Consulting’s overhead costs are $5 million per year, and total consultant labor cost is estimated at $2.5 million per year. Required (a) What is Mackenzie Consulting’s cost driver rate? (b) If the consultant labor cost on an engagement is $25,000, what cost will Mackenzie Consulting compute as the total cost of the consulting engagement?
Owe
What is the Total joint costs? Show all workings related to the answer.
Joint products A and B emerge from common processing that costs $80,000 and yields 5,000 units of Product A and 4,000 units of Product B. Product A can be sold for $100 per unit. Product B can be sold for $80 per unit. What amount of the joint costs will be assigned to Product A if joint costs are allocated on the basis of the number of units produced? A. $48,780 B. $35,556 C. $44,444 D. $31,220
Vicerelandu, Inc. manufactures X, Y, and Z from a joint process. Joint product costs were P60,000. Additional information are as follows:(see pic) 1. Assuming that joint costs are allocated using the physical measures (units produced) approach, what were the total costs allocated to product X ________________________ Y ______________________ Z ______________________2. Assuming that joint product costs are allocated using the relative sales value at split-off approach, what were the total costs allocated to product X_________________________ y ______________________ Z ______________________
Spin Cycle Architecture uses three activity pools to apply overhead to its projects. Each activity has a cost driver used to allocate the overhead costs to the projects. The activities and related overhead costs are as follows: initial concept formation $40,000, design $300,000, and construction oversight $100,000. The cost drivers and expected use are as follows.Expected Use of Cost Drivers Activities Cost Drivers per ActivityInitial concept formation Number of project changes 20 Design Squarefeet 150,000 Construction oversight Number of months 100(a) Compute the predetermined overhead rate for each activity. (b) Classify each of these activities as unit-level, batch-level, product-level, or facility-level.
Using the physical units method to allocate joint production cost would be?
Bixel Components manufactures products A1 and A2 from a joint process. Total joint costs are $360,000. The sales value at split-off was $400,000 for 4,500 units of product A1 and $200,000 for 1,400 units of product A2. Required: Assuming that total joint costs are allocated using the net realizable value at split-off approach, what amount of the joint costs was allocated to product A1? (Do not round intermediate calculations.) Joint cost of product A1
Tango Company produces joint products M, N, and T from a joint process. This information concerns a batch produced in April at a joint cost of $175,000: After Split-Off Product Units Produced and Sold Total Separable Costs Total Final Sales Value M $ 18, 200 N T 14,600 3,200 Product 15,500 9,500 10,500 Required: How much of the joint cost should be allocated to each joint product using the net realizable value method? (Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your final answers in whole dollars.) M N T $ 215,000 195,000 36,000 Allocated Joint Cost
Use this information about Department W to answer the question that follow. Department W had 2,760 units, one-third completed at the beginning of the period. 13,200 units were transferred to Department X from Department W during the period, and 950 units were one-half completed at the end of the period. Assume the completion ratios apply to direct materials and conversion costs. What is the total number of units to be assigned costs on the cost of production report for Department W?
Troester Manufacturing produces products X, Y, and Z from a joint process. Each product can be processed further and sold as X- Prime, Y-Prime, and Z-Prime. Information on the operations for the most recent period follows. Required: Determine the value of each missing item. The joint costs of $144,000 for X is the portion of the total joint cost of $288,000 that had been allocated to X. Note: Do not round intermediate calculations. Product Units produced Joint costs Sales value at split-off Additional costs to convert to Prime Sales value as Prime $ X 76,800 144,000 Y 38,400 33,600 $ 24,000 336,000 184,000 $ Z 19,200 72,000 14,400 96,000 Total 134,400 288,000 480,000 72,000 $ 616,000 $