Mays and McCovey are beer-brewing companies that operate in a duopoly (two-firm oligopoly). The daily marginal cost (MC) of producing a can of beer is constant and equals $0.60 per can. Assume that neither firm had any startup costs, so marginal cost equals average total cost (ATC) for each firm. Suppose that Mays and McCovey form a cartel, and the firms divide the output evenly. (Note: This is only for convenience; nothing in this model requires that the two companies must equally share the output.) Place the black point (plus symbol) on the following graph to indicate the profit-maximizing price and combined quantity of output if Mays and McCovey choose to work together. PRICE (Dollars per can) ཐྰ་རྒྱ་ ཐྰ་ཐྰ་ཐྰ་ཐྰ་ཕྱ་ཀླི་སྐྱ་ Demand MC=ATC Monopoly Outcome Oligopolists often behave noncooperatively and act in their own self-interest even though this decreases total profit in the market. Again, assume the two companies form a cartel and decide to work together. Both firms initially agree to produce half the quantity that maximizes total industry profit. Now, suppose that Mays decides to break the collusion and increase its output by 50%, while McCovey continues to produce the amount set under the collusive agreement. decreases increases to $ per c Therefore, you can conclude that total industry profit ofit is now when Mays's deviation from the collusive agreement causes the price of a can of beer to , while McCovey's profit is now $ $ Mays increases its output beyond the collusive quantity. 0.10 MR ° 5 10 15 20 25 35 40 50 QUANTITY (Thousands of cans of beer) cans and charge S per can. Given this so the daily total industry profit in the beer market is When they act as a profit-maximizing cartel, each company will produce information, each firm earns a daily profit of $ Oligopolists often behave noncooperatively and act in their own self-interest even though this decreases total profit in the market. Again, assume the two companies form a cartel and decide to work together. Both firms initially agree to produce half the quantity that maximizes total industry profit. Now, suppose that Mays decides to break the collusion and increase its output by decrease McCovey continues to produce the amount set under the collusive agreement. increase to $ per can. Mays's profit is now Therefore, you can conclude that total industry profit when Mays's deviation from the collusive agreement causes the price of a can of beer to S ,while McCovey's profit is now $ Mays increases its output beyond the collusive quantity.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question
help please answer in text form with proper workings and explanation for each and every part and steps with concept and introduction no AI no copy paste remember answer must be in proper format with all working
Mays and McCovey are beer-brewing companies that operate in a duopoly (two-firm oligopoly). The daily marginal cost (MC) of producing a can of
beer is constant and equals $0.60 per can. Assume that neither firm had any startup costs, so marginal cost equals average total cost (ATC) for each
firm.
Suppose that Mays and McCovey form a cartel, and the firms divide the output evenly. (Note: This is only for convenience; nothing in this model
requires that the two companies must equally share the output.)
Place the black point (plus symbol) on the following graph to indicate the profit-maximizing price and combined quantity of output if Mays and
McCovey choose to work together.
PRICE (Dollars per can)
ཐྰ་རྒྱ་ ཐྰ་ཐྰ་ཐྰ་ཐྰ་ཕྱ་ཀླི་སྐྱ་
Demand
MC=ATC
Monopoly Outcome
Oligopolists often behave noncooperatively and act in their own self-interest even though this decreases total profit in the market. Again, assume the
two companies form a cartel and decide to work together. Both firms initially agree to produce half the quantity that maximizes total industry profit.
Now, suppose that Mays decides to break the collusion and increase its output by 50%, while McCovey continues to produce the amount set under the
collusive agreement.
decreases
increases
to $
per c
Therefore, you can conclude that total industry profit
ofit is now
when
Mays's deviation from the collusive agreement causes the price of a can of beer to
, while McCovey's profit is now $
$
Mays increases its output beyond the collusive quantity.
0.10
MR
°
5
10 15 20 25
35
40
50
QUANTITY (Thousands of cans of beer)
cans and charge S
per can. Given this
so the daily total industry profit in the beer market is
When they act as a profit-maximizing cartel, each company will produce
information, each firm earns a daily profit of $
Oligopolists often behave noncooperatively and act in their own self-interest even though this decreases total profit in the market. Again, assume the
two companies form a cartel and decide to work together. Both firms initially agree to produce half the quantity that maximizes total industry profit.
Now, suppose that Mays decides to break the collusion and increase its output by decrease McCovey continues to produce the amount set under the
collusive agreement.
increase
to $
per can. Mays's profit is now
Therefore, you can conclude that total industry profit
when
Mays's deviation from the collusive agreement causes the price of a can of beer to
S
,while McCovey's profit is now $
Mays increases its output beyond the collusive quantity.
Transcribed Image Text:Mays and McCovey are beer-brewing companies that operate in a duopoly (two-firm oligopoly). The daily marginal cost (MC) of producing a can of beer is constant and equals $0.60 per can. Assume that neither firm had any startup costs, so marginal cost equals average total cost (ATC) for each firm. Suppose that Mays and McCovey form a cartel, and the firms divide the output evenly. (Note: This is only for convenience; nothing in this model requires that the two companies must equally share the output.) Place the black point (plus symbol) on the following graph to indicate the profit-maximizing price and combined quantity of output if Mays and McCovey choose to work together. PRICE (Dollars per can) ཐྰ་རྒྱ་ ཐྰ་ཐྰ་ཐྰ་ཐྰ་ཕྱ་ཀླི་སྐྱ་ Demand MC=ATC Monopoly Outcome Oligopolists often behave noncooperatively and act in their own self-interest even though this decreases total profit in the market. Again, assume the two companies form a cartel and decide to work together. Both firms initially agree to produce half the quantity that maximizes total industry profit. Now, suppose that Mays decides to break the collusion and increase its output by 50%, while McCovey continues to produce the amount set under the collusive agreement. decreases increases to $ per c Therefore, you can conclude that total industry profit ofit is now when Mays's deviation from the collusive agreement causes the price of a can of beer to , while McCovey's profit is now $ $ Mays increases its output beyond the collusive quantity. 0.10 MR ° 5 10 15 20 25 35 40 50 QUANTITY (Thousands of cans of beer) cans and charge S per can. Given this so the daily total industry profit in the beer market is When they act as a profit-maximizing cartel, each company will produce information, each firm earns a daily profit of $ Oligopolists often behave noncooperatively and act in their own self-interest even though this decreases total profit in the market. Again, assume the two companies form a cartel and decide to work together. Both firms initially agree to produce half the quantity that maximizes total industry profit. Now, suppose that Mays decides to break the collusion and increase its output by decrease McCovey continues to produce the amount set under the collusive agreement. increase to $ per can. Mays's profit is now Therefore, you can conclude that total industry profit when Mays's deviation from the collusive agreement causes the price of a can of beer to S ,while McCovey's profit is now $ Mays increases its output beyond the collusive quantity.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education