Mathews Company manufactures only one product. For the year ended December 31, the contribution margin decreased by $126,000 from the planned level of $540,000. The president of Mathews Company has expressed some concern about this decrease and has requested a follow-up report. The following data have been gathered from the accounting records for the year ended December 31: Actual Planned Difference—Increase (Decrease) Sales $2,277,000 $2,070,000 $207,000 Variable costs: Variable cost of goods sold $1,035,000 $990,000 $45,000 Variable selling and administrative expenses 828,000 540,000 288,000 Total variable costs $1,863,000 $1,530,000 $333,000 Contribution margin $414,000 $540,000 $(126,000) Number of units sold 34,500 30,000 Per unit: Sales price $66 $69 Variable cost of goods sold 30 33 Variable selling and administrative expenses 24 18 Required: 1. Prepare a contribution margin analysis report for the year ended December 31. Mathews Company Contribution Margin Analysis For the Year Ended December 31 Planned contribution margin $ Effect of changes in sales: Sales quantity factor $ Unit price factor Total effect of changes in sales Effect of changes in variable cost of goods sold: Variable cost quantity factor $ Unit cost factor Total effect of changes in variable cost of goods sold Effect of changes in selling and administrative expenses: Variable cost quantity factor $ Unit cost factor Total effect of changes in selling and administrative expenses Actual contribution margin $ 2. At a meeting of the board of directors on January 30, the president, after reviewing the contribution margin analysis report, made the following comment:It looks as if the price decrease of $3.00 had the effect of increasing sales. However, we lost control over the variable cost of goods sold and variable selling and administrative expenses. Let’s look into these expenses and get them under control! Also, let’s consider decreasing the sales price to $60 to increase sales further.Do you agree or disagree with the president's proposal and which reason would best explain your decision about the data? Agree with the president because both total variable cost of goods sold and total variable selling and administrative expenses have gone up along with the increase in sales indicating insignificant economies of scale that management can work on. Disagree with the president because the unit cost factor for the variable selling and administrative expenses cancels out the variable cost quantity factor for the variable selling and administrative expenses, which makes an investigation of expenses an unnecessary idea. Agree with the president because the total change in sales between actual and planned levels is greater than the total change in contribution margin, making more sales a way to decrease losses. Agree with the president because the per unit contribution margin for the actual level is less than the per unit contribution margin for the planned level, making more sales a way to decrease losses. Disagree with the president because the majority of the increase in the variable cost of goods sold was due to the variable cost quantity factor, so dropping the price may be even more negative for the company. The correct answer is:
Cost-Volume-Profit Analysis
Cost Volume Profit (CVP) analysis is a cost accounting method that analyses the effect of fluctuating cost and volume on the operating profit. Also known as break-even analysis, CVP determines the break-even point for varying volumes of sales and cost structures. This information helps the managers make economic decisions on a short-term basis. CVP analysis is based on many assumptions. Sales price, variable costs, and fixed costs per unit are assumed to be constant. The analysis also assumes that all units produced are sold and costs get impacted due to changes in activities. All costs incurred by the company like administrative, manufacturing, and selling costs are identified as either fixed or variable.
Marginal Costing
Marginal cost is defined as the change in the total cost which takes place when one additional unit of a product is manufactured. The marginal cost is influenced only by the variations which generally occur in the variable costs because the fixed costs remain the same irrespective of the output produced. The concept of marginal cost is used for product pricing when the customers want the lowest possible price for a certain number of orders. There is no accounting entry for marginal cost and it is only used by the management for taking effective decisions.
Mathews Company manufactures only one product. For the year ended December 31, the contribution margin decreased by $126,000 from the planned level of $540,000. The president of Mathews Company has expressed some concern about this decrease and has requested a follow-up report.
The following data have been gathered from the accounting records for the year ended December 31:
Actual |
Planned |
Difference—Increase (Decrease) | ||||
Sales | $2,277,000 | $2,070,000 | $207,000 | |||
Variable costs: | ||||||
Variable cost of goods sold | $1,035,000 | $990,000 | $45,000 | |||
Variable selling and administrative expenses | 828,000 | 540,000 | 288,000 | |||
Total variable costs | $1,863,000 | $1,530,000 | $333,000 | |||
Contribution margin | $414,000 | $540,000 | $(126,000) | |||
Number of units sold | 34,500 | 30,000 | ||||
Per unit: | ||||||
Sales price | $66 | $69 | ||||
Variable cost of goods sold | 30 | 33 | ||||
Variable selling and administrative expenses | 24 | 18 |
Required:
1. Prepare a contribution margin analysis report for the year ended December 31.
Mathews Company | ||
Contribution Margin Analysis | ||
For the Year Ended December 31 | ||
Planned contribution margin | $ | |
Effect of changes in sales: | ||
Sales quantity factor | $ | |
Unit price factor | ||
Total effect of changes in sales | ||
Effect of changes in variable cost of goods sold: | ||
Variable cost quantity factor | $ | |
Unit cost factor | ||
Total effect of changes in variable cost of goods sold | ||
Effect of changes in selling and administrative expenses: | ||
Variable cost quantity factor | $ | |
Unit cost factor | ||
Total effect of changes in selling and administrative expenses | ||
Actual contribution margin | $ |
2. At a meeting of the board of directors on January 30, the president, after reviewing the contribution margin analysis report, made the following comment:
It looks as if the price decrease of $3.00 had the effect of increasing sales. However, we lost control over the variable cost of goods sold and variable selling and administrative expenses. Let’s look into these expenses and get them under control! Also, let’s consider decreasing the sales price to $60 to increase sales further.
Do you agree or disagree with the president's proposal and which reason would best explain your decision about the data?
- Agree with the president because both total variable cost of goods sold and total variable selling and administrative expenses have gone up along with the increase in sales indicating insignificant economies of scale that management can work on.
- Disagree with the president because the unit cost factor for the variable selling and administrative expenses cancels out the variable cost quantity factor for the variable selling and administrative expenses, which makes an investigation of expenses an unnecessary idea.
- Agree with the president because the total change in sales between actual and planned levels is greater than the total change in contribution margin, making more sales a way to decrease losses.
- Agree with the president because the per unit contribution margin for the actual level is less than the per unit contribution margin for the planned level, making more sales a way to decrease losses.
- Disagree with the president because the majority of the increase in the variable cost of goods sold was due to the variable cost quantity factor, so dropping the price may be even more negative for the company.
The correct answer is:
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 2 images