LUSAKA (Reuters) - Zambia should keep mineral royalties capped at 7.5% in the 2020 budget to safeguard the health of the mining sector and promote additional investment, the Chamber of Mines said on Tuesday. The mining body said in proposals submitted to the finance ministry that the 2019 mining tax regime had raised the tax burden on mines to unsustainable and uncompetitive levels. Africa's No.2 copper producer increased its sliding scale for royalties of 4 to 6% by 1.5 percentage points and introduced a new 10% tax when the price of copper exceeds $7,500 per tonne. The scale is adjusted so that royalties are paid at higher levels as commodity prices climb and are reduced as prices fall. "If the 1.5% increment on each band of the sliding scale is to be maintained, the maximum rate should be capped at 7.5%, for an LME copper price equalling or exceeding US$7,500/tonne," the Chamber of Mines said. The mineral royalty tax should also be tax-deductible for mining firms as making it non-deductible as Zambia does amounts to taxation on revenue not received, it said. "Zambia is the only mining jurisdiction not allowing a deduction for these costs," it said. The Chamber said a proposed switch to a non-refundable sales tax from a refundable value-added tax should be delayed for at least two years until it is refined. It also urged a waiver on import duty on copper and cobalt concentrates, saying Zambia has excess smelting capacity which should not be forfeited to competing neighbouring states. Zambia should also keep mining energy tariff increases in step with inflation over the next three years until a cost of service study is completed and a new tariff plan agreed with indstry, it said. A ministry of finance spokesman was not immedaitely available for comment. Foreign Mining companies operating in Zambia include First Quantum Minerals, Barrick Gold and Glencore. Review this week's reading and the article above and respond to the issues raised. Zambian mining companies believe that mineral royalties should be capped at 7.5%. They also believe that the mineral royalty tax should be tax-deductible, as it otherwise amounts to double taxation on mineral revenues not received. In your response, please discuss each of these two issues and respond with that you would do. Would you change the mineral royalty cap and if so to what amount? Why or why not would you make or not make the change? What about the double taxation issue, would you change that? Why or why not?
LUSAKA (Reuters) - Zambia should keep mineral royalties capped at 7.5% in the 2020 budget to safeguard the health of the mining sector and promote additional investment, the Chamber of Mines said on Tuesday. The mining body said in proposals submitted to the finance ministry that the 2019 mining tax regime had raised the tax burden on mines to unsustainable and uncompetitive levels. Africa's No.2 copper producer increased its sliding scale for royalties of 4 to 6% by 1.5 percentage points and introduced a new 10% tax when the price of copper exceeds $7,500 per tonne. The scale is adjusted so that royalties are paid at higher levels as commodity prices climb and are reduced as prices fall. "If the 1.5% increment on each band of the sliding scale is to be maintained, the maximum rate should be capped at 7.5%, for an LME copper price equalling or exceeding US$7,500/tonne," the Chamber of Mines said. The mineral royalty tax should also be tax-deductible for mining firms as making it non-deductible as Zambia does amounts to taxation on revenue not received, it said. "Zambia is the only mining jurisdiction not allowing a deduction for these costs," it said. The Chamber said a proposed switch to a non-refundable sales tax from a refundable value-added tax should be delayed for at least two years until it is refined. It also urged a waiver on import duty on copper and cobalt concentrates, saying Zambia has excess smelting capacity which should not be forfeited to competing neighbouring states. Zambia should also keep mining energy tariff increases in step with inflation over the next three years until a cost of service study is completed and a new tariff plan agreed with indstry, it said. A ministry of finance spokesman was not immedaitely available for comment. Foreign Mining companies operating in Zambia include First Quantum Minerals, Barrick Gold and Glencore. Review this week's reading and the article above and respond to the issues raised. Zambian mining companies believe that mineral royalties should be capped at 7.5%. They also believe that the mineral royalty tax should be tax-deductible, as it otherwise amounts to double taxation on mineral revenues not received. In your response, please discuss each of these two issues and respond with that you would do. Would you change the mineral royalty cap and if so to what amount? Why or why not would you make or not make the change? What about the double taxation issue, would you change that? Why or why not?
Chapter12: Managing Economic Exposure And Translation Exposure
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 2BIC
Related questions
Question
LUSAKA (Reuters) - Zambia should keep mineral royalties capped at 7.5% in the 2020 budget to safeguard the health of the mining sector and promote additional investment, the Chamber of Mines said on Tuesday.
The mining body said in proposals submitted to the finance ministry that the 2019 mining tax regime had raised the tax burden on mines to unsustainable and uncompetitive levels.
Africa's No.2 copper producer increased its sliding scale for royalties of 4 to 6% by 1.5 percentage points and introduced a new 10% tax when the price of copper exceeds $7,500 per tonne.
The scale is adjusted so that royalties are paid at higher levels as commodity prices climb and are reduced as prices fall.
"If the 1.5% increment on each band of the sliding scale is to be maintained, the maximum rate should be capped at 7.5%, for an LME copper price equalling or exceeding US$7,500/tonne," the Chamber of Mines said.
The mineral royalty tax should also be tax-deductible for mining firms as making it non-deductible as Zambia does amounts to taxation on revenue not received, it said.
"Zambia is the only mining jurisdiction not allowing a deduction for these costs," it said.
The Chamber said a proposed switch to a non-refundable sales tax from a refundable value-added tax should be delayed for at least two years until it is refined.
It also urged a waiver on import duty on copper and cobalt concentrates, saying Zambia has excess smelting capacity which should not be forfeited to competing neighbouring states.
Zambia should also keep mining energy tariff increases in step with inflation over the next three years until a cost of service study is completed and a new tariff plan agreed with indstry, it said.
A ministry of finance spokesman was not immedaitely available for comment.
Foreign Mining companies operating in Zambia include First Quantum Minerals, Barrick Gold and Glencore.
Review this week's reading and the article above and respond to the issues raised. Zambian mining companies believe that mineral royalties should be capped at 7.5%. They also believe that the mineral royalty tax should be tax-deductible, as it otherwise amounts to double taxation on mineral revenues not received.
In your response, please discuss each of these two issues and respond with that you would do. Would you change the mineral royalty cap and if so to what amount? Why or why not would you make or not make the change? What about the double taxation issue, would you change that? Why or why not?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
Recommended textbooks for you