Let's pretend you're programming an embedded system, and that you want P2.1 to operate at a 70% duty cycle and a 30% off cycle, respectively, using timer 0 and timer 1. Data is being read from P1 and sent to a serial device concurrently. Give your reasons for or against using a real-time OS in this scenario.

Let's pretend you're programming an embedded system, and that you want P2.1 to operate at a 70% duty cycle and a 30% off cycle, respectively, using timer 0 and timer 1. Data is being read from P1 and sent to a serial device concurrently. Give your reasons for or against using a real-time OS in this scenario.

Database System Concepts

7th Edition

ISBN:9780078022159

Author:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Publisher:Abraham Silberschatz Professor, Henry F. Korth, S. Sudarshan

Chapter1: Introduction

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1PE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

There are a number of benefits to preemptively assigning processing to an I/O queue and then passing control to the CPU when it's ready. If the I/O is suddenly stopped, who knows what may happen? Will this have an impact on the CPU's burst? How exactly is this the case?
There have been many different suggestions made for how a processor might decode encrypted data and system instructions, as well as how it could carry out instructions based on the decoded data and system instructions that it has already run. The rebuttals that have been sent in will be encrypted before the processor reads them. Is there a particular benefit to using this kind of central processing unit? Where can I get the specifications for the system that will allow me to reach such high levels of performance and efficiency?
One I/O mechanism absent from this hypothetical computer is the Interrupt. How might this affect the efficiency of the system?
What are the benefits of using an Interrupt Service Routine to build the real-time capable elements of a system? Justify two of the following points.
Draw a Block Diagram, showing the connectivity of an I/O Module with an External Device by using data, control, and address lines.
Imagine you have to show how the Memory Module, I/O Module, and CPU Module link to the rest of the computer. Do you think you need to emphasise this point properly?
When feasible, what advantages does it provide to move process execution to the I/O queue first? If the I/O connection suddenly drops, what do you expect to happen? How would this affect the fastest possible CPU burst rate? I'm not sure I get what you're trying to say.
In this hypothetical embedded system architecture, P2.1 would have a 70% duty cycle generated by timer 0 and a 30% off cycle generated by timer 1. Data is being read from P1 and sent to a serial device concurrently. Justify your position on whether or not a real-time OS is needed for the system.
Match the Signal with what it means If a process is being run from terminal and that terminal suddenly goes away then the process receives this signal. The process was "interrupted". This happens when you press Control+C on the controlling terminal. A process can arrange to have this signal sent to it when there is some input ready for it to process or an output channel has become ready for writing. Illegal instruction. The program contained some machine code the CPU can't understand The operating system sends this signal to a background process when it tries to write output to its terminal. An attempt was made to access memory not allocated to the process. This is often caused by reading off the end of arrays etc. Choose... Choose... SIGHUP SIGSEGV SIGILL SIGIO SIGTTOU SIGINT
Answer the following: A section of the memory space with the address from 0x6000 to 0x9FFF needs to be fully partitioned to two peripherals with the same memory size. The first peripheral's address starts at Ox6000 and ends at Ox . The second peripheral's address starts at Ox ends at Ox9FFF. and In embedded programming, let i = 13, then j =i<< 2; we have j = 0x wise operation, let i = 0x00ff and then i &= ~0x0010, we have i = Ox . And for bit-
Let's pretend you're programming an embedded system, and that you want P2.1 to operate at a 70% duty cycle and a 30% off cycle, respectively, using timer 0 and timer 1. Data is being read from P1 and sent to a serial device concurrently. Give your reasons for or against using a real-time OS in this scenario.
Let's say you're building an embedded system that uses timers 0 and 1 to create a 70% duty cycle on P2.1 and a 30% off cycle, respectively. It will simultaneously read data from P1 and transfer it to a serial device. List if a real-time operating system is necessary for the system.