Let Wi and W2 be two subspaces of a finite dimensional vector space V over a field F. 1. Show that W1 n W, is a vector subspace of V, but that W¡ U W2 need not be a vector subspace in general. 2. Show that dim(W1) + dim(W2) – dim(W1 n W2) = dim(W1 + W2), where W1 + W2 just denotes the span of W1 U W2 in V. (Hint: Apply the rank nullity theorem to the natural map Wi O W2 → V .) 3. (Cultural comment, for extra credit.) The formula of part 2 is reminiscent of the simple combinatorial formula #S1 + #S2 – #(Si n S2) = #(S1 U S2). How might you deduce t from the formula of part 2? (f course this is a bit perverse since (3) is arguably easier than (2), but it illustrates the important way in which linear algebra resonates with combinatorics.)

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
icon
Related questions
Question
Let W1 and W2 be two subspaces of a finite dimensional vector space V over a field F.
1. Show that Wi n Wz is a vector subspace of V, but that Wi U W2 need not be a vector subspace in
general.
2. Show that
dim(W1) + dim(W2) – dim(W1 n W2) = dim(Wi + W2),
where W1 + W2 just denotes the span of W1 U W2 in V. (Hint: Apply the rank nullity theorem to the
natural map Wi O W2 → V .)
3. (Cultural comment, for extra credit.) The formula of part 2 is reminiscent of the simple combinatorial
formula
#S1 + #S2 – #(S1 n S2) = #(S1 U S2).
How might you deduce t from the formula of part 2? (f course this is a bit perverse since (3) is
arguably easier than (2), but it illustrates the important way in which linear algebra resonates with
combinatorics.)
Transcribed Image Text:Let W1 and W2 be two subspaces of a finite dimensional vector space V over a field F. 1. Show that Wi n Wz is a vector subspace of V, but that Wi U W2 need not be a vector subspace in general. 2. Show that dim(W1) + dim(W2) – dim(W1 n W2) = dim(Wi + W2), where W1 + W2 just denotes the span of W1 U W2 in V. (Hint: Apply the rank nullity theorem to the natural map Wi O W2 → V .) 3. (Cultural comment, for extra credit.) The formula of part 2 is reminiscent of the simple combinatorial formula #S1 + #S2 – #(S1 n S2) = #(S1 U S2). How might you deduce t from the formula of part 2? (f course this is a bit perverse since (3) is arguably easier than (2), but it illustrates the important way in which linear algebra resonates with combinatorics.)
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Basic Technical Mathematics
Basic Technical Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134437705
Author:
Washington
Publisher:
PEARSON
Topology
Topology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134689517
Author:
Munkres, James R.
Publisher:
Pearson,