Let f and g be continuous functions defined on a compact interval [a, b]. Assume that g(x) > 0 for all x E [a, b]. Prove that there exists xo E [a, b] such that qu | f(x)g(x)dx = f(wo) / g(x)dx. a (Hint: consider using change of variable and the integral mean value theorem or the second mean value theorem.) Is the same conclusion true if we remove the assumption g(x) > 0? If yes, please give a proof; if no, please give a counterexample.
Let f and g be continuous functions defined on a compact interval [a, b]. Assume that g(x) > 0 for all x E [a, b]. Prove that there exists xo E [a, b] such that qu | f(x)g(x)dx = f(wo) / g(x)dx. a (Hint: consider using change of variable and the integral mean value theorem or the second mean value theorem.) Is the same conclusion true if we remove the assumption g(x) > 0? If yes, please give a proof; if no, please give a counterexample.
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
Related questions
Question
![Let f and g be continuous functions defined on a compact interval [a, b].
Assume that g(x) > 0 for all x E [a, b]. Prove that there exists xo E [a, b] such that
9.
| f(x)g(x)dr = f (xo) | g(x)dx.
а
a
(Hint: consider using change of variable and the integral mean value theorem or the second
mean value theorem.)
Is the same conclusion true if we remove the assumption g(x) > 0? If yes, please
give a proof; if no, please give a counterexample.](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2F528d7aa4-a6a4-4ab9-a5a8-dcd52399db2a%2Fd171e605-88a5-4475-8af4-425fc2221422%2Fwyzc882_processed.png&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:Let f and g be continuous functions defined on a compact interval [a, b].
Assume that g(x) > 0 for all x E [a, b]. Prove that there exists xo E [a, b] such that
9.
| f(x)g(x)dr = f (xo) | g(x)dx.
а
a
(Hint: consider using change of variable and the integral mean value theorem or the second
mean value theorem.)
Is the same conclusion true if we remove the assumption g(x) > 0? If yes, please
give a proof; if no, please give a counterexample.
Expert Solution

This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps with 2 images

Recommended textbooks for you

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated

Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education

Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated

Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education

Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY

Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,

