- Let and x be relations on Z defined as follows: For a, be Z, a~b if and only if 2 divides a +b. • For a, b e Z, az b if and only if 3 divides a +b. (a) Is ~ an equivalence relation on Z2 If not, is this relation reflexive, symmetric, or transitive? (b) Is an equivalence relation on Z2 If not, is this relation reflexive, symmetric, or transitive?

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
icon
Related questions
Question
I need help with 10
(b) Use set builder notation (without using the symbol ~) to specify the set
C.
(c) Use the roster method to specify the set C.
10. Let and be relations on Z defined as follows:
• For a, be Z, a~b if and only if 2 divides a + b.
• For a, be Z, a b if and only if 3 divides a + b.
(a) Is an equivalence relation on Z? If not, is this relation reflexive,
symmetric, or transitive?
(b) Is an equivalence relation on Z? If not, is this relation reflexive,
symmetric, or transitive?
11. Let U be a finite, nonempty set and let P(U) be the power set of U. That
is, P(U) is the set of all subsets of U. Define the relation ~ on P(U) as
follows: For A, B E P(U), A ~ B if and only if ANB= 0. That is, the
ordered pair (A, B) is in the relation if and only if A and B are disjoint.
Is the relation ~ an equivalence relation on P(U)? If not, is it reflexive,
symmetric, or transitive? Justify all conclusions
Transcribed Image Text:(b) Use set builder notation (without using the symbol ~) to specify the set C. (c) Use the roster method to specify the set C. 10. Let and be relations on Z defined as follows: • For a, be Z, a~b if and only if 2 divides a + b. • For a, be Z, a b if and only if 3 divides a + b. (a) Is an equivalence relation on Z? If not, is this relation reflexive, symmetric, or transitive? (b) Is an equivalence relation on Z? If not, is this relation reflexive, symmetric, or transitive? 11. Let U be a finite, nonempty set and let P(U) be the power set of U. That is, P(U) is the set of all subsets of U. Define the relation ~ on P(U) as follows: For A, B E P(U), A ~ B if and only if ANB= 0. That is, the ordered pair (A, B) is in the relation if and only if A and B are disjoint. Is the relation ~ an equivalence relation on P(U)? If not, is it reflexive, symmetric, or transitive? Justify all conclusions
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 3 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Point Estimation, Limit Theorems, Approximations, and Bounds
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, advanced-math and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Recommended textbooks for you
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Basic Technical Mathematics
Basic Technical Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134437705
Author:
Washington
Publisher:
PEARSON
Topology
Topology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134689517
Author:
Munkres, James R.
Publisher:
Pearson,