Lerven's test of equality of variances shows: 1. The result is significant, so the variances are not different 2. The result is significant, so the variances are different 3. The result is non-significant, so the variances are not different 4. The result is non-significant, so the variances are different   From the Levene’s test result, what might you conclude about the use of the t test?   1. The assumption of equal variances is met, so the use of the t test may be appropriate 2. The assumption of equal variances is not met, so the use of the t test may be inappropriate 3. The assumption of equal variances is not met, so the use of the t test may be appropriate 4. The assumption of equal variances is met, so the use of the t test may be inappropriate

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question

Lerven's test of equality of variances shows:

1. The result is significant, so the variances are not different
2. The result is significant, so the variances are different
3. The result is non-significant, so the variances are not different
4. The result is non-significant, so the variances are different
 
From the Levene’s test result, what might you conclude about the use of the t test?
 
1. The assumption of equal variances is met, so the use of the t test may be appropriate
2. The assumption of equal variances is not met, so the use of the t test may be inappropriate
3. The assumption of equal variances is not met, so the use of the t test may be appropriate
4. The assumption of equal variances is met, so the use of the t test may be inappropriate
Group Statistics
Std. Error
Age in Years
N
Mean
Std. Deviation
Mean
Math Achievement
Lower than 13
556
50.7216
12.10574
.51340
Higher than 14
12.51362
.59454
443
50.9457
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for Equality of
Variances
t-test for Equality of Means
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference
Significance
Mean
Std. Error
Sig.
t
df
One-Sided p
Two-Sided p
Difference
Difference
Lower
Upper
Math Achievement
Equal variances
.671
.413
-.286
997
.387
.775
-.22410
.78259
-1.75981
1.31160
assumed
Equal variances not
assumed
-.285
933.546
.388
.775
-.22410
.78553
-1.76571
1.31750
Independent Samples Effect Sizes
95% Confidence Interval
Point
Estimate
Standardizer
Lower
Upper
Math Achievement
Cohen's d
12.28823
-.018
-.143
.107
Hedges' correction
12.29749
-.018
-.143
.107
Glass's delta
12.51362
-.018
-143
.107
a. The denominator used in estimating the effect sizes.
Cohen's d uses the pooled standard deviation.
Hedges' correction uses the pooled standard deviation, plus a correction factor.
Glass's delta uses the sample standard deviation of the control group.
Transcribed Image Text:Group Statistics Std. Error Age in Years N Mean Std. Deviation Mean Math Achievement Lower than 13 556 50.7216 12.10574 .51340 Higher than 14 12.51362 .59454 443 50.9457 Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Significance Mean Std. Error Sig. t df One-Sided p Two-Sided p Difference Difference Lower Upper Math Achievement Equal variances .671 .413 -.286 997 .387 .775 -.22410 .78259 -1.75981 1.31160 assumed Equal variances not assumed -.285 933.546 .388 .775 -.22410 .78553 -1.76571 1.31750 Independent Samples Effect Sizes 95% Confidence Interval Point Estimate Standardizer Lower Upper Math Achievement Cohen's d 12.28823 -.018 -.143 .107 Hedges' correction 12.29749 -.018 -.143 .107 Glass's delta 12.51362 -.018 -143 .107 a. The denominator used in estimating the effect sizes. Cohen's d uses the pooled standard deviation. Hedges' correction uses the pooled standard deviation, plus a correction factor. Glass's delta uses the sample standard deviation of the control group.
How would you report the results?
The derived t = 0.41 was significant at p = .05 with df = 997. Therefore, Ho was
rejected, and it was concluded that the mean math achievement score for the older
students (12.11) was significantly lower than the mean math achievement score for the
younger students (50.72), t(997) = 0.41, p < .001. In terms of the research question, it
appears that younger and older students are different in their level of math
achievement.
The derived t = 0.78 was significant at p = .05 with df = 997. Therefore, Ho was
rejected, and it was concluded that the mean math achievement score for the older
students (12.51) was significantly lower than the mean math achievement score for the
younger students (50.95), t(997) = 0.78, p < .01. In terms of the research question, it
appears that younger students are better at math than older students.
The derived t = -0.29 was significant at p = .05 with df = 997. Therefore, Ho was
rejected, and it was concluded that the mean math achievement score for the older
students (50.72) was significantly higher than the mean math achievement score for the
younger students (12.11), t(997) = -0.29, p < .000. In terms of the research question, it
appears that older students are better at math than younger students.
The derived t = 0.67 was not significant at p = .05 with df = 997. Therefore, Ho was not
rejected, and it was concluded that the mean math achievement score for the older
students (50.72) was not different than the mean math achievement score for the
younger students (50.95), t(997) = 0.67, p > .05. In terms of the research question, it
appears that younger and older students are not different in their level of math
achievement.
The derived t = -0.29 was not significant at p = .05 with df = 997. Therefore, Ho was
not rejected, and it was concluded that the mean math achievement score for the older
students (50.72) was not different than the mean math achievement score for the
younger students (50.95), t(997) = -0.29, p > .05. In terms of the research question, it
appears that younger and older students are not different in their level of math
achievement.
Transcribed Image Text:How would you report the results? The derived t = 0.41 was significant at p = .05 with df = 997. Therefore, Ho was rejected, and it was concluded that the mean math achievement score for the older students (12.11) was significantly lower than the mean math achievement score for the younger students (50.72), t(997) = 0.41, p < .001. In terms of the research question, it appears that younger and older students are different in their level of math achievement. The derived t = 0.78 was significant at p = .05 with df = 997. Therefore, Ho was rejected, and it was concluded that the mean math achievement score for the older students (12.51) was significantly lower than the mean math achievement score for the younger students (50.95), t(997) = 0.78, p < .01. In terms of the research question, it appears that younger students are better at math than older students. The derived t = -0.29 was significant at p = .05 with df = 997. Therefore, Ho was rejected, and it was concluded that the mean math achievement score for the older students (50.72) was significantly higher than the mean math achievement score for the younger students (12.11), t(997) = -0.29, p < .000. In terms of the research question, it appears that older students are better at math than younger students. The derived t = 0.67 was not significant at p = .05 with df = 997. Therefore, Ho was not rejected, and it was concluded that the mean math achievement score for the older students (50.72) was not different than the mean math achievement score for the younger students (50.95), t(997) = 0.67, p > .05. In terms of the research question, it appears that younger and older students are not different in their level of math achievement. The derived t = -0.29 was not significant at p = .05 with df = 997. Therefore, Ho was not rejected, and it was concluded that the mean math achievement score for the older students (50.72) was not different than the mean math achievement score for the younger students (50.95), t(997) = -0.29, p > .05. In terms of the research question, it appears that younger and older students are not different in their level of math achievement.
Expert Solution
Step 1

Introduction:

Denote σ12, σ22 as the true population variances of the two groups of interest.

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman