Laboratory compaction test results on a clayey soil are listed in the table below. Moisture content (%) Dry Unit Weight (kN/m³) 6 14.80 17.45 9. 18.52 11 18.90 12 18.50 14 16.90 The following are the results of a field unit weight determination test on the same soil with the sand cone method: Calibrated dry density of Ottawa sand = 1,540 kg/m3 Calibrated mass of Ottawa sand to fill the cone = 0.525 kg Mass of jar + cone + sand (before use) = 7.59 kg Mass of jar + cone + sand (after use) = 4.38 kg Mass of moist soil from hole = 2.85 kg Moisture content of moist soil = 12.2% Determine: a) Dry unit weight of compaction in the field. b) Plot the laboratory test result. c) Relative compaction in the field.
Laboratory compaction test results on a clayey soil are listed in the table below. Moisture content (%) Dry Unit Weight (kN/m³) 6 14.80 17.45 9. 18.52 11 18.90 12 18.50 14 16.90 The following are the results of a field unit weight determination test on the same soil with the sand cone method: Calibrated dry density of Ottawa sand = 1,540 kg/m3 Calibrated mass of Ottawa sand to fill the cone = 0.525 kg Mass of jar + cone + sand (before use) = 7.59 kg Mass of jar + cone + sand (after use) = 4.38 kg Mass of moist soil from hole = 2.85 kg Moisture content of moist soil = 12.2% Determine: a) Dry unit weight of compaction in the field. b) Plot the laboratory test result. c) Relative compaction in the field.
Chapter2: Loads On Structures
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
Related questions
Question
need help.
![egg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
Laboratory compaction test results on a clayey soil are listed in the table below.
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
Moisture content (%)
egg a Ch
Dry Unit Weight (kN/m³)
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
6
14.80
17.45
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
9.
18.52
11
18.90
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
12
18.50
a
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
14
16.90
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
The following are the results of a field unit weight determination test on the same soil with
the sand cone method:
Calibrated dry density of Ottawa sand = 1,540 kg/m³
Calibrated mass of Ottawa sand to fill the cone = 0.525 kg
Mass of jar + cone + sand (before use) = 7.59 kg
egg a Ch
Mass of jar + cone + sand (after use) = 4.38 kg
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Chegg a cnegg a Cnegg a Chegg a Cnegg a unegg a cnegg a unegg a unegg a Chegg a Chegg a Ch
egg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Ch
egg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Ch
egg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Ch
Mass of moist soil from hole = 2.85 kg
Moisture content of moist soil = 12.2%
Determine:
a) Dry unit weight of compaction in the field.
a
b) Plot the laboratory test result.
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
c) Relative compaction in the field.](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2F47ad1c44-ff44-4e8b-9d62-d558d51abc1b%2Fc555049f-e700-48a5-9da2-f31aba95daaf%2Fwvvt499_processed.png&w=3840&q=75)
Transcribed Image Text:egg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
Laboratory compaction test results on a clayey soil are listed in the table below.
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
Moisture content (%)
egg a Ch
Dry Unit Weight (kN/m³)
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
6
14.80
17.45
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
9.
18.52
11
18.90
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
12
18.50
a
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
14
16.90
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
The following are the results of a field unit weight determination test on the same soil with
the sand cone method:
Calibrated dry density of Ottawa sand = 1,540 kg/m³
Calibrated mass of Ottawa sand to fill the cone = 0.525 kg
Mass of jar + cone + sand (before use) = 7.59 kg
egg a Ch
Mass of jar + cone + sand (after use) = 4.38 kg
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Ch
egg a Chegg a cnegg a Cnegg a Chegg a Cnegg a unegg a cnegg a unegg a unegg a Chegg a Chegg a Ch
egg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Ch
egg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Ch
egg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Chegg a Ch
Mass of moist soil from hole = 2.85 kg
Moisture content of moist soil = 12.2%
Determine:
a) Dry unit weight of compaction in the field.
a
b) Plot the laboratory test result.
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
a Chegg a Ch
c) Relative compaction in the field.
Expert Solution
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps with 4 images
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)
Recommended textbooks for you
![Structural Analysis](https://compass-isbn-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337630931/9781337630931_smallCoverImage.jpg)
![Structural Analysis (10th Edition)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134610672/9780134610672_smallCoverImage.gif)
Structural Analysis (10th Edition)
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9780134610672
Author:
Russell C. Hibbeler
Publisher:
PEARSON
![Principles of Foundation Engineering (MindTap Cou…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337705028/9781337705028_smallCoverImage.gif)
Principles of Foundation Engineering (MindTap Cou…
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9781337705028
Author:
Braja M. Das, Nagaratnam Sivakugan
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Structural Analysis](https://compass-isbn-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337630931/9781337630931_smallCoverImage.jpg)
![Structural Analysis (10th Edition)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134610672/9780134610672_smallCoverImage.gif)
Structural Analysis (10th Edition)
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9780134610672
Author:
Russell C. Hibbeler
Publisher:
PEARSON
![Principles of Foundation Engineering (MindTap Cou…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337705028/9781337705028_smallCoverImage.gif)
Principles of Foundation Engineering (MindTap Cou…
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9781337705028
Author:
Braja M. Das, Nagaratnam Sivakugan
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
![Fundamentals of Structural Analysis](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780073398006/9780073398006_smallCoverImage.gif)
Fundamentals of Structural Analysis
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9780073398006
Author:
Kenneth M. Leet Emeritus, Chia-Ming Uang, Joel Lanning
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
![Sustainable Energy](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337551663/9781337551663_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Traffic and Highway Engineering](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305156241/9781305156241_smallCoverImage.jpg)
Traffic and Highway Engineering
Civil Engineering
ISBN:
9781305156241
Author:
Garber, Nicholas J.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning