What could be the correct answer? Labor productivity In the U.S. In the perlods 1973–1995 and 1995–2010 grew at average rates ofMultiple Cholce7.5 percent and 5.2 percent, respectively.1.5 percent and 2.8 percent, respectively.3.1 percent and 1.5 percent, respectively.4.1 percent and 4.3 percent, respectively.

The measure for the performance of the economy which compares the amount of goods and services being…

Labor productivity In the U.S. In the periods 1973–1995 and 1995–2010 grew at average rates of Multiple Choice 7.5 percent and 5.2 percent, respectively. 1.5 percent and 2.8 percent, respectively. 31 percent and 1.5 percent, respectively. 41 percent and 4.3 percent, respectively.

Labor productivity In the U.S. In the periods 1973–1995 and 1995–2010 grew at average rates of Multiple Choice 7.5 percent and 5.2 percent, respectively. 1.5 percent and 2.8 percent, respectively. 31 percent and 1.5 percent, respectively. 41 percent and 4.3 percent, respectively.

Principles of Economics 2e

2nd Edition

ISBN:9781947172364

Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Chapter21: Unemployment

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 25RQ: Would you expect the natural rate of unemployment to remain the same within one country over the...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

QUESTION 18 The table below represents national macroeconomic data for Year 1 and Year 2. Year Y K N 1 3200 1800 2 3200 1800 ? Suppose that the production function is given by y=AK0.3y0.7. Between Year 1 and Year 2, the total factor productivity of this economy changed by 7.9%. Given that information, how much did N change in percent terms approximately? (Submit your answer with up to two decimals, i.e., -10.22 for -10.22% and 11.44 for 11.442%.)
Suppose two households earn $50,000 and $84,000 respectively. What is the expected percent difference in wages between the children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren of the two households if the intergenerational correlation of earnings is 0.4? Show your work. Children: __________________ Grandchildren: __________________ Great-grandchildren: __________________
Consider a two-sector economy that employs a total of 105 units of a single input, labor. Ny of these units are allocated to sector 1, where the wage is 90 for the top five workers in that sector and zero for all others. (Both the wage for the top workers and the number who receive that wage are invariant to changes in Ng) The remaining N2= 105 - Ngunits of labor serve in sector 2, where every worker receives a wage of 10. All workers in sector 1 have an equal probability of being among the top five workers, 6/Ng. and all workers are risk neutral. Instructions: Round your answers to the nearest whole number. a. How many workers will work in sector 1? N1 = b. What will be the value of GNP for the economy? GNP = c. How would your answers differ if there were a 50% tax on the earnings of workers in sector 1? Workers in sector 1: GNP:
A6
Consider an economy with the Cobb-Douglas production function: Y = 3K0.2L0.8 K = 140000; L=8000 Round answers to two places after the decimal when necessary. c. Now suppose that Congress, concerned about the welfare of the working class, passes a law setting a minimum wage that is 9 percent above the current equilibrium wage. Assuming that Congress cannot dictate how many workers are hired at the mandated wage, calculate what happens to the real wage, employment, output, and the total amount earned by workers. Real wages = $ Total output = d. Does Congress succeed in its goal of helping the working class? O Yes, Congress does succeed in its goal of helping the working class. units No, Congress does not succeed in its goal of helping the working class. Employment = Total earned by workers = $ workers e. Does this analysis provide a good way of thinking about a minimum-wage law? O No, this analysis does not provide a good way of thinking about a minimum-wage law. Yes, this analysis does…
In 2020 in the United States, only about 10.8% of all workers belonged to a labor union. If union membership among workers increased to about 30% (roughly where it was in the 1950s in the US), what effect would we expect this to have? less bargaining power for workers O lower profit share of total income increased income inequality O increased racial and ethnic inequality
Suppose you observe over the last 15 years that the percentage growthin output was 25%, percentage growth in capital was 10%, and percentagechange in labor was 20%. Assume elasticity of output with respect to capitalis 0.4 and elasticity of output with respect to labor is 0.6. Calculate thecontributions to output growth from capital and labor, and then solve forproductivity growth. Please show equation throughout the whole process
During periods of expansion, the demand for labor will increase. This causes wages in the econom to decrease. True False
Q49 In order to maximize profits, a firm needs to determine the quantity of each factor that it will employ, which is dictated by price as well as productivity of the factor. Assume farmer in the Ottawa area named Justin Trudeau has fixed amounts of land and capital finds that total product is 24 for the first worker hired, 32 when two workers are hired, 37 when three are hired, and 40 when four are hired. The farmer's product sells for $3 per unit, and the wage rate is $13 per worker. The marginal revenue product of the second worker is Multiple Choice $9 $15 $24 $8 $14.
om/mod/quiz/attempt.php?attempt=1835779&cmid=8805848&page=1 ARNING SYSTEM (ACADEMIC) Od. 10%. Time left 0:44:20 1 O e. 50%. 10 CLEAR MY CHOICE 19 If the number of people unemployed is 100, the number of people employed is 1000, and the working-age population is 1400, then the employment-to-population ratio is Fin Select one: O a. 78.6 percent. O b. 75 percent. O c. 71.4 percent. O d. 66.6 percent. The unemployment rate is found by dividing the number of unemployed people by the Select one: O a. number of working individuals, and multiplying by 100. O b. number of the working-age population, and multiplying by 100.
Q.2 You are discussing the labour discipline model with your friend. All else equal, which of the following is/are true about the wage-setting curve? Statement 1: A monitoring device to detect shirking shifts the wage-setting curve down. Statement 2: A decrease in unemployment benefits shifts the wage-setting curve up. Statement 3: In a country where the stigma attached to unemployment is high, the wage-setting curve would be lower. A. None of the statements are true. B. Statements 2 and 3 are true. C. All the statements are true. D. Only Statement 2 is true. E. Statements 1 and 3 are true.
When Sue graduated from college, she got a job with a starting salary of $30.000. When Sue's sister Jan graduated five years later, her starting salary was $36.000. Jan likes to tease Sue about earning more than Sue did right out of college. Sue dlaims that she actually had the higher salary in real dollars. The Consumer Price Index rose 28 percent during the five years separating the sisters' graduations. Therefore, we can conclude that Jan earmed the highor real salary ts Sue eamed the higher real salary there isn't enough information to determine who earned the higher real salary both Sue and Jan earned the same real salary am Next