Kermit bought a production line 5 years ago for $35,000. At that time it was estimated to have a service life of 10 years and salvage at the end of its service life of $10,000. Kermit's CFO recently proposed to replace the old line with a modern line expected to last 15 years and cost $95,000. This new line will provide $7,000 savings in annual operating and maintenance costs, and have a salvage value of $15,000 at the end of 15 years. The seller of the new line is willing to accept the old line as a trade-in for its current fair market value, which is $12,000. The CFO estimates that if the old line is kept for 5 more years, its salvage value will be $6,000. We are looking at performing a replacement analysis. The defender must be analyzed using a first cost of and a salvage value of for years. The challenger must be analyzed using a first cost of and a salvage value of for years. Enter the answers as 12345. DO NOT enter $ symbol or comma separators. DO NOT enter decimal places.

Kermit bought a production line 5 years ago for $35,000. At that time it was estimated to have a service life of 10 years and salvage at the end of its service life of $10,000. Kermit's CFO recently proposed to replace the old line with a modern line expected to last 15 years and cost $95,000. This new line will provide $7,000 savings in annual operating and maintenance costs, and have a salvage value of $15,000 at the end of 15 years. The seller of the new line is willing to accept the old line as a trade-in for its current fair market value, which is $12,000. The CFO estimates that if the old line is kept for 5 more years, its salvage value will be $6,000. We are looking at performing a replacement analysis. The defender must be analyzed using a first cost of and a salvage value of for years. The challenger must be analyzed using a first cost of and a salvage value of for years. Enter the answers as 12345. DO NOT enter $ symbol or comma separators. DO NOT enter decimal places.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Rubber: Initial investment: $132,000 Annual cost: $43,000 Annual revenue: $100,000 Salvage value: $11,000 Useful life: 10 years Using the cotermination assumptions, a study period of 6 years, and a MARR of 9%, what is the present worth of the rubber alternative? Assume that the rubber alternative's equipment has a market value of $17,000 at the end of Year 6. Typed numeric answer will be automatically saved.
The beautiful expert Hand written solution is not allowed.
Part a.) An engineer with Calahan Technologies calculated the AW of cost values shown for a presently owned machine using estimates she obtained from the vendor and company records. A challenger has an economic service life of 7 years with an AW of $-86,000 per year. Assume that all future costs remain as estimated and the challenger's technology will definitely replace that of the defender within 5 years. When should the company purchase the challenger? Retention Period, Years AW of Costs, $ per Year -92,000 2 -81,000 -87,000 4 -89,000 5 -95,000 Part b.) The costs and revenue projections for a new product made on the machine from Part a.) are estimated below. What is the estimated profit at a production rate of 25% above breakeven? Fixed cost = $592,000 per year Production cost per unit = $198 Revenue per unit = $330
A 5 year-old tooling kit that was purchased new for $9000 has a current market value of $4000 and expected 0&M costs of $3000, increasing by $1200 per year. Future market values are expected to decline by 25% annually (going forward). The kit can be used for another 3 years at most. The optimal replacement kit costs $8000 and has 0&M costs starting at $2500 per year, increasing by $2000 per year. Salvage value for the new kit at the end of the first year is $4000 and falls by $1000 per year thereafter (until zero). The new model kit will be needed indefinitely. Assume a unique minimum AEC~(15%) for both kits (both the current and replacement kit). The MARR is 15%. 1) What is the AECC• ? a) Less than 6925.70 b) 6925.70-6945.70 c) 6945.70-6965.70 ) d) 6965.70-6985.70 e) More than 6985.70
SUBJECT: Engineering Economics Number 5
complete solution, thank you
A machine purchased 3 years ago for $140,000 is now too slow to satisfy the demand of the customers. It can be upgraded now for $88,000 or sold to a smaller company internationally for $50,000. The upgraded machine will have an annual operating cost of $88,000 per year and a $24,000 salvage value in 3 years. If upgraded, the presently owned machine will be retained for only 3 more years, then replaced with a machine to be used in the manufacture of several other product lines. The replacement machine, which will serve the company now and for a maximum of 8 years, costs $223,000. Its salvage value will be $56,000 for years 1 through 5: $20,000 after 6 years; and $10,000 thereafter. It will have an estimated operating cost of $45,000 per year. Perform an economic analysis at 11% per year using a specified 3-year planning horizon. a) Determine if the current machine should be replaced now or 3 years from now. b) Once decided, determine the equivalent AW for the next three years. a) The…
Because it fumes at room temperatures, hydrochloric acid creates a very corrosive work environment. A machine working in that environment is deteriorating quickly and can be used for only one more year, at which time it will be scrapped with no salvage value. It was purchased 3 years ago for $88,000, and its operating cost for the next year is expected to be $49,000. A more corrosion-resistant challenger will cost $206,000 with an operating cost of $46,000 per year. It is expected to have a $50,000 salvage value after its 10-year ESL. At an interest rate of 8% per year, what minimum replacement value would render the challenger attractive? The minimum replacement value that would render the challenger attractive is $ .
The young and great expert Hand written solution is not allowed
A machine purchased 3 years ago for $140,000 is now too slow to satisfy the demand of the customers. It can be upgraded now for $86,000 or sold to a smaller company internationally for $47,000. The upgraded machine will have an annual operating cost of $92,000 per year and a $37,000 salvage value in 3 years. If upgraded, the presently owned machine will be retained for only 3 more years, then replaced with a machine to be used in the manufacture of several other product lines. The replacement machine, which will serve the company now and for a maximum of 8 years, costs $222,000. Its salvage value will be $57,000 for years 1 through 5; $20,000 after 6 years; and $10,000 thereafter. It will have an estimated operating cost of $45,000 per year. Perform an economic analysis at 9% per year using a specified 3-year planning horizon. a) Determine if the current machine should be replaced now or 3 years from now. b) Once decided, determine the equivalent AW for the next three years. a) The…
Ab3
The following tables show the marginal costs of a defender over its remaining four years of service life. If the challenger's minimum EUAC is $29,403, what is the most appropriate replacement decision? Year 1234 Marginal cost $31,053 $26,353 $28,003 $32,803 ○ A. No decision can be made unless additional calculations are made on the challenger B. Replace the defender now OC. No decision can be made unless additional calculations are made on the defender ○ D. Keep the defender for at least one more year