Juanita is the owner of a 30-year-old home, and is looking to buy a homeowner’s insurance policy. The previous home she owned was severely damaged by a tree falling through the roof, a peril that was not covered by her basic-form policy, therefore she is looking to buy a comprehensive policy that covers damage from all perils (except those specifically excluded). Based on the peril coverage it offers, she purchases an insurance policy.

Juanita is the owner of a 30-year-old home, and is looking to buy a homeowner’s insurance policy. The previous home she owned was severely damaged by a tree falling through the roof, a peril that was not covered by her basic-form policy, therefore she is looking to buy a comprehensive policy that covers damage from all perils (except those specifically excluded). Based on the peril coverage it offers, she purchases an insurance policy.

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING

10th Edition

ISBN:9781259964947

Author:Libby

Publisher:Libby

Chapter1: Financial Statements And Business Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1Q

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Iko purchased a house through Stockholm Bank Pvt., Ltd. A year later, Iko wanted to make improvements on the mortgaged property and borrowed money from Jeremy, mortgaging the same property again. Jeremy is unaware of the mortgage of the house by Stockholm Bank and records the mortgage. Analyze the situation in case Iko is unable to repay both the mortgagees.
Langstraat, age seventeen, owned a motorcycle that he insured against liability with Midwest Mutual Insurance Company. He signed a notice of rejection attached to the policy indicating that he did not desire to purchase uninsured motorists’ coverage from the insurance company. Later he was involved in an accident with another motorcycle owned and operated by a party who was uninsured. Langstraat now seeks to recover from the insurance company, asserting that his rejection was not a valid rejection because he is a minor. Can Langstraat recover from Midwest? Explain.
Gussie Fring has 100/300/50 automobile insurance coverage, and was involved in a very serious accident. One person sustained $200,000 in medical claims, and two other people are awarded a total of $135,000 each for injuries in an auto accident in which Gussie was judged at fault. How much, if any, of this judgment would the insurance not cover?
Tim and Allison are married and have two children, ages 8 and 13. Allison is a "nonworking" spouse who devotes all of her time to household activities. Estimate how much life insurance Tim and Allison should carry to cover Allison. Life insurance need
Christina is a divorced independent marketing consultant age 32, in excellent health, with two young children. She took out a $100,000 whole life insurance policy seven years ago, before the children were born. At that time she was employed in an administrative capacity in a real estate office and had a limited income. She appreciated the value of permanent life insurance but was concerned about her ability to afford whole life premiums over the long-term. Consequently, she chose a dividend option that applied the annual policy dividend to reduce the premium due each year. Christina is now doing much better financially and can easily afford the annual premium. With two children dependent on her she is concerned, however, that the death benefit of her policy should increase with inflation over the long-term. What dividend option could Christina select to meet her current needs? A) The premium reduction dividend option B) The cash dividend option C) The accumulation dividend option D)…
Linda induced Sally to enter into a purchase of a home theater receiver by intentionally misrepresenting the power output to be seventy-five watts when in fact the unit delivered only forty watts. Sally paid $450 for the receiver. Receivers producing forty watts generally sell for $200, whereas receivers producing seventy-five watts generally sell for $550. Sally decides to keep the receiver and sue for damages. How much may Sally recover in damages from Linda?
Landlord leased her suburban ice cream parlor for three years at a rent of $2000 a month toBaskin. Six months later, Baskin transferred his interest in the lease to Herrell. One year later,Herrell transferred his interest in the lease to Ana. Now, none of the parties is paying the rent.Landlord wants to sue Herrell for the rent, "because he is the only one who can probably paythe rent that is due." In order to sue Herrell for the remaining rent, Landlady will have to prove:a-That the transfers from Baskin to Herrell, and from Herrell to Ana, both conveyed the fullremaining interest in the leasehold. b-That the transfer from Baskin to Herrell conveyed the full remaining interest in the lease leasehold, but the transfer from Herrell to Ana conveyed less than the full remaining interest in thec-That the transfer from Baskin to Herrell conveyed less than the full remaining interest in the leasehold, but the transfer from Herrell to Ana conveyed the full remaining interest in the lease. d-…
Can you help me with some tips Question? Imagine you are a deciding Judge for the following scenario. Decide who should win the case including the reasoning for the decision? 1. Chip bought an insurance policy on his house from Insurance Co. The policy covered damage from fire but explicitly excluded coverage for harm caused “by or through an earthquake.” When an earthquake struck, Chip’s house suffered no fire damage but the earthquake caused a building some blocks away to catch on fire. That fire ultimately spread to Chip’s house, burning it down. 2. Is Insurance Co. liable to Chip? 3. Argument for Insurance Co.: The policy could not have been clearer or more explicit. If there had been no earthquake, Chip’s house would still be standing. The policy does not cover his loss. Argument for Chip: His house was not damaged by an earthquake, it burned down. The policy covered fire damage. If a contract is ambiguous, it must be interpreted against the drafter of the contract.
Upon Jena’s retirement, the couple plans to relocate their home close to the beach. For this purpose, they intend to buy a house near the beach and a rental property (to fund their retirement). They do not have the funds to make these purchases. Please explain to the couple the downsizing retirement strategy most appropriate to their circumstance.
Antoine LaDuke suffered a major loss on his older home due to mud from a flood. Although he had homeowner's insurance, what was the probable reason he was not covered? A) His home was probably too expensive. B) His policy excluded flood-related damages. C) This is a personal liability issue. D) Older homes are excluded from flood-related damages. 29) Insurers in California are required to offer ________ coverage to consumers due to the substantial risk factors in that state.
Tt1.
Jorge and his wife own a beachfront vacation home in Savannah, Georgia. During the year, high winds from a tropical storm shatter a sliding glass door and rain from the storm causes extensive water damage to the kitchen. The Savannah area qualified for federal disaster relief. Fortunately, during a calm in the storm, Jorge is able to board up the door, which limits the water damage to the kitchen. The items damaged in the storm are: Cost ValueBefore ValueAfter InsuranceProceeds Kitchen furniture $2,085 $1,325 $430 $510 TV 265 200 0 115 Refrigerator 1,000 920 90 775 Linoleum flooring 1,645 880 0 470 In addition, Jorge pays $610 to replace the sliding glass door. The insurance company will not reimburse him for the cost of the new door because the old sliding glass door did not meet the company's standards for a hurricane area. The amount of Jorge's casualty loss before considering any annual limitations that may apply is…