“Jean,” a veteran nurse, pleaded guilty to a misdemeanornegligence charge in the case of a 75-year-old woman whodied after slipping into a coma during routine outpatient eyesurgery at an eye surgery center. Jean admitted that she failedto monitor the woman’s vital signs during the procedure.The surgeon who performed the procedure called the nurse’saction pure negligence, saying that the patient could havebeen saved. The patient was a vibrant grandmother of 10who had walked three quarters of a mile the morning of hersurgery and had sung in her church choir the day before. Aspart of her plea arrangement, the nurse agreed to serve 6 months of probation—the first 2 months on house arrest—and surrender her nursing license.3. Those bringing the charges against Jean are called:a. Appellatesb. Defendantsc. Plaintiffsd. Attorneys4. Jean’s attorney was careful to explain in her defense that Jeanhad specialty knowledge, experience, and clinical judgmentand had met certain criteria established by a nongovernmentalassociation, as a result of which she was granted recognition ina specified practice area. What is this sort of credential called?a. Accreditationb. Licensurec. Certificationd. Board approval5. If review of this patient’s record revealed that she had neverconsented to the eye surgery, of which intentional tort mightthe surgeon have been guilty?a. Assaultb. Batteryc. Invasion of privacyd. False imprisonment 6. What must be established to prove that malpractice or negli-gence has occurred in this case? a. The surgeon who performed the procedure called thenurse’s action pure negligence, saying that the patientcould have been saved.b. The fact that this patient should not have died—she was avibrant grandmother of 10 who had walked three quartersof a mile the morning of her surgery and had sung in herchurch choir the day before.c. The nurse intended to harm the patient and was willfullynegligent.d. The nurse had a duty to monitor the patient’s vital signs,failed to do so, the patient died, and it was Jean’s failure todo her duty that caused the patient’s death.7. When the attorney representing the patient’s family calls Jeanand asks to talk with her about the case so that he can betterunderstand her actions, how should Jean respond?a. “I’m sorry, but I can’t talk with you. You’ll have to contactmy attorney.”b. Answer the attorney’s questions honestly and make surethat he understands her side of the story.c. Appeal to the attorney’s sense of compassion and try to enlisthis sympathy by telling him how busy it was that morning.d. “Why are you doing this to me? This could ruin me!”
“Jean,” a veteran nurse, pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor
negligence charge in the case of a 75-year-old woman who
died after slipping into a coma during routine outpatient eye
surgery at an eye surgery center. Jean admitted that she failed
to monitor the woman’s vital signs during the procedure.
The surgeon who performed the procedure called the nurse’s
action pure negligence, saying that the patient could have
been saved. The patient was a vibrant grandmother of 10
who had walked three quarters of a mile the morning of her
surgery and had sung in her church choir the day before. As
part of her plea arrangement, the nurse agreed to serve
6 months of probation—the first 2 months on house arrest—
and surrender her nursing license.
3. Those bringing the charges against Jean are called:
a. Appellates
b. Defendants
c. Plaintiffs
d. Attorneys
4. Jean’s attorney was careful to explain in her defense that Jean
had specialty knowledge, experience, and clinical judgment
and had met certain criteria established by a nongovernmental
association, as a result of which she was granted recognition in
a specified practice area. What is this sort of credential called?
a. Accreditation
b. Licensure
c. Certification
d. Board approval
5. If review of this patient’s record revealed that she had never
consented to the eye surgery, of which intentional tort might
the surgeon have been guilty?
a. Assault
b. Battery
c. Invasion of privacy
d. False imprisonment
6. What must be established to prove that malpractice or negli-
gence has occurred in this case?
a. The surgeon who performed the procedure called the
nurse’s action pure negligence, saying that the patient
could have been saved.
b. The fact that this patient should not have died—she was a
vibrant grandmother of 10 who had walked three quarters
of a mile the morning of her surgery and had sung in her
church choir the day before.
c. The nurse intended to harm the patient and was willfully
negligent.
d. The nurse had a duty to monitor the patient’s vital signs,
failed to do so, the patient died, and it was Jean’s failure to
do her duty that caused the patient’s death.
7. When the attorney representing the patient’s family calls Jean
and asks to talk with her about the case so that he can better
understand her actions, how should Jean respond?
a. “I’m sorry, but I can’t talk with you. You’ll have to contact
my attorney.”
b. Answer the attorney’s questions honestly and make sure
that he understands her side of the story.
c. Appeal to the attorney’s sense of compassion and try to enlist
his sympathy by telling him how busy it was that morning.
d. “Why are you doing this to me? This could ruin me!”
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
