It turns out that for s in the interior of that interval (away from the endpoints), the function t → f(t)e-st will be integrable on the whole real line (you do not need to prove this). Therefore, the bilateral Laplace transform, (£f)(s) = f(t)e-* dt, is well defined for such s. Taking for granted that you can exchange derivatives in s and integrals in t (a version of Leibniz' rule for differentiation under the integral sign), give an expression for and then for, d" (Lf)(s) dsn 2 d" (Lf)(s) dsn mn := = (−1)n 1s=0 where n is an arbitrary natural number. Note that this question is about derivatives of the Laplace transform, not the Laplace transform of derivatives discussed in class in the unilateral case. "

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
icon
Related questions
Question
2. It turns out that for s in the interior of that interval (away from the endpoints), the function t →
f(t)est will be integrable on the whole real line (you do not need to prove this). Therefore, the
bilateral Laplace transform,
∞
(Lf)(s) = T [ f(t)e-st dl,
and then for,
∞
is well defined for such s. Taking for granted that you can exchange derivatives in s and integrals in t
(a version of Leibniz' rule for differentiation under the integral sign), give an expression for
d" (Lf)(s)
dsn
d" (Lf)(s)
dsn
mn :=(−1)n
s=0
where n is an arbitrary natural number. Note that this question is about derivatives of the Laplace
transform, not the Laplace transform of derivatives discussed in class in the unilateral case.
9
Transcribed Image Text:2. It turns out that for s in the interior of that interval (away from the endpoints), the function t → f(t)est will be integrable on the whole real line (you do not need to prove this). Therefore, the bilateral Laplace transform, ∞ (Lf)(s) = T [ f(t)e-st dl, and then for, ∞ is well defined for such s. Taking for granted that you can exchange derivatives in s and integrals in t (a version of Leibniz' rule for differentiation under the integral sign), give an expression for d" (Lf)(s) dsn d" (Lf)(s) dsn mn :=(−1)n s=0 where n is an arbitrary natural number. Note that this question is about derivatives of the Laplace transform, not the Laplace transform of derivatives discussed in class in the unilateral case. 9
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 6 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Basic Technical Mathematics
Basic Technical Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134437705
Author:
Washington
Publisher:
PEARSON
Topology
Topology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134689517
Author:
Munkres, James R.
Publisher:
Pearson,